Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

2022-11-23 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Sophie, sophi wrote: > just for clarity for all, what would prevent it to be released as an > extension on the extension site? is it too complex? > No, not at all, just needs someone updating it there (an older release is available already: https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/

Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

2022-11-23 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Susanne, all, Susanne LO wrote: > I will try to install wollmux, it does not work today. > If it works, ipost some examples. > WollMux 18.2.10 (https://github.com/WollMux/WollMux/releases/tag/RELEASE_18.2.10), the latest release, is only tested to work with LibreOffice 6.4. For 7.3/7.4, plea

Re: [board-discuss] Report about numbers from Apple App Store

2022-11-23 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi Alex, Am 22.11.22 um 22:41 schrieb Alexander Thurgood: Hi Andreas, Perhaps I'm missing something, but why would the board have these figures, unless the private company distributing the product agreed to provide them, or was under some contractual obligation to do so? sorry but it's a bit d

Re: [board-discuss] Report about numbers from Apple App Store

2022-11-23 Thread Andreas Mantke
Good evening Thorsten, hi all, Am 22.11.22 um 21:22 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: Good evening Andreas, hi all, Andreas Mantke wrote: I asked the board more than three weeks ago, to provide to TDF members the numbers from the Apple app store for the last years. The current numbers were just publ

Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

2022-11-23 Thread sophi
Hi Thorsten, Your answer bring me some more questions :) Le 23/11/2022 à 17:15, Thorsten Behrens a écrit : Hi Sophie, sophi wrote: Will that stay as an extension or will it be integrated to LibreOffice core? There's currently no plans to do so, no. I don't think that is technically desirable

Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

2022-11-23 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Sophie, sophi wrote: > Will that stay as an extension or will it be integrated to > LibreOffice core? > There's currently no plans to do so, no. I don't think that is technically desirable, since the implementation is Java-only. > Is everything (code comments, strings, doc) still in German? >

Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

2022-11-23 Thread Susanne LO
Hi all!, hi Sophie, There will be translation to english- see technical project info. I will try to install wollmux, it does not work today. If it works, ipost some examples. Susanne — Susanne Mohn > Am 23.11.2022 um 16:13 schrieb sophi : > > Hi Thorsten, > >> Le 23/11/202

Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

2022-11-23 Thread sophi
Hi Thorsten, Le 23/11/2022 à 12:12, Thorsten Behrens a écrit : Dear community, as announced during LibOCon, and subsequently discussed in the ESC, here's the formal adoption proposal for the "WollMux" template / form letter / mail merge engine / Java extension, from the City of Munich. For ref

AW: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

2022-11-23 Thread susanne.mohn-lo
Dear all This is a very good idea! In order to make the Wollmux Extension available for large organizations, a central distribution (Windows: via ActiveDirectorie or SCCM) must be possible. As well as checking whether JAVA Runtime is installed and the Installation/provision of a customized config.

[board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document Foundation

2022-11-23 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dear community, as announced during LibOCon, and subsequently discussed in the ESC, here's the formal adoption proposal for the "WollMux" template / form letter / mail merge engine / Java extension, from the City of Munich. For reference, I attach the full proposal (so the initial version gets ar