--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To say that these new rules and regulation are to
protect your medical
privacy is bureaucratic double-speak at its worst.
Let me way in from the provider side of this debate.
HIPA is going to make
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure what John has in mind for future benefits, but
one of the
impacts the legislation has had to date is on healthcare
portability. If you move
from one employer to another you can no longer be denied care or have
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me way in from the provider side of this debate. HIPA is
going to make the practice of medicine much more difficult
and more expensive. All of those forms patients are being
required to sign are forced on all of us by the government.
From: The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Speaking as someone who has been immersed in HIPAA for the last 2 years for
my job, this article is HORRIBLE and full of inaccuracies.
Whether you know it or not you now have a medical
identification number.
Er, no. You don't.
I just received a
Horn, John wrote:
There are parts of the HIPAA rule that I don't like, but there are
plenty more that I do like. Both as a member of the healthcare
community and as a patient.
HIPAA legislation is costing a lot of companies a great deal of money, though. Some
of what we do at BCA includes
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Horn, John wrote:
this article is HORRIBLE and full of inaccuracies.
Which is what I have come to expect from most of the articles posted by
Fool. I used to at least skim the articles he posted, but now I usually
delete them without opening them. He
From: Jim Sharkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Horn, John wrote:
There are parts of the HIPAA rule that I don't like, but there are
plenty more that I do like. Both as a member of the healthcare
community and as a patient.
HIPAA legislation is costing a lot of companies a great deal
of
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Horn, John wrote:
this article is HORRIBLE and full of inaccuracies.
Which is what I have come to expect from most of the articles posted by
Fool. I used to at least skim the articles he posted, but now I usually
delete them
Erik Reuter wrote:
Horn, John wrote:
this article is HORRIBLE and full of inaccuracies.
Which is what I have come to expect from most of the articles
posted by Fool.
I was afraid I was the only who'd noticed that. One of his pension articles was so
full of inaccuracies and half truths I
Horn, John wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
HIPAA legislation is costing a lot of companies a great deal
of money, though.
Trust me. Even for a big shop like mine, it's a momentous task.
We are spending a huge amount of money on it. And it's not over
yet! But, hopefully, when all is set and
In a message dated 5/31/2003 4:00:07 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
To say that these new rules and regulation are to protect
your medical
privacy is bureaucratic double-speak at its worst.
Let me way in from the provider side of this debate. HIPA is going to make the
H.I.P.A.A.
Whether you know it or not you now have a medical identification number.
I just received a copy of an in-house memo from an employer concerning
HIPAA Compliance. It states, Attached is a privacy notice that (name of
company) is required to provide to you based upon a new health
Horn, John wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
HIPAA legislation is costing a lot of companies a great deal
of money, though.
Trust me. Even for a big shop like mine, it's a momentous task.
We are spending a huge amount of money on it. And it's not over
yet! But, hopefully, when all is set and
13 matches
Mail list logo
