[boost] Re: Has www.boost.org been hacked?

Raoul Gough wrote: Note that I only see the extra HTML when I download the page from Internet Explorer (version is 6.0.2600.IS). Opera shows a clean version of the page. I guess this suggests my IE has a virus, unless of course the web server only sends the Trojan to particular browsers.

[boost] Re: Boost spirit and embedded visual c++ 4.0

James Curran wrote: Kai Strempel wrote: Is it possible to use the boost spirit library with the micrsoft embedded visual c++ 4.0 compiler? I haven't try it now. But perhaps anybody knows something about that compiler together with boost spirit!! I have no first-hand knowledge, but I

[boost] Re: Formal Review: Command Line Config library

Vladimir Prus wrote: Holger Grund wrote: It expands to 13103077 (RTM). Thanks! BTW, what's RTM? Release To Manufacturing. -cd ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Re: [filesystem] new functions proposals

James Curran wrote: Vladimir Prus wrote: The intent is to get/change the part of leaf name after the first dot. um.. After the FIRST dot or the LAST dot. In Win32, james.m.curran.txt the extention is txt, not m.curran.txt Note too that on Windows/NTFS, names like

[boost] Re: boost/limits.hpp Itanium2 RC_1_30_0

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote: If evaluating the output of the code below counts as a quick-and-easy-and-conclusive test the result is that the Itanium2 must be BOOST_LITTLE_ENDIAN like the i386 and Alpha lines. I.e. my patch needs to be revised (see below). Remember that Itanium(2) can use

[boost] Re: 1.30.0 branch-for-release complete

Beman Dawes wrote: At 04:01 PM 3/3/2003, Mark Rodgers wrote: How many extra people would be encourage to test the beta? Good question. Are there others interested in a beta? I'd love to see beta releases (ZIP'd packaged like a full release). -cd

[boost] Re: Re: Regression progress; Win32

Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Curiosity got the better of me, and I did an experimental run on build 2292. Looks pretty good. A vast improvement over prior releases. Problems noted: * Missing overloads for long long. *

[boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This morning's Win32 regression tests have been posted. Looking at the diff, http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-diff.html, there are still some worries: An aside - Since 1.30.0 will

[boost] Re: is_convertible and vc7.1 final beta

David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Apparently, vc7.1 final beta fails to handle is_convertible properly under some circumstances. I tried searching a little bit for workarounds and came up empty. If anyone else would like to try,

[boost] Re: Re: is_convertible and vc7.1 final beta

David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:uvg0vjjrc.fsf@boost- How come I don't have build 2346? I've been on the Microsoft alpha program. Just lucky, I guess ;-) Apparently they only sent 2346 to people who'd submitted more than 'X' bug reports via BetaPlace. Does this

[boost] Re: Call for Volunteers [license review]

David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This is a formal call for volunteers to fill out a few of the open-source license evaluations at http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License OCLC Research Public

[boost] Re: implicit_cast inventor

Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm all for bending over backwards to protect Booster's intellectual property rights, but I having a lot of trouble applying IP concepts to such a posting. Am I off-base here? I think you're spot-on,