Hi,
I have a small patch to is_convertible.hpp that will allow a version of
KCC (__EDG_VERSION__ == 243) to use the *almost* ideal implementation of
is_convertible. The current design only uses the ideal implementation for
__EDG_VERSION__ >= 245, and the current choice fails to compile for me.
David Abrahams wrote:
> I don't understand it, but Ron Garcia seems to have a fondness for
> checking duplicates of information that is hosted elsewhere into his
> library's tree.
Since you and I previously discussed why multi_array has a private
copy of iterator_adaptors, I'm assuming a ":-)" g
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
> Thanks to Dave Abrahams, Diane Cabell, Devin Smith, and Eva Chen, we now
> have a pretty close to final draft of a new Boost Software License.
>
I am glad to hear that some folks have been working on this. These issues
are quite important and might make
On Wed, 14 May 2003, Lucas Galfaso wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> is anyone considering the addition of an arbitrary precision number library?
In short, yes.
Several C++ implementations of arbitrary magnitude integers (bignums or
bigints) are laying around Boost, but none have been proposed for revie
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 07:11 AM 3/12/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> >Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> >
> >> currently the constructors test of the multi array library fails for
> >> VACPP6. This is due to the fact that the test uses an unsigned int
> where
> >> a size_type
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Eric Friedman wrote:
> Ronald Garcia wrote:
> > In addition, compiling with Intel C++ 7.0 under strict ansi compliance
> > (-ansi) revealed the following nits as well:
> [snip]
> > I've enclosed patches (unified diffs) for these.
>
Hi,
In reading through the variant docs, I noticed a requirement that at least
two types must be supported by the variant. Is this meant for ease of
library implementation, or is this a means of protecting programmers from
themselves? :-)
It may not make sense for a human programmer to instanti
Hi,
I have been testing out some example programs from the variant tutorial.
First, I ran across some errors in the code shown in the documentation
for the "first variant program."
(From GCC 2.95.2)
ex1.cpp:17: `which' undeclared (first use this function)
ex1.cpp:48: `a_printer' undeclared (firs
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Eric Friedman wrote:
> Ronald Garcia wrote:
> > I am attempting to use GCC 3.2 to review the variant library, but I am
> > getting compile-time errors:
> >
> > boost/variant.hpp:569: no class template named `mpl' in
> > `boost
Hello,
I am attempting to use GCC 3.2 to review the variant library, but I am
getting compile-time errors:
boost/variant.hpp:569: no class template named `mpl' in
`boost::detail::variant
'
boost/variant.hpp:569: parse error before `,' token
boost/variant.hpp:569: template argument 1 is invali
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> From: "Ronald Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > It looks like the intel compiler still supports long long when used with
> > the -ansi option. I searched around for good specs, but could find no
> > definiti
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:26 PM [GMT+1=CET],
> Ronald Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 PM [GMT+1=CET],
> >
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 PM [GMT+1=CET],
> Ronald Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
> >
> > > [2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
> [2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote:
> >
> >I would like to request the addition of the -ansi flag to the
> >[ ... ]
>
> Some questions...
>
> Are the errors in Boost code, or your code?
err...both (boost code that happens
Howdy,
I would like to request the addition of the -ansi flag to the
intel configuration file for boost build. I have received some bug
reports that don't show up unless that flag is enabled. Since I
understand little of how boost build works, what follows is a patch
suggestion. Someone else
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
> [2003-01-27] Ronald Garcia wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Howdy,
> >
> >I'm trying to use boost build with the intel c++ compiler under linux.
> >My compiler is installed in /usr/local/intel, but boost build appears t
Howdy,
I'm trying to use boost build with the intel c++ compiler under linux.
My compiler is installed in /usr/local/intel, but boost build appears to
be looking for it in /opt/intel. Is there a way to specify the compiler
location as an option to boost build? According to the docs, the only
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Roland Richter wrote:
> In multi_array's reference manual, Table 2,
> the three links in the sentence
>
> Otherwise it models _Random Access Traversal Iterator_,
> _Readable Iterator_, and _Writable Iterator_.
>
> seem to be broken.
>
Thanks for the note. Those links refer
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Could you test if the following compiles successfully with the latest CVS
> sources?
> [...]
The code you posted compiles under KCC both with and without the --strict
command-line parameter. Hope this helps, and thank you.
Cheers,
ron
__
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> Ronald Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a way to get this to work without previously running the entire
> > boost test suite? I just want to test one library.
>
> For testing one library, forget about
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Ronald Garcia wrote:
> > Howdy. I am trying to use KCC in strict mode to compile some
> > code that depends on type traits.
>
> Which version? Does it support partial template specialization/template
> template paramete
Howdy. I am trying to use KCC in strict mode to compile some code that
depends on type traits. I am getting a large quantity of errors along
these lines:
"/u/garcia/src/boost/boost/type_traits/is_volatile.hpp", line 33: error:
identifier "is_volatile_rebind" is undefined
BOOST_TT_AU
Howdy,
I'm trying to get the regression system up by following the directions
in the docs (boost/more/regression.html#Execution) and running locally
and I'm
having some problems with the report generation. I'm under the impression
that bjam is running my tests as expected, but I'm having trouble
IIRC, the array_traits library was pulled off of the boost main page
and moved into the sandbox a while ago. What is its current status? Is
being actively developed or is it currently in stasis?
cheers,
ron
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://li
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> Helmut Zeisel submitted an unlimited integer library 3 July 2001,
> big_int_20010821.zip
>
> and more recently Roland Garcia submitted bigint.zip, which works to compute
> factorial
> using MCVS 7.0 with trivial changes.
>
> big integers are an import
25 matches
Mail list logo
