- Original Message -
From: Maru Dubshinki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: 'Collapse': How the World Ends L3
You have a point about oversimplification: In Guns..., my primary
grief was a lack
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:26:11 -0600, Dan Minette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maru Dubshinki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: 'Collapse': How the World Ends L3
You have
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:26:11 -0600, Dan Minette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll admit I have not read this particular Collapse book yet, although
I've read plenty in the last 30+ years. But, if the review is at all
accurate concerning the claims in the book, then it is based on a selective
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:16:12 -0600, Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reviewer, Easterbrook, is so incredibly wrong in what he says
about _Guns, Germs and Steel that I cannot trust anything he says
about _Collapse. Years ago Easterbrook was a decent science columnist
and reviewer but
- Original Message -
From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: 'Collapse': How the World Ends L3
I'll admit I have not read this particular Collapse book yet,
although
I've read plenty
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:45:51 -0600, Ronn!Blankenship
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:32 PM Tuesday 2/1/2005, Gary Denton wrote:
- I think Brin was on to something in 'Earth' in suggesting the right
to vote be dependent upon subscribing to some opposing viewpoint
media.
I don't recall the
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/30/books/review/30EASTERB.html?oref=log
inoref=login
http://tinyurl.com/47hvq
EIGHT years ago Jared Diamond realized what is, for authors,
increasingly a fantasy -- he published a serious, challenging and
complex book that became a huge commercial success.
You have a point about oversimplification: In Guns..., my primary
grief was a lack of attention paid to how cultural and gov.'t factors
contributed and developed the potential geography bestowed. (Anyone
who has looked into, say, Chinese history will notice that a lot of
the most original stuff