Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-11-03 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Ronn Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 7:13 PM Subject: Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test) And does your friend consider himself a professional person? Definately. It was after we were discussing how

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-11-02 Thread Ronn Blankenship
At 09:50 AM 10/31/02, Dan Minette wrote: - Original Message - From: Jean-Louis Couturier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:41 AM Subject: RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test) De : Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [mailto:prutje;softhome.net] Male

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-11-01 Thread Ray Ludenia
Julia Thompson wrote: clarification of Peter Principle available upon request Not necessary in my case. The Principal of my school is called Peter Regards, Ray. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-11-01 Thread Jean-Louis Couturier
Behalf Of Jean-Louis Couturier If ever you work in close contact with marketing, look at some of the people gravitating around the director or VP. De : Nick Arnett [mailto:narnett;mccmedia.com] Hey! I've been both! (Director and VP of marketing, that is.) LOL! And you've never

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-31 Thread Erik Reuter
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:30:10AM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: Erik Reuter wrote: Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-31 Thread Erik Reuter
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:31:22PM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: Erik Reuter wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:30:10AM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: Erik Reuter wrote: Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not dongs (I give you the

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-31 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Jean-Louis Couturier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:41 AM Subject: RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test) De : Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [mailto:prutje;softhome.net] Male whore, interesting idea. I always thought

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-31 Thread Julia Thompson
Nick Arnett wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces;mccmedia.com]On Behalf Of Jean-Louis Couturier ... If ever you work in close contact with marketing, look at some of the people gravitating around the director or VP. Hey! I've been

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-31 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 10/31/02 12:09:24 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If ever you work in close contact with marketing, look at some of the people gravitating around the director or VP. Hey! I've been both! (Director and VP of marketing, that is.) Ding.

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-31 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 09:00 AM 10/31/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote: In older English murder mysteries, it's not necessarily assumed that the gigolo is actually sleeping with his client. (And now can someone help exorcize David Lee Roth's song from my head?) And Neneh Cherry's song too! JDG

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-31 Thread Julia Thompson
John D. Giorgis wrote: At 09:00 AM 10/31/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote: In older English murder mysteries, it's not necessarily assumed that the gigolo is actually sleeping with his client. (And now can someone help exorcize David Lee Roth's song from my head?) And Neneh Cherry's

RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-31 Thread Nick Arnett
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces;mccmedia.com]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... In a message dated 10/31/2002 6:30:55 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ding. Ding. Ding. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Nick Arnett
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces;mccmedia.com]On Behalf Of David Hobby Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 7:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test) ... Sorry, I guess that I missed the post where the dinging

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:14:19AM -0800, Nick Arnett wrote: Ratings a la Slash wouldn't work very well, either, since people read mailing lists via a variety of applications, in which there is no standard way to accommodate ratings. That is not so. Anyone who has capability for simple

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:42:36PM -0500, Erik Reuter wrote: Ah, great idea, better than my subject: line idea! Also, instead of Umm, I should have said, much better than my formulation of the subject: line idea, since I did not think of the idea. -- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:56:42PM -0500, Jean-Louis Couturier wrote: I'd have separate scores for dings received an dings given. If Erik's codes are applied to dings received, we could have a code for dingers along the lines of Tolerant, Capricious and Opinion Police Great idea! I like it.

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Reuter
Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes for people who use them would mean friendly, promiscuous, and real whore. -- Erik Reuter [EMAIL

RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Jean-Louis Couturier
De : Erik Reuter [mailto:ereuter;erikreuter.com] Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes for people who use them would mean friendly,

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Julia Thompson
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote: De : Erik Reuter [mailto:ereuter;erikreuter.com] Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes for people who use

RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Jean-Louis Couturier wrote: Erik Reuter [wrote:] I would suggest at least 3 codes meaning roughly: well-though-of, somewhat annoying, real asshole. Dings could be any real number that people decide (but I still think absolute minimum of 1 ding cost to ding someone else), and

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote: I'd have separate scores for dings received an dings given. If Erik's codes are applied to dings received, we could have a code for dingers along the lines of Tolerant, Capricious and Opinion Police Now *that* would be interesting... ;o) Sonja

Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-30 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Erik Reuter wrote: Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes for people who use them would mean friendly, promiscuous, and real whore. It

Dinging plans (was RE: test)

2002-10-29 Thread Nick Arnett
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces;mccmedia.com]On Behalf Of Jim Sharkey [snip] Do we know if he intended for the dings to be anonymous? Anyone? I know! At first, that was the thought, but that was because DB borrowed the notion from live chat, where