Re: [board-discuss] Re: New draft of the proposal for in-house developers
On Sat, 2022-03-26 at 21:13 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 12:21 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > > > - fixing old regressions, e.g. the chart bug in the report builder; > > This one I'm unaware of. Is this bug#87012 or another? tdf#117162 apparently. Seems to work again now with: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=70f3a94949cce612be9eff14fca94976acfc61a4 https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=78f7bd90b96ac168fdacd1e0cb0693ab3861872a which maybe helps to unblock things a little in the short term -- Caolán McNamara, Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Re: [board-discuss] New draft of the proposal for in-house developers
Hi Franklin, On 25/03/2022 14:26, Franklin Weng wrote: we have seen something like "why do you think we (C*a) would want to help you in creating a competing product?" when someone asked for help in our developer's IRC channel. I'm flattered by what I assume is this new C*a contraction of Collabora =) Collabora helps its competitors every day - primarily by contributing tons of code to LibreOffice that they can use. Also by working collaboratively with other engineers from competing companies. We give feedback, advice and help on the code - as we do for volunteers - typically in some rough proportion to their estimated contribution. We're somewhat less sympathetic to silly questions (RTM) or to attempts by others to leech our time away to support their needs & customers without contributing meaningfully (as/when/if that happens). As I regularly say: working on the LibreOffice code is fun - and I'd really recommend actively contributing to the code to everyone so they can get a real feel for how that works first-hand. Regards, Michael. -- michael.me...@collabora.com <><, GM Collabora Productivity Hangout: mejme...@gmail.com, Skype: mmeeks (M) +44 7795 666 147 - timezone usually UK / Europe -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Re: [board-discuss] Translation as part of the attic policy
Hi Kendy, Thorsten, all, Thanks a lot for your feedback and explanations, that clears my concerns. As Paolo said, mentioning translation/documentation was confusing me. Cheers Sophie Le 29/03/2022 à 10:18, Jan Holesovsky a écrit : Hi Sophie, sophi píše v Po 28. 03. 2022 v 21:55 +0200: Would that mean that each time a l10n team resign for whatever reason (UK currently in my mind and heart), it will be atticized and need at least 3 contributors who use something else than Weblate to demonstrate their contributions to be accepted again in the LO community? From my point of view, you don't have to worry at all: 1) 'The “attic” is a special area [...] not being actively developed, *can* be stored.' (emphasis mine) => it is up to the l10n community to propose to ESC and Board to atticize something, not that it would go there automatically. If it fits you better not to atticize (eg. there is no risk when incomplete translations are used for production, etc.), I don't think anything forces you to put the particular language to the attic. 2) 'A sufficient number of developers [2] have committed changes', where the [2] says: '1 for small, 3 for medium, and 6 developers for a large project' => if the l10n community decide to atticize something, best if they define the size they'd like to target for the de-atticization. To me, 'small' sounds reasonable for one language. Hope this helps? All the best, Kendy -- Sophie Gautier so...@libreoffice.org GSM: +33683901545 IRC: soph Foundation coordinator The Document Foundation -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
