Re: More Sci-Fi Channel sadness....

2003-07-10 Thread Matt Grimaldi
Erik Reuter wrote: On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:07:22PM -0500, Steve Sloan II wrote: I would be very interested to know how much of those ratings came from Stargate (their last surviving serious SF show), how much came from Tremors (mediocre, occasionally cute, but not evil), and how much

Re: More Sci-Fi Channel sadness....

2003-07-09 Thread Jan Coffey
--- Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a good news/bad news kind of thing, good that the sci-fi channel has some great ratings, sad at what it was that gave them the great ratings (I am not including Stargate in that statement) SCI FI's Saturday Original Movies delivered a 1.3

Re: More Sci-Fi Channel sadness....

2003-07-08 Thread Steve Sloan II
Gary Nunn wrote: The channel's SCI FI Fridays block of original programming made it the highest-rated network on all basic cable for the night among males 25-54. The block featured the seventh-season launch of Stargate SG-1 and new first-season episodes of Tremors: The Series and Scare

Re: More Sci-Fi Channel sadness....

2003-07-08 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:07:22PM -0500, Steve Sloan II wrote: I would be very interested to know how much of those ratings came from Stargate (their last surviving serious SF show), how much came from Tremors (mediocre, occasionally cute, but not evil), and how much came from the truly evil