At 04:00 PM 3/17/2004 -0800 Deborah Harrell wrote:
>I am not sure why people seem to have the impression
>that I am not in favor of teen abstinence;
I cannot think of a single post on this List which has stated that impression.
JDG
___
John D. G
> "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >> JDG wrote
> >> Secondly, even the recent study of "virginity
> >> pledges" found that
> >> abstinence-only education was successful in
> >> prolonging the first incident
> >> of intercourse and had fewer sexual partner
- Original Message -
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: Abstinence education Re: Liberal Talkradio Network To
LaunchMarch 31
> At 02:50 PM 3/
At 02:50 PM 3/16/2004 -0800 Deborah Harrell wrote:
>> First, the is no a priori religious connection to
>> abstinence. There are a
>> number of very sound reasons for strongly advising
>> high school students - and younger, to not have sex.
>
>As I have clearly advocated in various posts. But
>t
> "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Deborah Harrell
> > As I have clearly advocated in various posts [teen
abstinence from sex]. But
> > there certainly _is_ a connection to *abstinence
> only*
> > programs -- which are the ones I referred to.
> I don't think there /has/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 02:50 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Abstinence education Re: Liberal Talkradio
> Network To LaunchMarch 31
>
> From: John D. Giorgis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> At 02:09 PM 3/12/2004 -0800 Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >I am likewise incensed that *my* tax dollars go to
> >fund abstinence-only programs (which in MN at least
> >have failed to prevent teen pregnancy - see my post on
> >the ENABL report), and faith-
