On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 03:00:33PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
Typically people with dyslexia have a hard time getting some words
spelled close enough to correct that a spellchecker will be able to
recognize them. This problem is not propaganda,
You missed the point AND your statement
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 03:51:27PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
2) You condone a law that would prevent 62 million American citizens
from being able to get married and have children? How ironic.
Apparently you only support freedom of speech, not freedom of thought
or freedom of religion.
At 02:32 PM 7/25/2003 -0500 Julia Thompson wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
You just insulted all bigots while trying to insult me!
Personally, I'm prejudiced against bigots.
Exactly. The point being that Erik is being wholly unproductive, uncivil,
and unapologetic for equating prejudice against
- Original Message -
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: The Case for a Marriage Ammendment to the Constitution
At 12:06 AM 7/25/2003 -0500 Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
JDG poured an a$$load of
On 25 Jul 2003 at 16:05, Reggie Bautista wrote:
Bryon wrote:
I'm sort of fanatical about this - I have approximately 8-9 fans in
my (very large) PC tower case.
Have you ever considered using some form of liquid cooling?
http://store.epowerhousepc.com/cgi-bin/EPHstore.cgi?user_action=listc
Bryon Daly wrote:
Nice pics - I'm jealous! I'd love to visit Hawaii someday.
It's well worth the price. Thanks for the nice words about the pictures; my wife got
a pretty expensive digital camera for MOther's Day/our anniversary, and those pics are
from that.
Is Knight of the Dinner Table a
JDG wrote:
My position is based on the fact that I firmly believe that women
and men
are fundamentally different. I consider this differences to be
effects of
both fundamental biology, and, of course, differences in cultural
roles.
Well, duuuh! Differences in biology do not, hoever,
At 02:18 PM 7/25/2003 -0400 Jon Gabriel wrote:
Actually, its called the House-Senate Conference Committe, and its
been around for a very, very long time.
I didn't mention this because it was in the MSNBC article. Frankly, I'm not
sure why you bring it up, so it seems like a non sequiter to me.
I just got a re-confirm due to excessive bounces; this is the third time in
about 6 weeks.
What's up with this?
George A
- Original Message -
From: Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:11 AM
Subject: Arrgh!
Is anyone else having their list
At 11:48 AM 7/25/2003 -0500 Julia Thompson wrote:
JDG - Will you guys ever let it go?
Probably not. (I'm just guessing.)
Will you ever stop pointing out the EC stuff every time they mention
it? :)
Eh, probably not. I have an almost reflexive need to point out the
truth - and ultimately
At 11:42 AM 7/21/2003 -0500 Julia Thompson wrote:
What kind of blanket did you bring in? And is there some sort of
mattress or padding that they can provide for you, or will you be on the
floor? (That could get very uncomfortable if you were trying to sleep
for more than, say, 45 minutes.)
Eh,
Bryon Daly wrote:
http://home.comcast.net/~bryon.daly/M4win240.zip
http://home.comcast.net/~bryon.daly/SC2_MODS.ZIP
The installer for M4win20 doesn't seem to be working. Any suggestions?
Jim
___
Eliminate pop-ups before they appear!
Visit
At 07:52 AM 7/24/2003 -0700 Nick Arnett wrote:
Setting aside sarcasm now... I think that you may be mistake in *expecting*
the left to come up with a coherent war plan against terrorism.
I think that's Gautam's point. If, as you seem to agree, the Left is
simply incapable of coming up with a
At 08:25 PM 7/24/2003 -0400 Robert J. Chassell wrote:
I don't get this. Soldiers do not go on suicide missions because they
think they are evil. They go on such missions because they think they
are virtuous and that their actions will help their compatriots.
Can you name a real life example of
At 08:09 AM 7/21/2003 -0700 Nick Arnett wrote:
Perhaps we are at war, but under that definition, I'm having a very hard
time imagining that we will ever NOT be at war. We are not going to remove
evil from the world, I'm quite sure.
Some likely conditions;
1) The establishment of a secure, viable
At 01:02 PM 7/25/2003 + Robert J. Chassell wrote:
If that is the case, why didn't the Administration say so? Why did
the Pentagon say at the end of May that it was still intending to
investigate 700 sites? Why, throughout May, did the US government say
it was increasing the size of its
Ritu and Nick make similar points which I will respond to here.
At 12:29 PM 7/25/2003 + Robert J. Chassell wrote:
Robert J. Chassell wrote:
The phrase The British have learned suggests to a listening
public that the US President had US intelligence agencies
- Original Message -
From: Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: TI interpreation of QM
I wrote:
I'd love to see your opinion of it
when you get a chance. It's called the transactional interpretation,
and
John
Nick Arnett wrote:
If this is not the future we want to create, then shouldn't
we return to normal political discourse, in which one is
not branded a traitor for questioning the leadership. If we
can't question and criticize our leaders today, what is
going to change to allow us to
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think that without serious citizen oversight,
the
Ashcroft Justice Dept. would (or will) make a
mockery
of the Constitution. If people don't make noise
about
it, we will lose some of our civil rights and
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:49:58PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Since we are being snippy...
rest snipped
snip
(All this snipping is reminding me of the story about the 3 mythical
women who cut the strings of people's lives when their time
Julia Thompson wrote:
David Hobby wrote:
The above would have been easier to state if we had general kinship
terms based on degrees of genetic relatedness. Sibling, parent and
child are all halves. Grandparent, grandchild, aunt, uncle, niece,
nephew, half-sibling, and so on are
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert J. Chassell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't there at least one, however vaguely defined purpose to
evolution: success?
No. Purpose presupposes intent. There is no intent in the
happenstance that some of a set of erroneously self-replicated
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you think that Osama bin Laden objects to
the
same things about American foreign policy that you
do?
That's not a fair tactic in an
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Horn, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course, California Democrats, instead of doing the wise
thing and trying
to get a solid candidate in there are rallying around the
sinking ship.
You mean, like the
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? I have heard many people claim that everybody talks when
tortured. In the movies, the tortures that are applied seem so tame
and unimaginative.
How about Dustin Hoffman getting holes drilled in his teeth in
Marathon Man?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide a transcript that does not have cridbile backing.
???
Alied intelegance is considered credible.
But still your missing the point. I just can't see how an intelegant
person is hoodwinked by this rediculous
Jon Gabriel wrote:
It certainly looks to me like he's screwed and that the Democrats are
(rather stupidly, imo) pinning all their hopes on him. Then again, CA
Dems aren't coming across as geniuses in general these days. Did you
see the report yesterday about the CA state legislators
28 matches
Mail list logo
