[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| En réponse à Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
| [snip]
|
| | On a more general side, please keep in mind that *signaling* NaNs are meant to
| | trap when used (used can be a simple copy, the standard leaves it
| | implementation-defined).
|
| They trap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Sorry for the late reply, I was enjoying some peaceful holidays.
There is no reason for sorrying.
| En réponse à Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
| Guillaume Melquiond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
| |
| |
En réponse à Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
| We are speaking about quiet NaNs here. And so I
| was justifying why the interval library computes v != v in order to
| detect quiet NaNs. I never intended to speak about signaling NaNs.
The point of my mail was that it is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| En réponse à Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
| [snip]
|
| | We are speaking about quiet NaNs here. And so I
| | was justifying why the interval library computes v != v in order to
| | detect quiet NaNs. I never intended to speak about signaling NaNs.
|
|
En réponse à Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
| On a more general side, please keep in mind that *signaling* NaNs are meant to
| trap when used (used can be a simple copy, the standard leaves it
| implementation-defined).
They trap only when operands of arithmetic operations.
Guillaume Melquiond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
|
| Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
| news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| jvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Dear boosters,
| |
| | seems like this code
| |
| | template
Joel de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
|
| Yes. It is an incorrect (unfortunately popular)
| implementation.
|
| Right. We should say that more often. It is incorrect
| however popular.
|
|
Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joel de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
Yes. It is an incorrect (unfortunately popular)
implementation.
Right. We should say that more often. It is
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
Yes. It is an incorrect (unfortunately popular)
implementation.
Right. We should say that more often. It is incorrect
however popular.
Most compilers provide a non standard extension for this
Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Dear boosters,
|
| seems like this code
|
| template typename T
| bool is_nan( const T v )
| {
| return std::numeric_limitsT::has_quiet_NaN (v != v);
| }
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Dear boosters,
|
| seems like this code
|
| template typename T
| bool is_nan( const T v )
| {
|
11 matches
Mail list logo
