Good night!
I understand that is a decision of the SC, but I will give my opinion.
Totally agree
Best regards.
Eliane Domingos de Sousa
gtalk/skype: elianedomingos
twitter: eliane_domingos
identica/facebook: elianedomingos
Em 12-08-2011 22:31, Varun Mittal escreveu:
+1
Best Regards
Varun
+1
Best Regards
Varun
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Thorsten Behrens <
t...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Florian Effenberger wrote:
> > In order to have legal advice for the process, which might take a
> > few weeks, I'd like to ask the steering committee to approve a sum
> > of 3.000,- €
On 12 Aug 2011, at 10:02, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Caolan McNamara wrote on 2011-08-11 12:26:
>> Alright, swap the logos, default to non TDF one.
>
> if we do so, are there any objections to my proposed trademark policy change?
> Here it is again for convenience:
>
> old version:
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> In order to have legal advice for the process, which might take a
> few weeks, I'd like to ask the steering committee to approve a sum
> of 3.000,- € in total.
>
+1 - this has my approval.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h
+1.
2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
> +1 :)
>
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 18:46:
>
>> Thank you Drew.
>>
>
> --
> Florian Effenberger
> Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
> Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
> Skype: floeff | Twitter/Ident
+1 :)
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 18:46:
Thank you Drew.
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to stee
2011/8/12 drew
> On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 18:08 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > drew wrote on 2011-08-12 17:52:
> > > Is it exhaustive?
> >
> > I just checked the mailing list system. There still is the conference
> > jury mailing list, where all paper submissions are being sent to
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 18:08 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> drew wrote on 2011-08-12 17:52:
> > Is it exhaustive?
>
> I just checked the mailing list system. There still is the conference
> jury mailing list, where all paper submissions are being sent to.
> Everyone had a chance to
I'm not sure if I'm able to vote on this matter. But if so, +1
2011/8/12 David Emmerich Jourdain
> +1
>
> David
>
> 2011/8/12 Charles-H. Schulz
>
> > A lawyer is indispensable I think, and the fees sound reasonnable . +1
> >
> > Charles.
> > Le 12 août 2011 17:34, "Florian Effenberger" <
> > fl
On 12 Aug 2011, at 14:48, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Florian Effenberger
> wrote:
>> based on the feedback, this would be my proposal to vote on:
>
> I suppose the minor corrections below fall in the category of the
> "beauty corrections" you mentio
+1
David
2011/8/12 Charles-H. Schulz
> A lawyer is indispensable I think, and the fees sound reasonnable . +1
>
> Charles.
> Le 12 août 2011 17:34, "Florian Effenberger" <
> flo...@documentfoundation.org>
> a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > as many of you know, we're right before filing the applicat
Hi,
drew wrote on 2011-08-12 17:52:
Is it exhaustive?
I just checked the mailing list system. There still is the conference
jury mailing list, where all paper submissions are being sent to.
Everyone had a chance to join the jury, we made a public call. Jury
discussions are not meant to be a
Hi :)
+1
definitely.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Charles-H. Schulz
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Fri, 12 August, 2011 16:55:51
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] contracting a lawyer for the foundation's
set-up
process
A lawyer is indispensabl
Hi :)
I thought that was the purpose of the fund-raising that was a huge success.
Proper accountants would have wrapped-up all these extra costs into the amount
originally asked for. I kept quiet at the time because we were uncertain about
whether that much could be raised. Hindsight is great
A lawyer is indispensable I think, and the fees sound reasonnable . +1
Charles.
Le 12 août 2011 17:34, "Florian Effenberger"
a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> as many of you know, we're right before filing the application for
> legally setting up the Foundation.
>
> For the process of filing, it is highly a
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 17:48 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yep, your list is correct.
Is it exhaustive?
Tanks,
Drew
> Some details:
>
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 16:20:
>
> > SC private
>
> Contains of steering committee plus deputies, plus a few people who have
>
Hi,
yep, your list is correct. Some details:
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 16:20:
SC private
Contains of steering committee plus deputies, plus a few people who have
been involved in the discussion of setting up a foundation, even before
TDF was born. Recipient list should be re-de
Hello,
as many of you know, we're right before filing the application for
legally setting up the Foundation.
For the process of filing, it is highly advisable to have a lawyer
assisting us and acting as official point of contact. Not only will some
legal topics come up, but also being repres
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> +1
>
> Possibly omit the middle paragraph.
I agree with that. The second paragraph serve no practical purpose.
Norbert
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffi
Hi :)
+1
Also, allowing threads (such as the one about job-description for marketing
contacts) to split out to other, more relevant, lists is great and seems to be
working fine.
It's inevitable that discussions take place all over the place because there is
a lot of energy and excitement i
2011/8/12 David Nelson
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Florian Effenberger
> wrote:
> > I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a
> private
> > list where all the steering committee members are on, and that there are
> > private phone calls sometimes
Hello David,
Afaict I list the following ones:
SC private
AB private
Web infrastructure
Security
Marketing private (for pr drafting and readiness)
As I am personally not subscribed to all of them I might have missed one or
taken one as private while it is public.
Best,
Charles.
Le 12 août 2011 1
2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a
> private list where all the steering committee members are on, and that there
> are private phone calls sometimes.
>
> We never planned to have things in secret, so sorry if that i
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a private
> list where all the steering committee members are on, and that there are
> private phone calls sometimes.
>
> We never planned to have things in
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> based on the feedback, this would be my proposal to vote on:
I suppose the minor corrections below fall in the category of the
"beauty corrections" you mentioned, but the SC's decision might be
clearer for some people if
Hi,
Paulo de Souza Lima wrote on 2011-08-12 14:09:
I do agree to what Charles said, but I have some things to say on that:
There should have a public note, somewhere, explaining that private lists do
exist and showing the requirements for a member to be accepted in those
lists. What I think is
2011/8/12 Charles-H. Schulz
> Hello,
>
> 2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
>
> To second Florian's point about the private list, and to answer Drew's
> requests, it is actually rather simple. There is no decision by principle
> taken privately on the private mailing list. In fact the steering-discus
It seems very fine to me!!! Great work!!!
2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
> Hi,
>
> Caolan McNamara wrote on 2011-08-11 12:26:
>
>> Alright, swap the logos, default to non TDF one.
>>
>
> if we do so, are there any objections to my proposed trademark policy
> change? Here it is again for convenien
+1
2011/8/12 Tom Davies
> Hi :)
> +1
>
> Possibly omit the middle paragraph. It would leave the statement without
> an
> explanation but at least it would state what the preference is.
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Florian Effenberger
> To: steering
Hi :)
+1
Possibly omit the middle paragraph. It would leave the statement without an
explanation but at least it would state what the preference is.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Florian Effenberger
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Fri, 12 Augus
Hi,
Caolan McNamara wrote on 2011-08-11 12:26:
Alright, swap the logos, default to non TDF one.
if we do so, are there any objections to my proposed trademark policy
change? Here it is again for convenience:
old version:
==
Proper Form: TDF marks should be used in their exact form, neither
Hi,
based on the feedback, this would be my proposal to vote on:
==
Screenshots for documentation, website and marketing should preferably
be taken on GNU/Linux, but may also be taken on any other operating system.
The Steering Committee acknowledges that there is a small legal risk
involved
Hello,
2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
> Hello,
>
> let me jump in quickly with a few thoughts:
>
> - The set-up of this list was discussed in one of last year's steering
> commitee public conference calls, and if I remember correctly, it was even a
> demand by the community, not by the steering c
33 matches
Mail list logo
