--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:07:35AM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
I've been following the mislabled thread on spelling and dysxia with
some interest. My spelling is horrid,
Apparently your reading comprehension isn't so good either, Dan.
So, my
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 12:46:48AM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
O, and Erik, yes we did turn phrases around a couple of times. The
point of that was to express the need for tolerance, and to express
that everyone is wrong once and a while even about things that the
usualy correct others on. I
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 12:46:48AM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
O, and Erik, yes we did turn phrases around a couple of times. The
point of that was to express the need for tolerance, and to express
that everyone is wrong once and a while even about
I've been following the mislabled thread on spelling and dysxia with some
interest. My spelling is horrid, I've been gigged for it ever since I've
been on the list. However, I've not taken insult for it because I
generally consider the gigging to be good natured. Obviously, Erik is an
exception
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:07:35AM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
I've been following the mislabled thread on spelling and dysxia with
some interest. My spelling is horrid,
Apparently your reading comprehension isn't so good either, Dan.
So, my unsolicited advise to you Jan is that, by Erik
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Bad Spelars
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:07:35AM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
I've been following the mislabled thread on spelling
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:31:08AM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
Let me put forth a hypothesis to you. Differing with you doesn't mean
that people misunderstand.
In that case, you were writing imprecisely. Your meaning would have
been clearer if you wrote unintended insult, since my posts were
At 12:44 PM 8/1/2003 -0400 Erik Reuter wrote:
since my posts were
intended as constructive criticism rather than an insult
In which case, why not provide your constructive criticism OFF-LIST?
If you were at a party, and you gave someone constructive criticism in a
voice loud enough for the
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:18:39PM -0400, John D. Giorgis wrote:
In which case, why not provide your constructive criticism OFF-LIST?
Because I reply to list messages on list.
If you were at a party, and you gave someone constructive criticism
This isn't a party.
party to hear - and not
