Hi Kendy,
that's an interesting turn.
I guess you could have helped out Michael Meeks 3 months ago as it
seemed to be such a big issue for him, I mean he's your boss so it would
be natural for any employee to help out if he can't find a way to do it.
It is also interesting to see that you
Hi Kendy,
On 25/05/2022 14:18, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi píše v St 25. 05. 2022 v 13:41 +0200:
Michael Meeks made a completely different proposal to employ a
mentor.
That is not my reading of the proposal.
You may have missed a few details:
The proposal is: "Hire a
Hello,
Jan Holesovsky píše v St 25. 05. 2022 v 14:18 +0200:
> To me it seems like those two proposals can be merged together to
> create something good for TDF, if there is a will for that. And
> there is from my side.
And to show I mean it, I've converted the document to an editable
version.
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi píše v St 25. 05. 2022 v 13:41 +0200:
> Michael Meeks made a completely different proposal to employ a
> mentor.
That is not my reading of the proposal.
Also what I like about the proposal is that it addresses my questions I
had wrt. the tasking and management; where
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi píše v St 25. 05. 2022 v 12:13 +0200:
> I've been waiting for Kendy to propose improvements for the past 3
> months but I'm yet to receive some.
I see - I was waiting for the Board Working group being set up, as was
proposed by Emiliano, and as seemed to me as the agreed
Hi,
On 25/05/2022 12:48, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Paolo, all,
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
On 25/05/2022 10:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
To reiterate the question, is that something the two of you would be
willing to collaborate on?
It seems like you missed my previous answer:
Hi Paolo, all,
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> On 25/05/2022 10:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > To reiterate the question, is that something the two of you would be
> > willing to collaborate on?
> It seems like you missed my previous answer:
>
>
Hi,
On 25/05/2022 10:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Paolo, hi Kendy,
I wrote:
Could I ask the two of you to work out a joint proposal, how to
finalize the document?
It could be a working group or a shared, editable document, or
something else entirely - but would be great to see this
Hi Paolo, hi Kendy,
I wrote:
> Could I ask the two of you to work out a joint proposal, how to
> finalize the document?
>
> It could be a working group or a shared, editable document, or
> something else entirely - but would be great to see this finished
> soonish, and with wide board support.
>
HI,
On 23/05/2022 14:01, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 23/05/2022 13:07:
On 23/05/2022 12:57, Cor Nouws wrote:
It is not the responsibility of the board to micromanage the team.
To evaluate the quality of your proposal.
It would have been the responsibility of other
Hi,
On 23/05/2022 14:30, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Can I repeat my request to get a small group (e.g. Paolo, Kendy as
representatives of the two opposing sides here) to first agree on a
workable process, to quickly iterate the proposal to something we can
all support?
First of all, why are you
Hi Paolo, hi Kendy, all,
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> > Hence my proposal for another approach, that can well result in a
> > similar situation, but that you sadly didn't respond to for the third or
> > fourth time.
>
> You stated that I should have answered questions, that in my opinion are
> answered
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 23/05/2022 13:07:
On 23/05/2022 12:57, Cor Nouws wrote:
It is not the responsibility of the board to micromanage the team.
To evaluate the quality of your proposal.
It would have been the responsibility of other fellow members of the
board to contribute
On 23/05/2022 12:57, Cor Nouws wrote:
It is not the responsibility of the board to micromanage the team.
To evaluate the quality of your proposal.
It would have been the responsibility of other fellow members of the
board to contribute to a proposal but you may have noticed that the
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 23/05/2022 12:49:
Hi Cor,
On 23/05/2022 12:37, Cor Nouws wrote:
It is the boards responsibility to evaluate that.
It is not the responsibility of the board to micromanage the team.
To evaluate the quality of your proposal.
The board has an employees oversight
Hi Cor,
On 23/05/2022 12:37, Cor Nouws wrote:
It is the boards responsibility to evaluate that.
It is not the responsibility of the board to micromanage the team.
The board has an employees oversight group which already conducts
appraisals which, when conducted in a fair and objective way,
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 23/05/2022 11:39:
part of the process of providing constructive feedback is to evaluate
objectively the information available and then propose improvements.
Then who says what is objective evaluation and what is not?
...
As described in the document I'm sure
Hi Cor,
On 23/05/2022 02:03, Cor Nouws wrote:
I think clarifying this is useful. From what I have read, I could
easily conclude that mails that give ideas on where developers could
work on, are considered to be 'constructive feedback', and that mails
with questions about how we the work of
Hi Paolo,
Cor Nouws wrote on 14/05/2022 00:11:
Hi,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 13/05/2022 11:15:
...
I haven't received any constructive feedback for a while so I presumed
This puzzles me, Paolo. What do you consider as "constructive feedback"?
I think clarifying this is useful. From what I
Hi,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 13/05/2022 11:15:
...
I haven't received any constructive feedback for a while so I presumed
This puzzles me, Paolo. What do you consider as "constructive feedback"?
Cheers
Cor
--
Cor Nouws, member Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188,
Hi Tuomas,
On 13/05/2022 18:45, Tuomas Hietala wrote:
Hello Paolo,
Thank you for working on this proposal. As a member of TDF, I fully
agree that more investment is needed in RTL, CTL and CJK in order to
make LibreOffice useful for the next two billion or so people and
potentially grow the
Hello Paolo,
Thank you for working on this proposal. As a member of TDF, I fully
agree that more investment is needed in RTL, CTL and CJK in order to
make LibreOffice useful for the next two billion or so people and
potentially grow the community of contributors. I'd imagine this could
also
Hi Caolan,
On 13/05/2022 13:51, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 14:29 +0200, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Hi all,
after receiving quite a few comments and suggestions it seems like is
time to publish what, hopefully, is the final version of the proposal
to add 2 in-house developers to
On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 14:29 +0200, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after receiving quite a few comments and suggestions it seems like is
> time to publish what, hopefully, is the final version of the proposal
> to add 2 in-house developers to TDF's team:
>
>
Hi all,
On 12/05/2022 21:15, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
It could be a working group or a shared, editable document, or
something else entirely - but would be great to see this finished
soonish, and with wide board support.
As we started the project in an open and transparent way I'm sure
Hi Paolo, hi Kendy,
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Paolo Vecchi píše v Čt 12. 05. 2022 v 14:29 +0200:
> > I have received no additional constructive feedback from the board
> > since
> > the last published version so I assume that the proposal will be
> > promptly approved as a new strategic project
Hi Kendy,
On 12/05/2022 18:29, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
If the Board working group is not going to be set up, I still have some
feedback I'd like to share. Should I send it here instead?
It has been communicated to send comments by email but nothing has
arrived since a while from the board.
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi píše v Čt 12. 05. 2022 v 14:29 +0200:
> I have received no additional constructive feedback from the board
> since
> the last published version so I assume that the proposal will be
> promptly approved as a new strategic project and the team will be
> kindly
> asked to
Hi all,
after receiving quite a few comments and suggestions it seems like is
time to publish what, hopefully, is the final version of the proposal to
add 2 in-house developers to TDF's team:
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/sfJeNq7H9GS8YPe
The most significant changes have been
29 matches
Mail list logo
