At Monday 2003-07-21 01:48, you wrote:
At Sunday 2003-07-20 04:29, you wrote:
[deleted]
Yes, I remain unconvinced ;-)
This is because some compilers do not provide such a FUNCTION facility.
VC6 is one of them. What should I do for it?
don't do anything. VC6 has been replaced. If you want
Hi Peter,
If a compiler has a current function facility but is not currently
supported
by current_function.hpp, if you show '(unknown)' users of this compiler
will
spot the problem and submit a patch, or at least report it to us.
If not, they may not even realize that the library could have
On the other hand, perhaps you have a use case that clearly demonstrates
the
need for BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION?
The SMART_ASSERT library clearly needs it.
The idea is: when an assertion fails, in case BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION holds a
meaningful value, I want to show it. Otherwise, not.
John Torjo wrote:
On the other hand, perhaps you have a use case that clearly
demonstrates
the
need for BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION?
The SMART_ASSERT library clearly needs it.
The idea is: when an assertion fails, in case BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION
holds a meaningful value, I want to show it.
