Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-13 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
2011/8/12 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org Hello David, Afaict I list the following ones: SC private Just a question I'd like to ask: I SC private and Core@ the same list or not? Cheers. -- Paulo de Souza Lima Técnico em Eletrônica e Administrador

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-13 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
Tks =) 2011/8/13 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Hi, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote on 2011-08-13 16:54: Just a question I'd like to ask: I SC private and Core@ the same list or not? yes. Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org** Steering

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello, 2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Hello, let me jump in quickly with a few thoughts: - The set-up of this list was discussed in one of last year's steering commitee public conference calls, and if I remember correctly, it was even a demand by the

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote on 2011-08-12 14:09: I do agree to what Charles said, but I have some things to say on that: There should have a public note, somewhere, explaining that private lists do exist and showing the requirements for a member to be accepted in those lists. What I think is

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread David Nelson
Hi Florian, On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote: I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a private list where all the steering committee members are on, and that there are private phone calls sometimes. We never

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Hi, snip I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a private list where all the steering committee members are on, and that there are private phone calls sometimes. We never planned to have things in

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
2011/8/12 David Nelson li...@traduction.biz Hi Florian, On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote: I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a private list where all the steering committee members are on, and that

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread Tom Davies
intentions. Regards from Tom :) From: Paulo de Souza Lima paulo.s.l...@varekai.org To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org Sent: Fri, 12 August, 2011 15:27:28 Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose 2011/8/12 David Nelson li

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, yep, your list is correct. Some details: Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 16:20: SC private Contains of steering committee plus deputies, plus a few people who have been involved in the discussion of setting up a foundation, even before TDF was born. Recipient list should be

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread drew
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 17:48 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hi, yep, your list is correct. Is it exhaustive? Tanks, Drew Some details: Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 16:20: SC private Contains of steering committee plus deputies, plus a few people who have been

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, drew wrote on 2011-08-12 17:52: Is it exhaustive? I just checked the mailing list system. There still is the conference jury mailing list, where all paper submissions are being sent to. Everyone had a chance to join the jury, we made a public call. Jury discussions are not meant to be

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-12 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
2011/8/12 drew d...@baseanswers.com On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 18:08 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hi, drew wrote on 2011-08-12 17:52: Is it exhaustive? I just checked the mailing list system. There still is the conference jury mailing list, where all paper submissions are being

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-11 Thread drew
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:10 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Hi, This is a short reminder about the purpose of this list. It has been setup to serve as the SC / BoD primary communication channel. Therefore it accomodates SC members requests from project members. While we do appreciate

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-11 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hi Drew, While there's a list for confidential matters we intend and want to have a dexision making process that's transparent. This list was designed with the notion that it'd be both a formal tool (voting, opinions of the BoD members, etc.) and a communication tool for important an urgent

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-11 Thread David Nelson
Hi, I find this list to be a very useful point of contact with the SC. If people avoid using it for other purposes than discussions in which there is a genuine utility in involving the SC then SC members will be encouraged to read it regularly and properly, and the list will indeed serve its true

Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion purpose

2011-08-11 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, let me jump in quickly with a few thoughts: - The set-up of this list was discussed in one of last year's steering commitee public conference calls, and if I remember correctly, it was even a demand by the community, not by the steering committee. (Which does not mean we do not