Hi,
Am 31.05.22 um 15:59 schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Michael,
Michael Weghorn píše v So 28. 05. 2022 v 21:21 +:
(...)
The following passage in that section is a bit unclear to me:
It is also expected that while the Targeted Developer is unable to
actively contribute to public and
Would you be able to give us some more background to this please? While
it's good to have the decision public, without the context of the request
it is hard to understand the merits of this large unbudgeted expenditure.
If that remains sensitive, perhaps post to the list only Trustees can read.
Hi Kendy,
I kindly ask you once more to rename your file and your proposal as it
has nothing much to do with mine.
That is not a merged proposal is simply another proposal and what you
are doing is only generating confusion.
Thanks
Paolo
On 31/05/2022 14:57, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi
Hi Michael,
Michael Weghorn píše v So 28. 05. 2022 v 21:21 +:
> I think having Paolo's original proposal and this one in a form
> that's
> easy to compare is very helpful.
Thank you!
> After reading the discussion on the mailing list, I was surprised
> that
> the overall direction still
Hi all,
Paolo Vecchi píše v Po 30. 05. 2022 v 13:44 +0200:
> After having read the other proposal I have integrated some minor
> changes into v 2.1 that you can find here:
>
> https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/sFtCk9wiMWbt2pB
>
> Some of the changes implemented:
> - added that TDF
Hello,
the following decision, which was taken in private on 2022-05-31, is now
made public in accordance with our statutes.
Florian Effenberger wrote on 27.05.22 at 10:15:
I hereby ask for a VOTE on an additional budget of 30.000 € for legal
consultations.
The vote runs 72h from now.
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi píše v Po 30. 05. 2022 v 13:44 +0200:
> While TDF is committed
> to working with members of the commercial ecosystem in a mutually
> beneficial relationship it should be made clear that third parties
> and
> suppliers (commercial contributors) should not limit what a
>
