At 04:31 PM 7/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
--- Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snippage
...my thinking has gone off on a bit of a tangent:
In Texas, (and I have to assume that things are done
in a similar fashion in
the rest of the US) when there is a divorce, a
At 07:42 PM 7/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Russell Chapman wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
Just thought of a scenario not handled by this:
Woman man marry
Woman man have baby
Woman man get divorced
Woman gets custody
Woman marries another man
Woman is killed in an accident when
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 07:42 PM 7/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Is there some age at which children of divorced parents can have a say
in where they live?
Various states in the US have that, and the age varies from state to
state. It's 14 *somewhere*. Don't know anything
At 07:51 PM 7/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 07:42 PM 7/31/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Is there some age at which children of divorced parents can have a say
in where they live?
Various states in the US have that, and the age varies from state to
state.
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
One factor which might (or might should -- who knows what
the courts would do) have some bearing is what the child's
age was when the divorce occurred. If the child was very
young at the time of the divorce, the only Dad s/he may
have ever known is the stepfather.
Steve Sloan II wrote:
It's not *exactly* the same scenario, but I
doubt a step-parent has much more pull than an adoptive parent.
Less - an adoption creates a legal relationship between the parent and
the child, and diminishes (remember when it used to sever?) the legal
relationship between the
Julia Thompson wrote:
BTW, my sister once told me that I'm not terribly good at
being subtle.
I've been working on it since. Do I succeed at times?
Yes. Whenever you have unobservant audience. ;)
Ritu
GSV Ms. Subtlety
___
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brown v. Board was a completely different example, involving
an amendment
that had been passed relatively recently in history, and in the
Supreme
Court overturning its previous interpretation. In the case of
gay marriage,
the USSC has
At 02:56 PM 7/28/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Doug Pensinger wrote:
I know, I know, but we've got a lot of smart people here and I'm
guessing that most of them are aware of Erik's libertarian views, not to
mention his tendency to use sarcasm (especially when dealing with
intolerance), so
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:22:20PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:56 PM 7/28/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
And I'm a horrible person and egg him on when he goes into that sort
of mode. :)
How does that make you a horrible person? Sounds like you and I are
cut from the same cloth
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:56 PM 7/28/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
And I'm a horrible person and egg him on when he goes into that sort of
mode. :)
How does that make you a horrible person? Sounds like you and I are cut
from the same cloth (more warp than weft, one presumes) . .
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:22:20PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:56 PM 7/28/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
And I'm a horrible person and egg him on when he goes into that sort
of mode. :)
How does that make you a horrible person? Sounds like you and I
At 05:13 PM 7/28/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:22:20PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:56 PM 7/28/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
And I'm a horrible person and egg him on when he goes into that sort
of mode. :)
How does that make you a horrible person? Sounds
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:41:27PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 05:13 PM 7/28/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
I think she was joking.
I know I was.
That makes 3 of us (or 2.5, depending on Julia's vagueness)!
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:41:27PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 05:13 PM 7/28/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
I think she was joking.
I know I was.
That makes 3 of us (or 2.5, depending on Julia's vagueness)!
Considering the contents of my belly, go for any
15 matches
Mail list logo
