for some time - that
uranium can damage DNA as a heavy metal, independently of its
radioactive properties.
Yes, really not a shock.
Sadly missed opportunity for sarcasm.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 22 Apr 2006 at 16:22, The Fool wrote:
osteosarcoma, a bone cancer that strikes about 400 children nationally
each year.
Right. Osteosarcoma is actually one of the more common bone cancers
for children, (the other being Ewing's sarcoma). (Yes, overall
incidence is low).
There was no link
to 1 in 10
million, then it's certainly significant, but adding it to water
could still be overall beneficial.
Stearns' research, published in the journals Mutagenesis and Molecular
Carcinogenesis, confirms what many have suspected for some time - that
uranium can damage DNA as a heavy
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 Apr 2006 at 17:42, The Fool wrote:
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=133828
Young boys who drink fluoridated tap water are at greater risk for
a
rare bone cancer, Harvard researchers reported yesterday.
-Original Message-
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Z_Brin brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:42:58 -0500
Subject: Depleted Uranium, Floridated Water, and Bisphenol Food Wrapping
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C8122-1596301%2C00.html
Food wrap linked
At 07:40 PM Thursday 4/20/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Z_Brin brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:42:58 -0500
Subject: Depleted Uranium, Floridated Water, and Bisphenol Food Wrapping
[snip]
---
http
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: The Fool
---
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=133828
Young boys who drink fluoridated tap water are at greater risk for a
rare bone cancer, Harvard researchers reported yesterday.
The study,
Arizona University biochemist Diane Stearns has
established that when cells are exposed to uranium, the uranium binds
to DNA and the cells acquire mutations, triggering a whole slew of
protein replication errors, some of which can lead to various cancers.
Stearns' research, published in the journals
Addendum - I wrote:
Research is ongoing WRT heritable radiation-induced
genetic damage, in this case cancer surviviors who
were treated with radiation...
and went on to mention miscarriage associated with
exposure to radiation while pregnant; here is a 2002
study that found ...A higher, but not
Huh, this one popped up in my in-box after being
routed through some sort of time-vortex, apparently...
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Going back through the messages.
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But evidence that high levels of radiation cause
cancer and genetic
Going back through the messages.
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:27 PM
Subject: RE: depleted uranium and iraq [L3]
But evidence that high levels of radiation cause
cancer
damage is strong - I will try to
find that post in the archives later, although I may
not have time today. Off the top, however, are
uranium miners with lung and I believe other cancers,
thyroid cancer in people who were treated with
radiation for thyroid nodules and/or acne (which was
stopped
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:13 PM 9/25/03 -0700, Deborah Harrell wrote:
A PubMed search is a little frustrating because
many
of the more recent articles don't have available
abstracts; here are a few, however:
snip
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
But evidence that high levels of radiation cause
cancer and genetic damage is strong - I will try to
find that post in the archives later, although I may
not have time today.
Not the one I meant, but it does list some increased
cancers in
At 11:36 AM 9/26/03 -0700, Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:13 PM 9/25/03 -0700, Deborah Harrell wrote:
A PubMed search is a little frustrating because
many
of the more recent articles don't have available
abstracts; here are a few, however:
snip
years...
Even the Ministry of Defence, which has consistently
refused to accept
there are dangers involved in DU exposure or that it
has played role in
Gulf War illnesses is addressing the problem.
Soldiers returning from
this year's conflict will be routinely tested for
uranium poisoning
At 02:13 PM 9/25/03 -0700, Deborah Harrell wrote:
A PubMed search is a little frustrating because many
of the more recent articles don't have available
abstracts; here are a few, however:
snip
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrievedb=PubMedlist_uids=12500801dopt=Abstract
1,000 and 1,900 times higher than normal were recorded at
four sites around the Iraqi capital where depleted uranium (DU) munitions
have been used across wide areas.
Experts estimate that Britain and the US used 1,100 to 2,200 tons of
armour-piercing shells made of DU during attacks on Iraqi
Bill Clinton called in to wish Bob Dole happy birthday on Larry King and had
some excellent comments on the whole SoU flap...
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/22/lkl.00.html
Here's the relevant part:
-
KING: President, maybe I can get an area where you may
--- Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Clinton called in to wish Bob Dole happy birthday on Larry King and
had
some excellent comments on the whole SoU flap...
As a Republican who doesn't give a flying frel about peoples personal
relationships etc. I certainly do miss that man's
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:58:39PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 06:46 PM 5/28/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:13:52PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
_gallium_, which has a melting point of about 30°C and so will melt in
your
hand.
At 12:21 PM 5/29/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:58:39PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 06:46 PM 5/28/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:13:52PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
_gallium_, which has a melting point of
You're damn right you're not putting anything in my mouth!
Would you say that to your lover, though?
Perhaps more importantly, would she say it to you?
Nothing Not X-Rated Comes To Mind Maru
Heehee.. what about putting words in your mouth?
NFH
-- Ronn! :)
Other researchers suggest new types of radioactive
weapons may have been used in Afghanistan.
I am not a nuclear physicist, but I would think that weapons scientists
would use some other (man-made) radioactive material other than Uranium.
AFAIK, Uranium is only used in DU rounds
At 10:16 AM 5/28/03 -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
Other researchers suggest new types of radioactive
weapons may have been used in Afghanistan.
I am not a nuclear physicist, but I would think that weapons scientists
would use some other (man-made) radioactive material other than Uranium.
AFAIK
At 02:03 PM 5/25/03 -0500, The Fool wrote:
A small sample of Afghan civilians have shown astonishing levels of
uranium in their urine, an independent scientist says.
And in a related story, scientists at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
reported today that recent shipments of uranium arriving
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Naturally-occurring uranium is about 99.3%
U-238 (half-life 4.5
billion years) and 0.7% U-235. Only the U-235 is
fissionable, so the two
isotopes must be separated for use in nuclear power
plants or nuclear
bombs. The left-over non
At 01:10 PM 5/28/03 -0700, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Naturally-occurring uranium is about 99.3%
U-238 (half-life 4.5
billion years) and 0.7% U-235. Only the U-235 is
fissionable, so the two
isotopes must be separated for use in nuclear power
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:13:52PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
_gallium_, which has a melting point of about 30°C and so will melt in your
hand.
What good is THAT? The real money is in elements that melt in your mouth
but NOT in your hand, like mnmium.
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:46 PM 5/28/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:13:52PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
_gallium_, which has a melting point of about 30°C and so will melt in
your
hand.
What good is THAT? The real money is in elements that melt in your mouth
but NOT in your hand, like
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:58:39PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 06:46 PM 5/28/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:13:52PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
_gallium_, which has a melting point of about 30°C and so will melt in
your
hand.
What good is THAT? The real
Chad Cooper wrote:
Other researchers suggest new types of radioactive
weapons may have been used in Afghanistan.
I am not a nuclear physicist, but I would think
that weapons scientists would use some other
(man-made) radioactive material other than
Uranium. AFAIK, Uranium is only
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3050317.stm
Afghans' uranium levels spark alert
By Alex Kirby
A small sample of Afghan civilians have shown
astonishing levels of uranium
in their urine, an independent scientist says.
Critics suspect
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/reuters20030209_214.html
President Mohammad Khatami said on Sunday Iran had mined uranium for nuclear
energy, and insisted its nuclear program was solely for civilian use, the
official news agency IRNA said.
The surprise announcement -- the first time an Iranian
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/95178_du12.shtml
This is just one more article that brings to mind the
Kingston Trio's 'Merry Minuet,' lyrics at:
http://ntl.matrix.com.br/pfilho/html/lyrics/m/merry_minuet.txt
But we can be tranquil and thankful and
This header brings to mind...Superman? The Atomic
Cafe?
What does Tommy the Turtle do when he sees 'the
Flash?'
Duck!...and cover!
Cute Little Jingle Maru
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
At 20:13 28-09-2002 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
(it seems a lot of people on this list have direct experience with
pints)?
Only with pints of Guinness. :-)
Jeroen Give me Guinness or give me death van Baardwijk
__
At 19:21 28-09-2002 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
who's wondering if Jeroen or Sonja will correctly identify the brand of
baby bottle she was using when she was using baby bottles
Avent?
Jeroen I'm hungry! Feed me! van Baardwijk
Julia Thompson wrote:
who's wondering if Jeroen or Sonja will correctly identify the brand of
baby bottle she was using when she was using baby bottles
Avent? Everybody uses those around here, but afaik it's British. And ours have
volume in ml on them, since we use metric. I still use one
The Fool wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=topnewsStoryID=1508708
What volume of uranium would that be, anyway?
Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: 33lb's of uranium
The Fool wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=topnewsStoryID=1508708
What volume of uranium would
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: 33lb's of uranium
The Fool wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=topnewsStoryID=1508708
What volume of uranium would
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 07:08:52PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
Translating into English units, we have a volume just under 50 cc, and a
^^
in^3
sphere radius of about
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 07:08:52PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
Translating into English units, we have a volume just under 50 cc, and a
^^
in^3
44 matches
Mail list logo
