"Eric Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave (and others):
>
> Eric Friedman wrote:
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE is great!
>> >
>> > However:
>> [snip]
>> > // specialization
>> > template <>
>> > int f( /*what goes here?*/ )
>> >
>-Original Message-
>From: Aleksey Gurtovoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 4:27 AM
>To: Boost mailing list
>Subject: [boost] bind/lambda - unsupported use case?
>Consider the following snippet:
>
>void show_warning( message_dialog const&, user_message );
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
>
> | What is the problem adapting pair of iterators to scalar vectors to
> produce
> | an iterator with complex value type?
>
> The problem is you can hardly adapt a pair. So using
> iterator_adaptor (the new class
Misha Bergal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It appears that the tagging step for Version_1_30_1 got messed up
>> somehow.
>>
>> Please have a look at RC_1_30_2, which is our release candidate for
>> Version 1_30_2, and let me know if there are any pr
http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8470/cujweb0309nasonov/
--
Alexander Nasonov
Remove minus and all between minus and at from my e-mail for timely response
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
# if BOOST_WORKAROUND( __BORLANDC__, >= 0x0560 )
I would just like to point out that if _USE_OLD_RW_STL is defined, BCB6
uses the roguewave STL from BCB5 and so doesn't have this _STL/std::
conflict. So it may be worth introducing that into the #if somehow.
(I don't define this because I prefer
"Pavel Vozenilek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I need the ability to do interprocess synchronization through file
> > locking, c.f. Java.File.createNewFile and Java.File.deleteOnExit:
> ...
> > On Posix, the first one
> The main problem with shared_ptr 1.30.x and below is that the single- and
> multithreaded versions are incompatible. The CVS version is now binary
> compatible on Windows, so 1.31 will "work" across different threading
> models; still, the correct default for Borland should probably be to do a
>
That's a cool idea. It's a lot prettier than using the preprocessor.
Does anyone know whether or not a language solution is being considered
for this or variable class template arguments?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Philippe A.
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 07:37 AM 8/11/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >Aleksey Gurtovoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Beman Dawes wrote:
> >>> Assuming I'm release manager for 1.31.0, I'm going to publish explicit
> >>> release criteria for key platform/compiler pair
Hi,
I would like to say one word about the VCF library.
I know it is totally unknown to most of people.
I didn't see any comments beside the one of Bohdan.
VCF is an extremely good GUI multiplatform library.
And even if it is not yet at version 1.0, yet it does let people to program very
fast wit
Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> In that case, can I release 1.30.2? I don't like having the 1.30.1
>> debacle hanging over my head.
>
>
> There are new regressions on Linux (RC_1_30_0 branch):
> http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux-rc-1_30_0/
1.30.0 boost.random did not compile on msvc6. I submitted patches right
after 1.30.0 release and they were applied to CVS, but they did not made
into 1.30.1, which is not surprising, given that random unit test is not
a part of the regression suit.
If there are plans on releasing 1.30.2 (since
E. Gladyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> It stands for 'standard'. Maybe that's a little
>> pretentious for us at
>> this early stage :) gtl would probably be better.
>> I suspect that if we
>> get to a review some people may request something
David Abrahams wrote:
> Matthias Troyer writes:
>
> > Dear Boosters,
> >
> > Since some of the applications and libraries we plan on releasing soon
> > rely on Boost features and bugfixes that are in the CVS but not in
> > Boost 1.30.[012] I wonder what the plans are for the Boost 1.31.0
> > releas
15 matches
Mail list logo
