En réponse à Jeff Garland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:31:05 -0400, Jeremy B. Maitin-Shepard wrote
Yes, of course, it is not really a union either. I think
merge_inclusive is fine.
How about maximize or maximize_duration or just max or
max_duration?
Thx for the
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 08:11:14 +0200 (CEST), gmelquio wrote
I just wanted to mention that the interval library names this
operation hull. It is a mathematically defined term since the
operation is indeed a convex hull.
Just my two eurocents,
Guillaume
Thanks, I like it. Precise and
Misha Bergal wrote:
Our results are available now.
Looking at it:
* static_assert library name got somehow replaced with libs.
This one is really nasty. We tracked it down, and it's caused by yesterday
changes in testing.jam:
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/tools/build/testing.jam,v
Paul Hamilton wrote:
One of the major problems with it is it's lack of independence from
it's primary application that it is based on - Mozilla. This is
natural from a tool that grew out of the side of another program.
I don't think there is any problems with having multiple XML based UI
Oh, just realized there is XULMaker for XUL. I haven't played with it
much, so not sure how good it is.
David Bradley
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
This gives me problems:
templateclass Tr, class Ch inline
void empty_buf(BOOST_IO_STD basic_ostringstreamCh,Tr os) {
static const std::basic_stringCh, Tr emptyStr;
os.str(emptyStr);
}
When I use something that includes this in two different dll's, and
then try to link them into
There's more to it than just creating something that can render UI
elements from XML stream.
XMLUI is a lot more than this. For one thing it's optimized for
animation (sort of like flash) so that interfaces are purely widgetless
(as I mentioned earlier).
XUL (which is actually a language, you
At Saturday 2003-08-16 06:39, you wrote:
Dave Gomboc wrote:
For example, while it is possible to think of all drives on an MS
Windows machine as being part of a single filesystem, an individual
using NTFS on
C:, FAT32 on D:, FAT16 on E:, and FAT12 on A: reasonably would not.
Not only do I
Hi,
I found a problem in execution_monitor.cpp of Boost.Test
on POSIX systems.
The file uses the sigsetjmp() and siglongjmp() functions
and the sigjmp_buf data type.
They all are defined by POSIX as an extention to the
ANSI-C standard, i.e. the interface is defined in a
header file defined by
Hi
The preliminary fsm submission has been updated:
- Added support for multi-threading and asynchronous state machines (using
boost::thread out of the box, customizable for other threading libs or even
OS-less systems)
- Updated documentation
- Fixed various minor bugs and improved code (no
I think that what is still missing in Boost is a library for reading and
writing XML files. I have such a library, though in rather preliminary
state (encodings support is missing, and also not all of XML constructs are
supported). Anyway, I have used it in some projects for e.g. reading and
Curiously I have just posted a description of what may be the cause of this.
Attached...
My suggested remedy relies on the correct value for numeric_limits::digits (not
digits10)
Paul
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
Sorry about the long post, but that seemed the easiest way.
numeric_limits::digits10 does what it says - the number that are _guaranteed_ to
be correct on output,
but that isn't what one usually wants for all _significant_ on input (and I
suggest again another numeric_limits::significant_digits10
But as Michael Caine said Not a lot of people know that - so I trust you will
explain what it does too for the benefit of us mere non-mathematical mortals!
Paul
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Sunday, August
Paul Hamilton wrote:
I don't really want to go in to too much of an argument on this list
about the difference between XUL and XMLUI. I have a ways to go before
XMLUI is open source anyway, so it's all academic anyway. At some
point I'll create a project
Neither do I, because I couldn't
Has anyone had success using Boost with the uClibc libraries? In
particular, have you got Boost.Python to work?
I am using the getting_started1.cpp example provided with Boost. I am
using Boost 1.30.0, uClibc 0.9.20 and Python 2.2.3. Note that uClibc
does not currently support a dlopen()
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 02:44:20PM -0400, Joel Young wrote:
I tried using FC++ a while ago for flexibly expressing and passing
around linear algebra pipelines and I found this lack of mutable
reference parameters to be highly constraining and insanely frustrating.
I wanted to be able to take a
I'd be interested in such library.
I think that boos::xml library should be using boost::spirit
for parsing XML streams.
Eugene
--- Wojtek Surowka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that what is still missing in Boost is a library for reading and
writing XML files. I have such a library, though
David,
We prepared the list of changes in RC_1_30_0 from 8/4/2003 to today. We've
summarized ours and don't feel that summarizing on other people behalf would
be a right thing to do. I believe that posting the changelog to the mailing
list and asking people to provide the summaries of their
Misha Bergal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David,
We prepared the list of changes in RC_1_30_0 from 8/4/2003 to today. We've
summarized ours and don't feel that summarizing on other people behalf would
be a right thing to do. I believe that posting the changelog to the mailing
list and asking
Jeff Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone had success using Boost with the uClibc libraries? In
particular, have you got Boost.Python to work?
I am using the getting_started1.cpp example provided with Boost. I am
using Boost 1.30.0, uClibc 0.9.20 and Python 2.2.3. Note that uClibc
does
I think that what is still missing in Boost is a library for reading
and
writing XML files.
I have been using expat for a while, and wrapping it in C++ classes.
It's a very capable parser and supports lot's of stuff.
My parser stuff is just done with a switch statement (since it's event
After studying my problem with this:
templateclass Tr, class Ch inline
void empty_buf(BOOST_IO_STD basic_ostringstreamCh,Tr os) {
static const std::basic_stringCh, Tr emptyStr;
os.str(emptyStr);
}
I want to post the actual link error I get back:
darwin-Link-action
Misha Bergal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David,
We prepared the list of changes in RC_1_30_0 from 8/4/2003 to today. We've
summarized ours and don't feel that summarizing on other people behalf would
be a right thing to do. I believe that posting the changelog to the mailing
list and asking
David Abrahams wrote:
Great! Here's a summary of my changes:
Boost Consulting is now hosting Boost CVS mirrors. See
http://www.boost.org/more/download.html
Bugs in regression reporting in subproject tests were fixed.
Tests are now run in the context of the user's PATH
For everyone's information, here's the status of 1.30.2 release preparation.
Current status:
Two outstanding problems with the win32 regressions (accidentally revealed
bug in testing.jam + unexpected failures for the intel-stlport
configuration) have been fixed. Consequently, as at this moment,
26 matches
Mail list logo
