On 12/10/2007, at 10:57 AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
which could also stand for High Profile
Vehicle, i.e., the ones which are subject to
being blown off the road or over on their sides when it gets
windy . . .
What's the difference? That's happened to me once this year (found
out when
At 09:33 AM Friday 10/12/2007, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 12/10/2007, at 10:57 AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
which could also stand for High Profile
Vehicle, i.e., the ones which are subject to
being blown off the road or over on their sides when it gets
windy . . .
What's the
On 13/10/2007, at 1:36 AM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 09:33 AM Friday 10/12/2007, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 12/10/2007, at 10:57 AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
which could also stand for High Profile
Vehicle, i.e., the ones which are subject to
being blown off the road or over on their sides
At 07:47 PM Friday 10/12/2007, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 13/10/2007, at 1:36 AM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 09:33 AM Friday 10/12/2007, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 12/10/2007, at 10:57 AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
which could also stand for High Profile
Vehicle, i.e., the ones which are
On 13/10/2007, at 11:59 AM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
I was being ironic.
Me, too! Don't stop now!
LOL Fair enough. Bit of a sense of humour failure last night - lost
my pannier with wallet, housekeys, work pass, work blackberry, mobile
phone... fortunately it was handed in to the cops
On 11/10/2007, at 1:45 AM, Horn, John wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote
Sanctimonious? How much of a snarl-up is asking for trouble?
Oooo... There's that nerve again. At least it wasn't *me* this time!
It's going to get very tiresome if every time I disagree with
something strongly, you claim
On 11/10/2007, at 2:28 AM, Dan Minettte wrote:
What you're saying is that the weak should give up their rights to
the strong.
Actually, while asking for trouble is a poor choice of words, I
don't
think that he's advocating that the weak should give up rights to the
strong. I don't
Charlie Bell wrote
Oooo... There's that nerve again. At least it wasn't *me*
this time!
It's going to get very tiresome if every time I disagree with
something strongly, you claim it's a hit nerve...
Looks like I hit ano...urk!!
Oh wait...
Nevermind.
;-) Sorry, couldn't resist.
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Horn, John wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote
Oooo... There's that nerve again. At least it wasn't *me*
this time!
It's going to get very tiresome if every time I disagree with
something strongly, you claim it's a hit nerve...
Looks like I hit ano...urk!!
Oh wait...
On 12/10/2007, at 12:40 AM, Horn, John wrote:
It's going to get very tiresome if every time I disagree with
something strongly, you claim it's a hit nerve...
Looks like I hit ano...urk!!
Oh wait...
Nevermind.
;-) Sorry, couldn't resist.
Funny man...
:-p
Charlie
At 07:33 AM Thursday 10/11/2007, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 11/10/2007, at 2:28 AM, Dan Minettte wrote:
What you're saying is that the weak should give up their rights to
the strong.
Actually, while asking for trouble is a poor choice of words, I
don't
think that he's advocating that
At 09:49 AM Thursday 10/11/2007, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Horn, John wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote
Oooo... There's that nerve again. At least it wasn't *me*
this time!
It's going to get very tiresome if every time I disagree with
something strongly, you claim it's a
On 10/11/2007 9:11:18 PM, Ronn! Blankenship
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ohm, I!
Isn't Williams motto: Ohm My God?
xponent
Resistance Maru
rob
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 10/10/2007, at 7:23 AM, jon louis mann wrote:
i think riders should do as least as much as drivers to accommodate
each other, if for no other reason than they are more vulnerable.
there is a too much hostility and frustration on the road to risk
generating more. those sanctimonious
Charlie Bell wrote
Sanctimonious? How much of a snarl-up is asking for trouble?
Oooo... There's that nerve again. At least it wasn't *me* this time!
- jmh
Woo Foo Maru
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charlie Bell
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:26 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: bikes v. cars
On 10/10/2007, at 7:23 AM, jon louis mann wrote:
i think riders should do as least
Sanctimonious? How much of a snarl-up is asking for trouble?
i agree that the phrase asking for trouble, is a bad choice of words
and can mean anything from provoking an attack to some aggressive, high
dominant, alpha male or even bi-polar driver may run you over, or
he/she is on the phone,
JLM wrote:
What is Woo Foo???
Woo Foo, grasshopper, is the ancient sacred art of the Woo Foo Warriors on the
Disney Jetix show Yin Yang Yo! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yin-Yang-Yo).
It's actually a pretty annoying show but my kids love it.
- jmh
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, jon louis mann wrote:
What is Woo Foo???
jlm
Very good question, and my brain hurts too much to verbalize the answer I
have. :P
(Really need to get to bed!)
Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 09/10/2007, at 3:52 AM, Dan Minettte wrote:
I have a question about your trip around Australia. Did you only
travel on
low traffic roads, or multi-lane roads, or roads with wide
shoulders that
can easily accommodate a bike?
Most roads in Australia are what you'd call low traffic,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charlie Bell
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 4:01 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: bikes v. cars
Most roads in Australia are what you'd call low traffic, and
anyway, there's absolutely
On 09/10/2007, at 11:52 PM, Dan Minettte wrote:
I agree with that statement, I've just been irritated by the
exception who
insist that, since bikes were better for the environment, rude
actions like
snarling traffic are justified. One of the reasons I asked is that
I wanted
to see
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Charlie Bell
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 10:12 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: bikes v. cars
I've noticed that despite the fact that the trike is only 30cm wider
than my bike, cars
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Dan Minettte wrote:
However, if they road in the main lane, they would not have coexisted well.
Instead, there would be very long lines forming behind themat least
scores of cars long, if not hundreds. On the road I was thinking of (FM
1488 from I 45 to US 290 for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Julia Thompson
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 1:08 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: bikes v. cars
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Dan Minettte wrote:
However, if they road in the main lane
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Dan Minettte wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Julia Thompson
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 1:08 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: bikes v. cars
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Dan Minettte wrote
On 05/10/2007, at 8:17 AM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 03:55 PM Thursday 10/4/2007, jon louis mann wrote:
The biggest problem with car driver in car-based cities is
the general ignorance of rules applying to bicycles.
Two abreast is legal just about everywhere, and a bicycle is
*entitled*
On Oct 4, 2007, at 1:40 AM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 04/10/2007, at 11:13 AM, jon louis mann wrote:
pedestrians are not much better. i would think anyone ambulating
by feet or bike would take more care because they are far more
vulnerable. i notice a lot of bicyclists exhibit their share the
On 06/10/2007, at 5:11 AM, Dave Land wrote:
On Oct 4, 2007, at 1:40 AM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 04/10/2007, at 11:13 AM, jon louis mann wrote:
pedestrians are not much better. i would think anyone ambulating
by feet or bike would take more care because they are far more
vulnerable. i
On 04/10/2007, at 11:13 AM, jon louis mann wrote:
i ride a bike and drive so i can see both sides. i am of the
opinion that both groups exhibit extremely hostile and discourteous
behavior, at least in los angeles.
Some do. The biggest problem with car driver in car-based cities is
At 03:55 PM Thursday 10/4/2007, jon louis mann wrote:
The biggest problem with car driver in car-based cities is
the general ignorance of rules applying to bicycles.
Two abreast is legal just about everywhere, and a bicycle is
*entitled* to the *whole lane*. Even in LA. Most cyclists stay
towards
31 matches
Mail list logo
