On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them.
Okay
In a message dated 10/1/2006 8:21:03 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you sure that word is cromulent?
Julia
Crom never lent Conan anything.
Vilyehm
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/30/06, Reggie Bautista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a certain truthiness to that...
That's because I was being probalogical!
Are you sure that word is cromulent?
Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman
On 9/30/06, Reggie Bautista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a certain truthiness to that...
That's because I was being probalogical!
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/br
In a message dated 9/30/2006 9:02:31 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William Taylor wrote:
>
> Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity
>
No. Infinity - (Infinity - 1) = Undefined
"To the infinity and beyond"
Alberto Monteiro
Sorry, I must have been chewing on
the squa
William Taylor wrote:
>
> Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity
>
No. Infinity - (Infinity - 1) = Undefined
"To the infinity and beyond"
Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Nick wrote
> On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
> > took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
>
>
> No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Okay, I did
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 30/09/2006, at 1:43 PM, Julia Thompson wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same siz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity
My brain hurts.
Can I have a cookie?
You can have a cookie. :)
And if I'd done my little project of photographing several kinds of
cookies, I'd send you a .jpg of one
Julia
__
At 10:49 PM Friday 9/29/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity
My brain hurts.
Can I have a cookie?
Visit any number of web sites and you can have a pop-up, too.
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/list
On 30/09/2006, at 1:43 PM, Julia Thompson wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one
that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it
Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity
My brain hurts.
Can I have a cookie?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them.
Well, hey, they are a COUNTABLE
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re:
9/11conspiracies)
Nick Arne
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :)
No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them.
Okay, I didn't count ALL of them. But I counte
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re:
9/11conspiracies)
> Nick Arnett wrote:
>> O
Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't "a little infinite" a contradiction, like "a little bit . . . "?
No... some infinities are smaller than others, as is easily demonstrated.
There are an infinite number of even numbers and an infinite number of
DanM said:
Right, but there are not as many integers as there are real numbers
between
0 and 1. :-)
And there are the same number of those as there are subsets of the
integers.
Rich
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
In a message dated 9/28/2006 8:43:22 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 08:01 PM Thursday 9/28/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:
>On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>Isn't "a little infinite" a contradiction, like "a little bit . . . "?
>
>
>No...
At 09:00 PM Thursday 9/28/2006, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> No... some infinities are smaller than others, as is easily demonstrated.
>
> There are an infinite number of even numbers and an infinite number of odd
> numbers. Those two infinities are the same siz
At 08:01 PM Thursday 9/28/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't "a little infinite" a contradiction, like "a little bit . . . "?
No... some infinities are smaller than others, as is easily demonstrated.
There are an infinite number of even n
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:00 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Infinities large and small
>
> Nick Arnett wrote:
>
Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> No... some infinities are smaller than others, as is easily demonstrated.
>
> There are an infinite number of even numbers and an infinite number of odd
> numbers. Those two infinities are the same size. However, there are an
> infinite number of even AND odd numbers and th
23 matches
Mail list logo
