Hi Juha,
On 06/11/17 16:48, Juha Sointusalo wrote:
The reason I tested on LHC is that I wanted to test on real world
apps, LHC has real world apps and I have already signed up there.
That's all. Maybe LHC-dev would have been better choice or maybe I
should have asked you for permission
David:
I saw your updated 26200 zip files from last night, and I'll call them "Release
3" (since you keep reusing the same filenames).
I just concluded my testing of this "Release 3" 26200 version, and everything
that I tested worked well. LHC VMs are able to resume in 5.2, and start new
5.2.
On 6 November 2017 at 10:17, Laurence wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
> On 05/11/17 10:14, Jacob Klein wrote:
>
> David / Juha / Rom:
>
> I have concluded my testing (took about 6 hours), and 26200 has some serious
> problems!
>
> Attached is a .zip of my full results, across my
Hi Jacob,
I am not a fan of using the word hacked. It suggests corners are being
cut. We are trying to do things correctly. The modified code is in a
fork and the changes were provided as a PR over 4 months ago. We used
our dev and prod projects to test the changes and have been running this
Hi Laurence,
2 things.
1) I usually only do RNA World tasks (which rarely have VMs available), and set
No New Tasks for any other VM project (because I want to give the RNA World
monster task the best chance to complete successfully). But here, I needed a
simple way to get new VM tasks, to
Hi guys,
How or when are updated PO templates from locale/templates propagated to
Transifex? IIRC there was some automated bridge that was supposed to do
this periodically.
Thanks,
Oliver
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
Hi Jacob,
On 05/11/17 10:14, Jacob Klein wrote:
David / Juha / Rom:
I have concluded my testing (took about 6 hours), and 26200 has some serious
problems!
Attached is a .zip of my full results, across my testing with LHC@Home and RNA
World. It includes a results summary, results detail