At 07:17 AM 4/13/04, David Hobby wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
>
> Cancelled.
Could be. But they are showing an episode tonight...
Did they? Or was it pre-empted for the President's press conference?
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mai
At 08:42 AM 4/13/04, Ray Ludenia wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> Obviously the writer of this blurb has never lived with cats, since s/he
> suggests that the human may have been the "owner" of the cat . . .
>
>
> Midnight Is Currently Sitting On His Servant's Lap Maru
Humphrey is currently not si
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
>
> David Hobby wrote:
...
> > There should be some nice system of plebescites to let people
> > organize into the countries they feel like organizing into,
> > rather than being stuck with historical borders.
> >
> Yeah. What about the mexicans in occupied Mexico deciding
Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> We're scrambling quite a bit to get things working properly...
Nick--
I'm sure you're just doing all this for the practice. : )
Thanks for all the work you're putting in!
---David
___
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 04:41:23PM -0500, Dan
> Minette wrote:
> Well said. I clearly remember what you wrote before
> and in the early
> stages of the Iraq war. I think that events have
> shown me to be wrong
> about the Iraq invasion -- as you say, alt
At 04:41 PM 4/13/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote:
>I hope that my fears turn groundless, and that an Iraq that resembles
>Jordan does emerge.
This is the second time I have seen the "Jordan" analogy.Personally, I
would be at least somewhat disappointed to see Iraq turn into a
self-interested, pr
At 11:01 PM 4/12/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
> What if he had held high level
>meetings and prioritized anti-terror?
I'm going to address this point since it has now been raised by both you
and Dan, among others
I'm not sure that "high-level" meetings are a particular important
compone
I have fixed a restriction on our mail server (the new config, from the
Friday morning crash) that sent mail into a black hole if you sent it
from a host whose FQDN could not be looked up. That's an anti-spam
restriction that I copied from our secondary mail server, which has very
tight restric
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 04:41:23PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
> This post has wandered to a couple of other topics, but my point
> is that the criticism of Bush is not that he should have invaded
> Afghanistan in March, 2001. Rather, its that his plan for countering
> terrorism by focusing on coun
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_3.html
The U.S. military will withdraw most if its forces from the
Demilitarized Zone separating North and South Korea this year, an
official announced today.
The withdrawal means the United States will no longer have combat
troops anywhere on the
On Apr 13, 2004, at 10:24 AM, Damon Agretto wrote:
A question for all the members or former members of
the military on the
list: do you consider yourself more "right" or
"left" wing? My own
experience in the military suggests that for the
most part professional
military members tend to be more "
> From: Doug Pensinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> But that's not the important thing. The attacks are history
> and there is
> nothing we can do to take them back. The most important
> mistake that was
> made and is still being made is that the administration
> refuses to admit
> any cu
> From: Gautam Mukunda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You feel this way about _eight years_ of continuous
> inaction by the Clinton Administration too, or is it
> only Republicans who get blamed for inaction? Doing
> nothing after the first WTC bombing...after an attempt
> to assassinate George Bu
- Original Message -
From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:42 AM
Subject: Alternate History
>Announcing his candidacy for the 2004 Republican presidential nomination,
>Senator John McCain said today that "George W. Bush was very foolis
The Fool wrote:
Nick, the mail server is changing content type from text/plain to
multipart/mixed.
A lot of Email clients do not work well with or at all with
multipart/mixed. Also all it seems to be doing is adding .5k to every
single message. Furthermore it interferes with my ability to quote
Nick, the mail server is changing content type from text/plain to
multipart/mixed.
A lot of Email clients do not work well with or at all with
multipart/mixed. Also all it seems to be doing is adding .5k to every
single message. Furthermore it interferes with my ability to quote other
people pro
From: Tom Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Apr 13, 2004, at 9:28 AM, The Fool wrote:
Guatam
> You might even have been right. The evidence that the
> Taliban were dangerous on September 10th of 2001 was
> far weaker than the evidence
On Apr 13, 2004, at 9:28 AM, The Fool wrote:
You might even have been right. The evidence that the
Taliban were dangerous on September 10th of 2001 was
far weaker than the evidence that Saddam Hussein was
dangerous, come to think of it.
Dangerous to who? At least as dangerous to the people of A
From: Gautam Mukunda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You do recall where the
Cole was bombed, right?
In an area of the world that is very close to: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi
Arabia, all of which are state sponsors of terrorism, and are not
necessarily friendly to the U.S.. Also an area of the world whe
--- The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And who did you _know_ was responsible for the
> Oklahoma city bombing when
> it first occurred?
I didn't. It happened in Oklahoma, which made it
difficult to know until the FBI had done its job. I
think it's unlikely that white supremacists would
attack
--
From: Gautam Mukunda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- The Fool wrote:
> We did not _know_ who was responsible for the Cole
> attack until Shrub had
> been crowned king. Or perhaps you think we should
> strike out blindly
> whenever we are attacked?
What are you talking about? _I_ knew who was
> A question for all the members or former members of
> the military on the
> list: do you consider yourself more "right" or
> "left" wing? My own
> experience in the military suggests that for the
> most part professional
> military members tend to be more "conservative" than
> "liberal," tho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 4/12/2004 9:10:45 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > What about Readers Digest? They had an article on Bin Laden sometime
> > before 9/11, I remember
> >
> > Julia
> >
> > who'd have to go to an effort to figure o
At 09:20 PM 4/12/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
>But the buck stops in the oval office. As it becomes more and more
>evident that Bush was asleep at the switch, and worse, that he refuses to
>even begin to take responsibility for his lapses, it becomes more and more
>imperitive that we spare
http://www.tnr.com/easterbrook.mhtml
04.09.04
Gregg Easterbrook
AN ALTERNATIVE HISTORY: washington, april 9, 2004. A hush fell over the
city as George W. Bush today became the first president of the United
States ever to be removed from office by impeachment. Meeting late into the
night, the
At 09:32 PM 4/12/2004 -0700 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>You might even have been right. The evidence that the
>Taliban were dangerous on September 10th of 2001 was
>far weaker than the evidence that Saddam Hussein was
>dangerous, come to think of it.
After all, at least the Iraqis were shooting at us.
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is any site with exercises in French for
> beginners?
I'm sure there is. Let me google...
You could check out:
http://www.blisslogik.com/fr/products/fitnessbliss/pro/exercises/
Regards, Ray (The Unhelpful :
___
--- The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We did not _know_ who was responsible for the Cole
> attack until Shrub had
> been crowned king. Or perhaps you think we should
> strike out blindly
> whenever we are attacked?
What are you talking about? _I_ knew who was
responsible, for goodness sakes,
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> Obviously the writer of this blurb has never lived with cats, since s/he
> suggests that the human may have been the "owner" of the cat . . .
>
>
> Midnight Is Currently Sitting On His Servant's Lap Maru
Humphrey is currently not sitting on his servant's lap. He has be
--
From: Gautam Mukunda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And now Bush comes out and says there was no iminent
> threat. This from
> the guy that went hermantile over intellegence
> provided by a few Iraqi
> ex-pats with the same agenda as himsef.
>
>
--
From: Gautam Mukunda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But the buck stops in the oval office. As it
> becomes more and more
> evident that Bush was asleep at the switch, and
> worse, that he refuses to
> even begin to take responsibility for his lap
William T Goodall wrote:
>
> Cancelled.
Could be. But they are showing an episode tonight...
---David
Any Nielsen households on the list?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Does anyone know if there is any site with exercises in French for
beginners?
Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 07:36 PM 4/8/04, Robert Seeberger wrote:
http://www.voanews.com/article.cfm?objectID=E8445C12-4BDA-4FD9-907DE8377F2F300F
From Science in the News Weekly:
Stone Age Cats May Have Been Household Pets, Grave Site Find Indicates
Dogs are still man's best friend, but new evidence unearthed on C
35 matches
Mail list logo
