I dont think so...
I guess int128_t under boost/multiprecision/cpp_int is the only viable
option.
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, 11:39 pm David Frank via Boost-users, <
boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
> especially the gnu __int128?
> Thanks,
> David.
> ___
> B
. {
7. boost::variant<__int128, char, std::string> v;
8. v = 56;
9. v = 'Y';
10. __int128 d=12;
11. std::cout < wrote:
> On 4/7/2021 2:15 PM, Anil Muthigi via Boost-users wrote:
> > I dont think so...
>
> If it is available why do you think variant wo
uot;Yashaswi raj";
> > 14.
> > std::cout << v << '\n';
> > 15.
> > }
> >
> > If u replace __int128 with int in the variant variable, it seems to work
> > just fine...
>
> My test with gcc-10.2 and clang-linu
amp; o, const __int128& x) functionality. I
> tried putting your functionality in namespace boost but it still did not pick
> it up.
>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, 04:30 Edward Diener via Boost-users,
>>> mailto:boost-users@lists.boost.org>> wrote:
>>>
return o << (char)(x + '0'); return o << x / 10 << (char)(x % 10
> + '0'); }
> int main()
> {
> boost::variant<__int128, char, std::string> v;
> v = 56;
> v = 'Y';
> __int128 d=12;
> std::cout < std::cout <<
Me too
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, 20:04 shady mohamed via Boost-users, <
boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
> I need to talk with mentor of this project to discuss the competency test
> ___
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users@lists.boost.org
> https://li
