From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Dan Minette
So, I'm really curious. How does networking form the basis for a new
paradigm that is so clearly correct, that those who look at things in
the
more traditional way are fundamentalists?
Does the correctness or
On 4/14/06, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think that an improvement in the economic system is possible
without an improvement in human nature, e.g., replacing the emphasis
on greed with one on honesty and helping others?
I'm not sure there is a cause and effect
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew Paul
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 9:06 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: Liberal Capitalist Fundamentalism
Does the correctness or otherwise of any new paradigm have anything to
On 4/14/06, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maru Dubshinki wrote:
...
an apt-get away. But I see you are a KDE man. You
deserve what you get, you and the GNOME partisans both. Perdition on
both your houses!
If you hate both KDE and GNOME, what else do you like?
On 16/04/2006, at 2:57 AM, maru dubshinki wrote:
At the risk of shocking the more tenderminded persons in the audience,
I must confess that my chosen window manager is ratpoison.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratpoison
When I need a program that doesn't quite fit the ratpoison paradigm, I
On 16/04/2006, at 4:48 AM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 16/04/2006, at 2:57 AM, maru dubshinki wrote:
At the risk of shocking the more tenderminded persons in the
audience,
I must confess that my chosen window manager is ratpoison.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratpoison
When I need a program
