RE: [boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-19 Thread Rozental, Gennadiy
> I think this is just a mistake in Gennadiy's build for Win32. > > On Win32, a DLL (boost_prg_exec_monitor.dll) cannot link to a symbol > in an executable, period. To make this work, the user has to supply a > DLL containing cpp_main. Shared libraries build indeed does not work on win32 platfor

Re: [boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-19 Thread David Abrahams
"Victor A. Wagner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd be happy to help out with the regression tests but currently when > I get everything from the CVS repository, then simply tell it to: > > bjam "-sTOOLS=vc7 msvc vc71" >bjam.log > > I get 32 things which fail: > > ...failed updating 36 targe

Re: [boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-19 Thread Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
I'd be happy to help out with the regression tests but currently when I get everything from the CVS repository, then simply tell it to: bjam "-sTOOLS=vc7 msvc vc71" >bjam.log I get 32 things which fail: ...failed updating 36 targets... ...skipped 36 targets... ...updated 852 targets... from th

Re: [boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-17 Thread Beman Dawes
At 11:21 PM 2/15/2003, Carl Daniel wrote: >"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> This morning's Win32 regression tests have been posted. Looking at the >> diff, http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-diff.html, >> there a

Re: [boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-16 Thread Beman Dawes
At 08:22 AM 2/16/2003, Beman Dawes wrote: >At 05:33 PM 2/15/2003, Gennadiy Rozental wrote: > > >> * test lib has three tests failing all compilers; at least some of >these > >> passed until recently. > > > >Note that errors_handling_test and results_resport_test failures does not > >lead ot any e

Re: [boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-16 Thread Beman Dawes
At 05:33 PM 2/15/2003, Gennadiy Rozental wrote: >> * test lib has three tests failing all compilers; at least some of these >> passed until recently. > >Note that errors_handling_test and results_resport_test failures does not >lead ot any error messages. >So I would recommend to perform clean bu

Re: [boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-16 Thread Beman Dawes
At 11:21 PM 2/15/2003, Carl Daniel wrote: >"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> This morning's Win32 regression tests have been posted. Looking at the >> diff, http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-diff.html, >> there a

[boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-15 Thread Carl Daniel
"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This morning's Win32 regression tests have been posted. Looking at the > diff, http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-diff.html, > there are still some worries: An aside - Since 1.30.0

[boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-15 Thread Gennadiy Rozental
I fixed config/test/Jamfile to use proper names of Boost.Test libraries. How does this thing work in regression testing? Gennadiy. ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Re: Regression progress; Win32

2003-02-15 Thread Gennadiy Rozental
> * test lib has three tests failing all compilers; at least some of these > passed until recently. Note that errors_handling_test and results_resport_test failures does not lead ot any error messages. So I would recommend to perform clean build of those two. test_fp_comparisons IS failing on all