At 11:00 AM 3/30/2009, Bruce Bostwick wrote:
Food security is a fairly significant worry, all things considered.
It's nearly impossible to build up safety margin in the food
distribution systems of most countries on earth because within one or
two generations of any increase in the ability to
Agreed! Reduced fresh water supplies are a great! The Andes glaciers
disappearing in the next 10 yrs will create havoc in India, etc. I
think Dyson is focusing on the models and not the most recent actual
data from the ice.
learner
On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On
At 12:45 PM Sunday 3/29/2009, Chris Frandsen wrote:
Agreed! Reduced fresh water supplies are a great! The Andes glaciers
disappearing in the next 10 yrs will create havoc in India, etc.
Huh?
. . . ronn! :)
___
On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Charlie Bell wrote:
One of Dyson's main points is that global warming tends to get
exaggerated. People of our generation or even the next one are
extremely unlikely to die from the effects of global warming. Even
a few generations down the road it is still
Sorry I meant that fresh water supplies are going to become a great
problem very soon. and of course it is the Himalayas not the Andes
must not have taken my meds:-)
learner
On Mar 29, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 12:45 PM Sunday 3/29/2009, Chris Frandsen wrote:
Agreed!
On 28/03/2009, at 9:26 AM, xponentrob wrote:
One of Dyson's main points is that global warming tends to get
exaggerated. People of our generation or even the next one are
extremely unlikely to die from the effects of global warming. Even a
few generations down the road it is still unlikely
Rob wrote:
Worth a read. Dyson is a Global Warming skeptic with an interesting
take on the subject.
A GW skeptic or an AGW skeptic? It would be hard to deny GW from the
past 400 years with data.
Alberto Monteiro
___
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Rob wrote:
Worth a read. Dyson is a Global Warming skeptic with an interesting
take on the subject.
A GW skeptic or an AGW skeptic? It would be hard to deny GW from the
past 400 years with data.
Alberto Monteiro
Based on what I read in the article, I
It makes no difference in what we need to do no matter what you think
about global warming.
The global models indicate that energy shortage will kill far more
people much sooner than global warming can be a significant factor.
However, if you solve the energy problem on a global scale, fixing
- Original Message -
From: Michael Harney dolp...@mikes3dgallery.com
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Freeman Dyson on climate
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Rob wrote:
Worth a read. Dyson is a Global Warming
OK, I'm finished playing Dyson. Someone else take a turn.G
xponent
Ignored Synergies Maru
rob
No need to play Dyson, he has summed up my take on global warming very
nicely thank you. It is nice to know that someone who ideas have turned up
in some of my favourite books is on the same wave
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/magazine/29Dyson-t.html?pagewanted=1_r=2hp
Worth a read. Dyson is a Global Warming skeptic with an interesting take on
the subject.
Remember brinl brinl if you don't have an account for NYT.
xponent
This Is Not Crichton Maru
rob
12 matches
Mail list logo
