Hi Kendy, all,
Am 11.04.22 um 12:24 schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke píše v Pá 08. 04. 2022 v 17:38 +0200:
there is no such document, which collects all answers.
I see, so all this was a "you have to believe me because I say so" from
the very start.
I don't know what you
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke píše v Pá 08. 04. 2022 v 17:38 +0200:
> there is no such document, which collects all answers.
I see, so all this was a "you have to believe me because I say so" from
the very start.
> E.g. I'd expect you wouldn't find it usual, if an employee (e.g. from
> Collabora)
Hi all,
The unfortunate reality is that we are now definitely too close to the
deadline to start a new budget round from scratch.
I agree that the Foundation spending must include a stricter compliance
check for CoI; I think people sitting on different sides of the table
and playing with
Hi all,
it would be great if someone would stop to unilaterally declare that a
very informative thread should end.
Censorship does not help in moving forward and we should show that we
respect the freedom that anyone should have to express their opinion
(possibly backed by facts and
Hi Andreas,
changing the subject, and the request to please move this tangential
discussion at least into a separate thread.
Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Most things are usual in the most developed countries and logical by
> good judgement.
>
That's not an appropriate comment. Our community calls
Hi Kendy, all,
Am 07.04.22 um 17:21 schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke píše v Čt 07. 04. 2022 v 16:56 +0200:
Applying the above, the CoI'd deputy is not CoI'd any more when
representing the non-CoI'd director, correct?
No, because the reprenting deputy has the CoI in his
Hello,
Florian Effenberger wrote on 06.04.22 at 08:15:
in the private part of Monday's board call, the Board of Directors
discussed the concerns raised with regards to the budgetting process.
The Board decided to run another approval vote on the preliminary budget
for 2022, as all board
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke píše v Čt 07. 04. 2022 v 16:56 +0200:
> > Applying the above, the CoI'd deputy is not CoI'd any more when
> > representing the non-CoI'd director, correct?
>
> No, because the reprenting deputy has the CoI in his person and could
> not drop that.
I see, thank you!
Hi Kendy, all,
Am 07.04.22 um 09:27 schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke píše v St 06. 04. 2022 v 18:11 +0200:
Suppose you were in the Board with me as a deputy, I was missing in
a
meeting, and you were to represent me.
Are you suddenly becoming a Collabora employee or
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke píše v St 06. 04. 2022 v 18:11 +0200:
> > Suppose you were in the Board with me as a deputy, I was missing in
> > a
> > meeting, and you were to represent me.
> >
> > Are you suddenly becoming a Collabora employee or contractor or
> > affiliate in any other way? Or
Hi Kendy, all,
Am 06.04.22 um 17:38 schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke píše v St 06. 04. 2022 v 17:05 +0200:
b) It doesn't help, if a deputy board member tries to jump in for a
board member, because it represents the board member (with all
consequences including CoI). If the
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke píše v St 06. 04. 2022 v 17:05 +0200:
> b) It doesn't help, if a deputy board member tries to jump in for a
> board member, because it represents the board member (with all
> consequences including CoI). If the member is not able to vote (e.g.
> because of CoI), there
Hi Andreas,
thanks for your review and comments.
It seems like we replied nearly at the same time as I made my vote
conditional to a change of process that permanently fixes the issues you
mentioned.
The change of process needs to start from the ESC, from where anyway
very valuable input
Hello,
Am 06.04.22 um 08:15 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Hello,
in the private part of Monday's board call, the Board of Directors
discussed the concerns raised with regards to the budgetting process.
The Board decided to run another approval vote on the preliminary
budget for 2022, as all
I support this preliminary budget but with conditions as there is not
enough time to review the entire process by the time we have to file it
at the end of April.
Multiple times in the past two years, at least, concerns have been
raised in regards to the way items are being put forward, voted
In my opinion budget is already fine. I support it.Ayhan YALÃINSOY, Deputy Member of the Board of DirectorsThe Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DEGemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen RechtsLegal details:
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 08:15 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
On behalf of the Board, I therefore call for the following VOTE:
Approval of the preliminary budget for 2022
+1 approve
--
László Németh, Member of the Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin,
On 2022-04-06 at 09:16, Florian Effenberger wrote:
On behalf of the Board, I therefore call for the following VOTE:
Approval of the preliminary budget for 2022
as summarized in https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/dlUqWosS6dnXs8bWoXl2vC6a
and discussed in the private board meeting on 2022-03-28
+1
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 08:15 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> On behalf of the Board, I therefore call for the following VOTE:
>
> Approval of the preliminary budget for 2022
+1 approve
--
Caolán McNamara, Member of the Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707
Hello,
in the private part of Monday's board call, the Board of Directors
discussed the concerns raised with regards to the budgetting process.
The Board decided to run another approval vote on the preliminary budget
for 2022, as all board members and deputies who might bid on the
approved
20 matches
Mail list logo
