--- David Hobby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let it go, and leave the old list alone.
Or don't let it go, but call it for what it is. Their is no reason to sculk
away, but resolution requires personal honesty, humility, and dignity.
Come one Jeroen, do the honerable thing and step up. You wouldn
Jeroen van Baardwijk wrote:
>
> At Stardate 20030610.1312, David Hobby wrote:
>
> > The analogy that comes to mind is somewhat like this. Your dog
> > came and cr*pped in another's yard (list). I imagine that most people
> > who see someone's dog do this are tempted to pick the results
At Stardate 20030610.1312, David Hobby wrote:
The analogy that comes to mind is somewhat like this. Your dog
came and cr*pped in another's yard (list). I imagine that most people
who see someone's dog do this are tempted to pick the results up with a
shovel and throw it in the owner's
At Stardate 20030610.1315, Jim wrote:
Now, fascist and list-dictator that you are, you gave Erik NO warnings and
not even 5 minutes to express his opinions, you just dictatorially banned
him. And his actions were much less than misbehaviors that you have made
REPEATEDLY. In fact, his actions we
x27;t drag all their mental problems with them into the list. I
think we deserve a list that isn't ruled by an insane dictator.
--- On Wed 06/11, Jeroen van Baardwijk < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Jeroen van Baardwijk [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Da
> >Seems to me Jeroen is responsible. He is the listowner, and he has been
> >repeatedly sending multiple spam emails to around 100 people.
>
> Significantly less than 100, actually...
Then how did I make the cut? I mostly LURK on the other
list. PLEASE remove me from your spam-list.
At Stardate 20030611.0116, Doyle Brunson wrote:
Seems to me Jeroen is responsible. He is the listowner, and he has been
repeatedly sending multiple spam emails to around 100 people.
Significantly less than 100, actually...
These people have kindly asked him to stop the spamming, and he has
ref
That is just the point. Neither does anyone else.
--- Richard Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jan said:
>
> > I think that this whole buisness needs to be played out for it ever to
> > end.
>
> I used to think that too, but it went off for many years over on the
> other list. If it takes
Jan said:
> I think that this whole buisness needs to be played out for it ever to
> end.
I used to think that too, but it went off for many years over on the
other list. If it takes more than incidents like this every month or
two for years for it to be "played out" then I don't think I want to
I don't think that would be the most benificial.
I think that this whole buisness needs to be played out for it ever to end.
After all how would you feel in the same position? I know how I would feel.
The question is, does Mr. van Baardwijk actualy want it to end? Can he humble
himself to acc
Jorpho said:
> None of these messages really had any good reason to appear on this
> list. It is also not immediately obvious who is responsible for any of
> these messages - not Mr. van Baardwijk, nor this Arnett person I have
> never heard of otherwise - unless the From address provides any rea
Seems to me Jeroen is responsible. He is the listowner, and he has been repeatedly
sending multiple spam emails to around 100 people. These people have kindly asked him
to stop the spamming, and he has refused. It is ironic that you talk about this being
a "fresh" start when it seems Jeroen has
12 matches
Mail list logo
