If the issue concerns you this much, you might propose something along the
lines of BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS.
That is, you might try: BOOST_NO_RTTI anyone?
- Eric
I did. As a user defined parameter. Terrie made a point that it should be
config parameter cause some embedded compiler indeed does
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
5. Usage std::type_info for reflection
I don't think we should enforce RTTI for the variant users. We should
be able to postpone the decision on what kind of reflection
information user want till instantiation time.
Please elaborate on this point. FYI, the
