On 7 Apr 2004, at 4:08 am, Julia Thompson wrote:
Care to take the How grammatically sound are you? test at
quizilla.com?
http://quizilla.com/users/BaalObsidian/quizzes/
How%20grammatically%20sound%20are%20you%3F/
http://tinyurl.com/2e4mn
:)
Julia
Grammar God but you wouldn't necessarily know
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 03:11:36PM -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 02:35:40PM -0500, Kevin Tarr wrote:
I say do nothing until the usual problems surface.
I concur.
I no longer hold that opinion. He should be (and I assume was) removed
from the list. The reason I
Mike Lee (if that is in fact who you really are) wrote:
Ok, we confess. John Doe and Mike Lee are the same person. Well, we're two
personalities of the same person. If you ban us from this list, we will
sue
you under ADA.
If you think it's hard listening to us fight, you ought to have to be
William T Goodall wrote:
On 7 Apr 2004, at 4:08 am, Julia Thompson wrote:
Care to take the How grammatically sound are you? test at
quizilla.com?
http://quizilla.com/users/BaalObsidian/quizzes/
How%20grammatically%20sound%20are%20you%3F/
http://tinyurl.com/2e4mn
:)
Heh. I got Grammar God! :P
Damon.
=
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building:
Heh. I got Grammar God! :P
Me too. Which don't be suprisin me at all, since i done always spoke
English real good.
--
Tom Beck
my LiveJournal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/tomfodw/
I always knew I'd see
Yeah that happened to me too. Bad thing was that I was at work, and while
I'm on the phone with a client I try to access info through the intranet and
get all that crap. I was not amused...
Damon.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 7 Apr 2004, at 7:14 pm, Horn, John wrote:
From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Care to take the How grammatically sound are you? test at
quizilla.com?
http://quizilla.com/users/BaalObsidian/quizzes/How%20grammatically%2
0sound%20are%20you%3F/
http://tinyurl.com/2e4mn
I got Grammer
Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Move along. Nothing to see here.
He's not the one you're looking for-
Ignore that lightsaber under my cloak...
Is that a womp-rat, or are you just happy to see me?
Just Us Jedi Maru ;)
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo!
on time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Arnett
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 5:51 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
Deborah Harrell wrote:
If your supposition
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
I'm so confused . . .
At 03:30 AM 4/6/04, Mike Lee wrote:
Ok, we confess. John Doe and Mike Lee are the same person. Well,
we're two
personalities of the same person. If you ban us from this list, we
will sue
you under ADA.
If you think it's hard listening to us
- Original Message -
From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
Sonja
GCU: Top AND bottom posting is eviler still
A small
Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
Sonja
GCU: Top AND bottom posting is eviler
- Original Message -
From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sonja van
] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
And I'm just LOL over the quantity of response I was able to generate.
If we
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
A I'm so confused . . .
n
d At 03:30 AM 4/6/04, Mike Lee wrote:
t Ok, we confess. John Doe and Mike Lee are the same person. Well,
h we're two
e personalities of the same person. If you ban us from this list, we
will sue
m you under ADA.
o
s If you think it's hard
Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
Sonja
GCU: Top AND bottom posting
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Don't you think that it's an evidence that JD is _not_ that member?
When I play a person, I try to make myself completely different
in the choice of words and style from the real me. For example, I
fooled at least 3 workmates using a female persona.
Hmmm... Maybe I
Kevin Tarr wrote:
I say do nothing until the usual problems surface.
Kevin T. - VRWLC
And they will
I agree with this. Both bits unfortunately. However, I would love to be
proved wrong. I do understand Nick's wariness.
Regards, Ray.
___
At 05:21 AM 4/4/04, Ray Ludenia wrote:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
I say do nothing until the usual problems surface.
Kevin T. - VRWLC
And they will
I agree with this. Both bits unfortunately. However, I would love to be
proved wrong. I do understand Nick's wariness.
I still think it is not really
In a message dated 4/3/2004 10:56:06 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin T. - VRWLC
Duke loses, the free world celebrates
Arizona barely notices. They're too busy training for their game where they
play in wheelchairs.
BASKETBALL
UA men and women to face
Oh, oh. This one I just discovered in my junk folder, where it actually
belongs. It was never intended for the list, but for my drafts folder.
Already wondered what happened to it after I accidentally put something
on the keyboard. It didn't show up on my box for listmail so I assumed
it got
And if I'd read my headers correctly before sending an apology to a
message that I just found out was never sent to the list but that due to
some unexplained coincidental quirk of fate got dumped in my junk
folder, I'd have saved myself some trouble and you the annoyance.
I shouldn't be sitting
To spare you further agony, I'll stop responding to myself now. ;o)
Sonja :o)
GCU: Good night.
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
And if I'd read my headers correctly before sending an apology to a
message that I just found out was never sent to the list but that due
to some unexplained
Deborah Harrell wrote:
If your supposition is correct, I agree; people are
capable of change, and should be allowed to
demonstrate that.
Certainly. Elsewhere.
Subscribing under a pseudonym doesn't demonstrate positive change to me.
In a moderated message, John Doe says he's holding off on
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
To spare you further agony, I'll stop responding to myself now. ;o)
This is psychosis, stage 2 :-))
Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
Deborah Harrell wrote:
If your supposition is correct, I agree; people
Dan Minette wrote:
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deborah Harrell wrote:
If your supposition is correct, I agree; people are
capable of change, and should be allowed to
demonstrate that.
Certainly. Elsewhere.
Subscribing under a pseudonym doesn't demonstrate positive
At 01:50 PM 4/3/2004, you wrote:
I have an administrative issue that I need the list's input on. A new
list member joined recently, using the name John Doe on an msn.com
account. This person's messages are originating in the Netherlands.
As those who have been on the list for a while know,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 02:35:40PM -0500, Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 01:50 PM 4/3/2004, Nick wrote:
What's a list admin to do? For now, John Doe remains on moderation,
which is automatic for new list members.
I should add that Julia is probably not available for a few days.
I say do nothing
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 10:50:11 -0800
I have an administrative issue that I need the list's input on. A new list
member joined
John Doe wrote:
Let's assume for a moment that I am that former list member, and the
same person someone referred to as J. Wouldn't you say it's rather
rude to then talk about me in third person as if I'm not here, and only
refer to me as a former list member or J rather than using my real
Nick Arnett wrote:
I should add that Julia is probably not available for a few days.
Julia is not reliably available until probably the middle of next week.
RL just hit the point of total exhaustion. (I have a breaking point. I
hit it this morning. Things are more under control now, though,
Nick Arnett wrote:
Analyzing the language of John Doe's postings (an area in which I have a
fair bit of expertise), I see a disturbing similarity to that of the
aforementioned banned member.
Don't you think that it's an evidence that JD is _not_ that member?
When I play a person, I try to
At 07:49 PM 4/3/2004, you wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
Analyzing the language of John Doe's postings (an area in which I have a
fair bit of expertise), I see a disturbing similarity to that of the
aforementioned banned member.
Don't you think that it's an evidence that JD is _not_ that member?
36 matches
Mail list logo
