Max Battcher wrote:
> On 5/9/07, jon louis mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So what about all of the packages — and people —
>> that (in the words of the commercial)
>> "absolutely, positively, have to be there by 9 AM"?
>> -- Ronn! :)
>>
>> for the present, those people have to be satisfied,
>>
On 5/9/07, jon louis mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what about all of the packages — and people —
> that (in the words of the commercial)
> "absolutely, positively, have to be there by 9 AM"?
> -- Ronn! :)
>
> for the present, those people have to be satisfied,
> but some day, in the not too
On 5/9/07, Alberto Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gwern Branwen wrote:
> >
> > As I recall, wasn't the Hindenburg disaster due to the flammable
> > paint and a known design flaw which allowed the buildup of static
> > electricity? I have little doubt we could do better today.
> >
> Helium
Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
] But now, in this Age of Decay, _every_ hot chick deserves this title
] not for her ephemeral fame, but for something she did 10 or 20 years ago.
] What's happening with the sex symbols?
The baby boomers are getting older.
-- Matt
Helium could be used instead of Hydrogen. If cost is
the problem, then use Methane.
Alberto Monteiro, who can't count.
lots of methane in new zealand - 70m sheep, each
emitting a barrel a day here is another source:
http://www.ciesin.org/TG/AG/ricecult.html
jlm
As Steve said,
"The Brin-L weekly chat has been a list tradition for over six
years. Way back on 27 May, 1998, Marco Maisenhelder first set
up a chatroom for the list, and on the next day, he established
a weekly chat time. We've been through several servers, chat
technologies, and even casts of
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
> At 05:11 PM Tuesday 5/8/2007, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
>> IOW, the dose makes the poison?
>
>
> Water in excess is toxic.
Which just supports my statement. :)
Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/bri
Gwern Branwen wrote:
>
> As I recall, wasn't the Hindenburg disaster due to the flammable
> paint and a known design flaw which allowed the buildup of static
> electricity? I have little doubt we could do better today.
>
Helium could be used instead of Hydrogen. If cost is the problem,
then us
wonderful dream, max, but could you smoke a pipe on
a zeppelin; would hydrogen or helium be used? how
would you avoid another hindenburg?
jlm
As I recall, wasn't the Hindenburg disaster due to the
flammable paint and a known design flaw which allowed
the buildup of static electricity? I have
On 0, jon louis mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled:
> wonderful dream, max, but could you smole a pipe on a
> zeppelin; would they be hydrogen or helium? how would
> you avoid another hindenberg?
> jlm
As I recall, wasn't the Hindenburg disaster due to the flammable paint and a
known design fla
So what about all of the packages and people
that (in the words of the commercial)
"absolutely, positively, have to be there by 9 AM"?
-- Ronn! :)
for the present, those people have to be satisfied,
but some day, in the not too distant furure, it will
no longer be realistic to ship freight
At 10:21 PM Tuesday 5/8/2007, Max Battcher wrote:
>jon louis mann wrote:
Actually, I'm to blame for that . . .
> > Catapults?
>
>Luxury Zeppelins. I think it's high time we had nice luxury zeppelin
>travel. Floating 5-star bars in the sky with ample leg room and good
>views. No airports, no
wonderful dream, max, but could you smole a pipe on a
zeppelin; would they be hydrogen or helium? how would
you avoid another hindenberg?
jlm
Luxury Zeppelins. I think it's high time we had nice
luxury zeppelin
travel. Floating 5-star bars in the sky with ample
leg room and good
views. No
13 matches
Mail list logo