Re: [board-discuss] fast ahead soon... Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1

2022-12-01 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Marina, Thanks! Marina Latini wrote on 01/12/2022 10:12: I'm still struggling to understand why there was the need to trash 9 months of work for presenting a new text that sounds more like just the "abstract" of the previous document with some changes that are even bringing more controver

Re: [board-discuss] the importance of shepherding this list & TDF

2022-12-01 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi all, FYI: The mail below contains parts of confidential communication. Of course selective, causing an unfair unbalanced picture of reality. I make a strong call for an end to this show. Please let's move this to a board meeting. Failing, to protect TDF, we'll consider moderating this list

Re: [board-discuss] fast ahead soon... Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1

2022-12-01 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke wrote on 30/11/2022 19:56: Am 30.11.22 um 14:20 schrieb Cor Nouws: is that she read things at another location. Thus I've mentioned the minutes where I do not point at people, but reflect on the content. (Note the difference with what she describes). I quote your

[board-discuss] Invitation and agenda for a formal board meeting on Monday, December 19, 17:00 UTC (18:00 CET / Berlin time)

2022-12-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dear board, as discussed previously, I hereby invite all members and deputies of the board of directors to a formal board meeting via Jitsi on Monday, December 19, 1700 UTC (1800 Berlin time) (the time of our usual board meetings) at https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/TDFBoard The

Re: [board-discuss] fast ahead soon...

2022-12-01 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi all, On 01/12/2022 14:05, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Hi Marina, all, Marina Latini wrote: I'm still struggling to understand why there was the need to trash 9 months of work for presenting a new text that sounds more like just the "abstract" of the previous document [...] Sorry for not havin

Re: [board-discuss] fast ahead soon...

2022-12-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Marina, all, Marina Latini wrote: > I'm still struggling to understand why there was the need to trash 9 months > of work for presenting a new text that sounds more like just the "abstract" > of the previous document [...] > Sorry for not having explained this in a proper way. The work is not

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Off-topic character assassinations - do we really need moderation again?

2022-12-01 Thread Paolo Vecchi
On 01/12/2022 09:51, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote: Come on!!! Anyone can set up an email on their mobile, at this point, that's a completely ridiculous excuse. ... and I still never had a logical explanation on why it was so urgent to do it on a Friday when the complaints about LOOL archival

Re: [board-discuss] fast ahead soon... Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1

2022-12-01 Thread Marina Latini
Hello Cor, hi all, during the last board call on Monday, I unsuccessfully tried to get clarifications about this new "proposal" for hiring in-house developers. I'm still struggling to understand why there was the need to trash 9 months of work for presenting a new text that sounds more like j

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Off-topic character assassinations - do we really need moderation again?

2022-12-01 Thread Daniel A. Rodriguez
Come on!!! Anyone can set up an email on their mobile, at this point, that's a completely ridiculous excuse. El 30 de noviembre de 2022 8:52:34 p. m. GMT-03:00, Thorsten Behrens escribió: >Hi Daniel, > >Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote: >> And that does not look like a board decision to me. >> >The