Dear list,
this email is the occasional reminder, that at TDF, we strive to:
- be inclusive, and patient
- recognise each other as humans (with our different quirks &
cultures), and don't assume we stand for our group, company, or
nationality
- try to resolve personal conflicts privately (if
Hi Marina,
Marina Latini wrote:
> The license is "EUPL-1.1" but looking at some of the subfolders I found for
> example also mentions to GNU LGPLv2 [1].
>
Yep, that's part of the LibreOffice l10n tools, that Samuel was
cloning recently from there (and as such a build-time, not a runtime
Hi Emiliano,
Emiliano Vavassori wrote on 28/11/2022 22:55:
Il 27/11/22 17:41, Cor Nouws ha scritto:
Let me clarify that I did NOT take any part on the drafting of such
proposal, nor I do approve or support it or even part of it.
I clearly wrote to the other directors involved to
Hi all,
it's sad to see that the board is not willing or able to report to the
TDF members (not even internal) on the Apple App Store numbers from the
last years. The board shows not even the will to give an interim message.
This shows the lack of respect face to face with the members.
Hi Andreas,
On 28/11/2022 17:19, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi Cor, hi all,
if a community member points on the last board meeting minutes and tell
you that it could not read any objective reasons (from you) why the
inhouse-dev proposal 3.1 not fit the purpose, it is really inappropriate
and
Hi all,
Il 27/11/22 17:41, Cor Nouws ha scritto:
Then, I've been busy recently, among others working on another proposal
of course with great support from others.
Let me clarify that I did NOT take any part on the drafting of such
proposal, nor I do approve or support it or even part of it.
Dear people,
Cor Nouws wrote on 27/11/2022 17:41:
I promise that will be posted soon - ultimately tomorrow - allowing us
to start the process of hiring by the end of the week, I hope.
In the mean time, there is a mail 'New proposal for hiring in-house
developers' on the list tdf-internal.
Hi Uwe,
On 27/11/2022 18:55, Uwe Altmann wrote:
Hi Andreas
While you don't like answers in private mail I post it on this list.
Am 27.11.22 um 16:44 schrieb Andreas Mantke:
I'm curious to read own statements from the 'several of the community' here.
Maybe most of us follow the golden rule
Hi Cor, all,
Am 28.11.22 um 12:06 schrieb Cor Nouws:
In the mean time, there is a mail 'New proposal for hiring in-house
developers' on the list tdf-internal.
Why do you go to tdf-internal after an open exchange of opinions already
on the board-discuss list?
It seems to me hiding away that
Hi all,
On 28/11/2022 12:06, Cor Nouws wrote:
Dear people,
Cor Nouws wrote on 27/11/2022 17:41:
I promise that will be posted soon - ultimately tomorrow - allowing
us to start the process of hiring by the end of the week, I hope.
In the mean time, there is a mail 'New proposal for hiring
Hi Cor, hi all,
if a community member points on the last board meeting minutes and tell
you that it could not read any objective reasons (from you) why the
inhouse-dev proposal 3.1 not fit the purpose, it is really inappropriate
and impertinent to point in the answer only on this meeting
11 matches
Mail list logo
