Hello Simon,
Le 30/10/2011 10:27, Simon Phipps a écrit :
On 29 Oct 2011, at 17:47, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
following today's SC/BoD phone conference, I'd hereby like to propose, based
on André's suggestion, that the to be elected membership committee will
consist of
Hello,
just to have it official: I'd hereby like to nominate Thorsten Behrens
as election officer for the upcoming membership committee elections.
As Thorsten is elected BoD member, he is not running for an MC seat, and
thus should have no conflict of interest in acting as election officer.
Hi,
2011/10/30 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Hello,
André Schnabel wrote on 2011-10-26 21:48:
as we have discussed previously, the paragraphs about the membership
committee in the current statutes draft differ in some points from what we
have in the bylaws. I hope, I
Hi,
David Emmerich Jourdain wrote on 2011-10-30 16:28:
IMHO, I don't see why can we not adopt this option. The current MC proved
that was (and is) impartial and deeply focused on meritocracy, essential
factors for an MC.
For me, the current MC proved that's fully deserving of this gentlemen's
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 30 Oct 2011, at 15:34, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-10-30 16:34:
+1 from my side... do we only need one?
IMHO one is enough, as we had it for the BoD elections.
Note that, for
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
just to have it official: I'd hereby like to nominate Thorsten Behrens as
election officer for the upcoming membership committee elections.
As Thorsten is elected BoD member, he is not running
Hi,
Am 30.10.2011 17:09, schrieb Norbert Thiebaud:
Maybe we can do with the current MC as 'initially designated' for the
first 6 month of the foundation and organize a MC election then, since
it would be a good idea to have BoD election and MC election somewhat
separated to avoid
Based on the statutes, the BoD is in charge of defining the size of the MC,
with the limitations of having at least three people, and not more than 10%
of the total members (i.e. 13-15 people right now, IIRC).
I'd ask all BoD members to vote on the above proposal. My vote: +1
+1
--
Jesús
Hi,
2011/10/30 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Am 30.10.2011 17:09, schrieb Norbert Thiebaud:
Maybe we can do with the current MC as 'initially designated' for the
first 6 month of the foundation and organize a MC election then, since
it would be a good idea to have BoD election
Hello,
Norbert Thiebaud wrote on 2011-10-30 17:20:
I agree: the BoD election should be supervised by the MC and
vice-versa. The 'Election Officer' is just the point man, the
'executive officer'. He can be any member designated by the body
having oversight of the election.
indeed. The BoD
Hello,
sorry for spamming you so massively today, but I want to use the free
day to get some formal things done for TDF.
The current statutes (which you will soon have in a translated English
version) foresee, as it is a legal requirement in Germany, that there
will be two chairmen: One
Hi :)
Florian. It is good to have these issues dealt with. There is no need to
apologise for 'spam' as it is all relevant and important stuff. If these issue
weren't raised today they would have to be raised another day and they are the
type of thing that is good to deal with and get out of
Hi Florian, *,
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011, 19:44:02 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Hello,
sorry for spamming you so massively today, but I want to use the free
day to get some formal things done for TDF.
I assist you in spamming a bit ;-)
(...)
The statues do not set explicit rules on
13 matches
Mail list logo
