OK, that sounds reasonable. It also sounds like the bulk of the US
foreign
policy with regards to working with Arabs and Persians. Let's look at
a
list of Mid-East oil producers...their 2000 production capacity and our
policy towards them:
Saudi Arabia 9.48 For
Iran 3.77
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Seeberger
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 4:06 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Why so little renewable energy 30 years after the sweater
speach?
- Original Message -
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Robert Seeberger
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 3:57 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Barack Obama
- Original Message -
From: Dan Minettte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs
- Original Message -
From: Dan Minettte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 11:38 PM
Subject: RE: Barack Obama
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Robert
On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:40 PM, Dan Minettte wrote:
OK, I didn't explicitly mention that alternative means are now
available but
at prohibitively high costs explicitlyand I probably should
have. The
cost would be so high that going to sources that are considered
green for
the
On 9/2/2007 1:11:48 PM, Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:40 PM, Dan Minettte wrote:
OK, I
didn't explicitly mention that alternative means are now
available but
at prohibitively high costs explicitlyand I probably should
have. The
cost would be so high
Dave Land wrote:
So, the argument goes, Global Warming due to human activity is either
true or false, and we can choose either to take action to mitigate
those effects or not. Each spot in the resulting truth table has an
expected outcome.
As it has been discussed here many times, there are
On 2 Sep 2007 at 19:48, Robert Seeberger wrote:
I suspect that minimizing pollution from energy generation is a more
immediately achievable goal. Industrial and manufacturing sources
entail a much greater dedication in that it means much greater changes
to our lifestyles.
No, not really.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Land
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 1:12 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Why so little renewable energy 30 years after the sweater
speach?
It is not necessarily a foregone
- Original Message -
From: Dan Minettte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 10:40 PM
Subject: RE: Why so little renewable energy 30 years after the sweater
speach?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Seeberger
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 7:49 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Why so little renewable energy 30 years after the sweater
speach?
I think that the focus on global
And it's absolutely irrelevant what we [me, you, my country, your
country] do while China keeps the pace of one new thermoelectric
coal power plant each week.
The projection that I've seen is that China's CO2 production will be twice
that of the US and the EU combined in 25 or so years. This
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: Why so little renewable energy 30 years after the sweater
speach?
On 2 Sep 2007 at 19:48, Robert Seeberger wrote:
I suspect
Alberto, you better not read this; it will only aggravate you!
On 03/09/2007, at 11:40 AM, Dan Minettte wrote:
I hope you remember my suggestion of a fossil fuel tax that would...as
part
of it...add about $5.00 per gallon of gasoline as an incentive to
conserve
and use other energy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Ludenia
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 11:46 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Why so little renewable energy 30 years after the sweater
speach?
Alberto, you better not read this; it
15 matches
Mail list logo