Varun,
Sponsors ar in the AB. The BoD is for contributors, and you can be both. We
would not be the first ones to hzve that model btw, gnome has it.
Charles.
Le 19 nov. 2010, 4:09 AM, Varun Mittal varunmitta...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi All,
I didn't mean sponsors will have more seats. I meant
Hello all,
Please do take a look -again- at the bylaws that I just updated:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/CommunityBylaws
My modifications do not alter the text in any substantial way, however
they add four points:
- the ESC rules get clarified esp. regarding the election of the
Chairman,
Hi All,
I didn't mean sponsors will have more seats. I meant sponsors should have
some representation on board. There would be elections for rest of the seats
with a predefined procedure.
Why do you expect a sponsor to pour several million $ when you don't even
let them participate in the
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:40 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Members get the right to vote, and to elect other
Members, on a one member, one vote basis
- that really was the question, not specific logistics.
Great, no need to follow up any further on this here, for me.
Best wishes,
Drew
--
Hi All,
Maybe we can have a JCP like system wherein all members vote.
We can also give the sponsors a particular number of seats ( non-veto
powers) to the sponsors who have supported it .
I propose not exactly a JCP like system but we can look at a modified
version of JCP voting system
What do
