At 06:57 PM 11/3/2002 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
What I am
saying is that it sounds awfully arrogant when an amateur claims to have
the One True Answer (this *is* how etcetera -- notice the emphasis on
the word is) and then add that the professionals haven't figured it out
yet.
He could
At 12:49 PM 11/8/02, John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 06:57 PM 11/3/2002 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
What I am
saying is that it sounds awfully arrogant when an amateur claims to have
the One True Answer (this *is* how etcetera -- notice the emphasis on
the word is) and then add that the professionals
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
Jim wrote:
hehehe, should I ever find myself sudenly diabetic or something,
I'll drop you a line.
Are you willing to take a trans-Atlantic flight though? :)
Hmm, maybe not. But then again, Thanksgiving is a North American
holiday so I'm guessing you're from the
Jim Sharkey [mailto:templar569;excite.com] wrote:
hehehe, should I ever find myself sudenly diabetic or something,
I'll drop you a line.
and later:
In that case,
New Jersey is not all that far from you after all!
It isn't far, but I'll turn around and hassle my own mother in law
rather than
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:41:57PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea
William Taylor wrote:
Judy, Judy,---
Thipht.
Jud---
Swith..THUNK!
Argh.
Do you have any idea how arrow Grant this post tries to sound?
Sorry, William, but you tried *waay* too hard for this one. Gonna have to
ding you for it. ;-)
Jim
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:41:57PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
Do you have any idea howudo
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
make a really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 08:58 , Jim Sharkey a écrit :
No, but my wife does. Every year on the day before Thanksgiving, she
and her father spend the
evening
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
I might have a good recipe. I made a bunch of cookies for fellow
dorm-mates around final exam time one
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
I might have a good recipe. I made a bunch of cookies for fellow
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 12:00 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
make a
really good chocolate chip cookie?
Le Dimanche 3 novembre 2002, à 11:39 , Julia Thompson a écrit :
I
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 10:39:18AM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
given a few recipes by someone whose grandparents had a bakery. If I
still have that paper, I could give you a good recipe.
Tell me if I ought to look.
Yes! Never turn down a good chocolate chip cookie recipe!
--
Erik Reuter
At 07:58 AM 11/3/02, Jim Sharkey wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to
make a really good chocolate chip cookie?
No, but my wife does. Every year on the day before Thanksgiving, she and
her father spend the evening making about a jillion
In a message dated 11/3/2002 7:07:50 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, William, but you tried *waay* too hard for this one. Gonna
have to ding you for it. ;-)
Well I did say tries
I'll go back to trying to win the Eatin' an Arrow contest.
William
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:jxg9;po.cwru.edu]
At 02:07 PM 11/1/2002 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
Would all of these permanent members have a veto? If not,
which ones would?
Virtually every country under consideration for a permanent
UNSC seat in
the future has stated that they would
At 03:47 PM 11/3/2002 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
As Jim said earlier, wouldn't that make it next to impossible to get
anything done on the UNSC? I can't imagine almost any even remotely
controversial proposal not being vetoed by one of that group?
There is a bit of game theory involved.
At 20:09 31-10-2002 -0500, John Giorgis wrote:
So, there you have it. That *is* how UNSC reform will end up - only the
professionals haven't figured it out yet.
Given the absence of smileys, I take it that the above is to be taken
seriously.
Well, in that case: sheesh, you really are
J. van Baardwijk wrote:
Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds? Do you
really believe
that you are so intellectually superior to others that you
can see things
coming that trained professionals with years of relevant
experience would miss?
Puh-lease!
Puh-lease!
A lot
J. van Baardwijk wrote:
At 20:09 31-10-2002 -0500, John Giorgis wrote:
So, there you have it. That *is* how UNSC reform will end up - only the
professionals haven't figured it out yet.
Given the absence of smileys, I take it that the above is to be taken
seriously.
Well, in that
At 01:20 PM 11/2/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
Did you successfully predict which AFC team went over to the NFC? (Just
curious.) Or was your prediction not as detailed as that?
Yup, I made my prediction on the day that Houston was awarded the expansion
franchise. The only error in my
John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 01:20 PM 11/2/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
Did you successfully predict which AFC team went over to the NFC? (Just
curious.) Or was your prediction not as detailed as that?
Yup, I made my prediction on the day that Houston was awarded the expansion
At 10:32 AM 11/2/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
No, this is a kid who just got back from volunteering at a Model UN
conference, who has spent a lot of the past few years thinking about the
UN, and who probably understands about 10 times as much about it as any
of the rest of us here, yourself
At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry
At 09:38 PM 10/31/02, Ritu Ko wrote:
GCU Still Sleepy
GSV Is 9am Too Early To Call It A Day And Go Back To Bed?
Sunrise is Nature's way of telling you it's bedtime.
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:41:57PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
At 04:28 AM 11/2/02, J. van Baardwijk wrote:
Do you have any idea how arrogant your post sounds?
Do you have any idea how arrogant _your_ post sounds?
Do you have any idea howudo you have any idea how to make
John D. Giorgis posited:
A UNSC made up of America, Russia, China, India, the EU, Mexico,
and Egypt as permanent members, and another 18 countries rotating
in and out.
De : Jim Sharkey [mailto:templar569;excite.com]
This is a pretty interesting idea John. It sounds fair and
reasonably
From: Jim Sharkey [mailto:templar569;excite.com]
John D. Giorgis posited:
A UNSC made up of America, Russia, China, India, the EU, Mexico,
and Egypt as permanent members, and another 18 countries rotating
in and out.
This is a pretty interesting idea John. It sounds fair and
John D. Giorgis posited:
A UNSC made up of America, Russia, China, India, the EU, Mexico,
and Egypt as permanent members, and another 18 countries rotating
in and out.
De : Horn, John [mailto:JHorn;healthlink.com]
Would all of these permanent members have a veto? If not, which ones
Horn, John wrote:
From: Jim Sharkey [mailto:templar569;excite.com]
John D. Giorgis posited:
A UNSC made up of America, Russia, China, India, the EU, Mexico,
and Egypt as permanent members, and another 18 countries rotating
in and out.
This is a pretty interesting idea John. It sounds fair
At 03:10 PM 11/1/2002 -0500 Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
Indeed it is, although I think that the Arabs' importance
is a bit overdone. I would rather see a permanent member be
from black Africa which is a sizable portion of the world
population. South Africa is better respected on the
continent
A brief summary of the debate:
Just about everyone agrees that the UN Security Council is no longer
representative. Although many people argue that there should be no veto
in the UNSC, there are five countries that are strongly opposed to that
concept, and they all have veto power over UNSC
John D. Giorgis wrote:
Once this happens, it then becomes possible to envision
expanding the UNSC
to 25 members or so, with 7-8 of them as permanent members
(pending whether
the UK joins the EU seat.)
How long a time frame are you envisioning here?
India is basically a done deal
to
Ritu Ko wrote:
Ritu
GCU Still Sleepy
GSV Is 9am Too Early To Call It A Day And Go Back To Bed?
No, but 10AM is a perfectly acceptable hour to begin a nap. :)
Julia
trying to gauge when to haul someone upstairs, plunk him into pajamas
and start the just-before-bed routine --
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:50 PM
Subject: Aside Re: UN Security Council Reform Re: Just for the record
Ritu Ko wrote:
Ritu
GCU Still Sleepy
GSV Is 9am Too Early To Call It A Day And Go
Julia Thompson wrote:
Ritu
GCU Still Sleepy
GSV Is 9am Too Early To Call It A Day And Go Back To Bed?
No, but 10AM is a perfectly acceptable hour to begin a nap. :)
Okay. I can survive these 35 minutes just by making sure all the
children, dogs and puppies are involved in a *long*,
35 matches
Mail list logo
