Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
Yeah, bwana, an whail we remane poor and unpoluising, we coze
no poblema to the envrinoment.
Just to be clear: you speak (or at least write) English well.
That's natural: English is almost a second language,
professionally it sometimes becomes the first language,
On 28/04/2008, at 1:48 AM, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
Seriously, if we want to save the planet, domestic solar power
should
be banned! People should live and work in the smallest possible
area,
and it means packing families in huge buildings.
Solar
In a message dated 4/27/2008 6:37:07 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The point, however, is that you seldom hear of any rich, white,
American environmentalists offering to stop polluting and green the
planet by composting themselves . . . ;)
. . . ronn! :)
Ronn! wrote:
The point, however, is that you seldom hear of any rich, white,
American environmentalists offering to stop polluting and green the
planet by composting themselves . . . ;)
The message I'm getting is that you think environmentalists are inherently
racist, but that seems to
- Original Message -
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 6:14 AM
Subject: Re: Adressing Global Warming
Ronn! wrote:
The point, however, is that you seldom hear of any rich, white
Wayne wrote:
Seems to me, he is just pointing out the irony in the fact that the Green
Movement is a product of affluence which is a product of technology. And
more specifically that the Green movement is antipathetic to the
technology
that has given them the time and resources to become
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne wrote:
Seems to me, he is just pointing out the irony in the fact that the
Green
Movement is a product of affluence which is a product of technology.
And
more specifically that the Green movement is
John Garcia wrote:
I suspect that people who are caught up in the daily struggle of
survival,
getting shelter, water, some grains to eat aren't placing the same weight
on
environmental issues as we in the affluent countries are.
Shelter, water and food _are_ environmental issues aren't
Original Message:
-
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:29:54 -0800
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Adressing Global Warming
It's true that if the Chinese continue to adopt modern technology without
heeding environmental concerns
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote lots of interesting stuff which raised a
couple of quick questions for me:
1. Why the time limit on nuclear energy? Even if every capable nation
ramped up plant construction enormously (and I hope they do), there is
enough uranium in Australia alone to supply their
Charlie Bell wrote:
Yeah. The point of solar hot water is it's so cheap, and pays for
itself very quickly (3 - 5 years) if it's installed in a new house. So
while it'll never amount to a huge percentage, it's still an
inexpensive way of saving a significant amount of energy. So, like
Great idea! I'm looking forward to meeting your extended family in your new
tenement apartment. Especially the little kids.
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Adressing Global Warming
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:36:53 +
On 28/04/2008, at 12:36 AM, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
Yeah. The point of solar hot water is it's so cheap, and pays for
itself very quickly (3 - 5 years) if it's installed in a new house.
So
while it'll never amount to a huge percentage, it's still an
Charlie Bell wrote:
Seriously, if we want to save the planet, domestic solar power should
be banned! People should live and work in the smallest possible area,
and it means packing families in huge buildings.
Solar hot water, not solar electric. Black pipes in a glass cabinet on
the roof.
At 10:48 AM Sunday 4/27/2008, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
Seriously, if we want to save the planet, domestic solar power should
be banned! People should live and work in the smallest possible area,
and it means packing families in huge buildings.
Solar
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
Which brings us righ back to the dirty little secret of the
environmental movement: that the real underlying problem is that
there are by about an order of magnitude just too darn many people
already, particularly darker-complected ones with no money who don't
speak
At 07:39 PM Sunday 4/27/2008, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
Which brings us righ back to the dirty little secret of the
environmental movement: that the real underlying problem is that
there are by about an order of magnitude just too darn many people
On 27/04/2008, at 9:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As promised, I looked into at what I think is the most expeditious
plan to
handle global warming.
Actually, I was asking if you could look at the weaknesses of the
powersat idea and offer possible solutions - it's often revealing to
18 matches
Mail list logo
