On Jul 26, 2004, at 9:04 AM, Julia Thompson wrote:
I remember Ford/Carter, but I wasn't quite up with what was going on.
My younger sister might have been, though -- who knows? (Those of you
who are parents, imagine yourself in 1974 faced with a 3-year-old
demanding that you explain Watergate!)
On Jul 26, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:01:58AM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
http://slashdot.org/articles/04/07/26/123227.shtml?tid=133tid=199
Yeah, that was pretty good.
It would have been nice, though, if there'd been something in the
message
On 26 Jul 2004, at 6:07 pm, Dave Land wrote:
On Jul 25, 2004, at 10:49 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
We're very much afraid of the way he attacks the principals that have
always been the bedrock of this nation.
But I thought he was The Education President ...
Special Education?
--
William T Goodall
On Jul 26, 2004, at 11:28 AM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 26 Jul 2004, at 6:07 pm, Dave Land wrote:
On Jul 25, 2004, at 10:49 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
We're very much afraid of the way he attacks the principals that
have always been the bedrock of this nation.
But I thought he was The Education
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
I've found that the weakest link in treatment is
always the patient.
I've been a patient on a number of occasions and
have more then once
found that a lot of physicians rellish that feel
of
Going back a while to answer parts of a post, as I've promised.
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
I saw the smiley, but I think you
Since I don't have more accurate figures than anyone
else on % GDP or whatever, I am not trying to reply to
those questions [Erik or Dan might have a better grip
on these]-
Robert J. Chassell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Regardless of the actual figures, as a matter of
effective governance,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:41:12PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
I read Gary far differently than you did. I read him as speaking of
relative priorities. Its not that he disagrees with the idea that, in
principal, paying kidnappers is a bad idea. Its not that he thinks he
has an inherent right
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:42:17 -0700, Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://slashdot.org/articles/04/07/26/123227.shtml?tid=133tid=199
The Slashdotters were pretty vicious with their comments.
Interestingly, I receieved some mod points today. I gave your Brin-L
plug a +1 Informative, Nick.
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:59:51 -0400, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:01:58AM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
Nick Arnett wrote:
http://slashdot.org/articles/04/07/26/123227.shtml?tid=133tid=199
Yeah, that was pretty good.
It would have been nice,
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:41:12PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
I read Gary far differently than you did.
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brin-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 2:04 AM
Subject: Hawking . . .
If you jump into a black hole, your mass energy will be
returned to our universe, but in a mangled form, which contains the
- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: Is this the proper way to run a campaign?
Robert Seeberger wrote:
More than any presidential race I can recall, this one will be won
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brin-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 2:04 AM
Subject: Hawking . . .
If you jump into a black hole, your mass energy will be
returned to our universe, but in a mangled
- Original Message -
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Is this the proper way to run a campaign?
On Jul 26, 2004, at 11:28 AM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 26 Jul 2004, at 6:07 pm, Dave Land
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:20:00 -0500, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brin-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 2:04 AM
Subject: Hawking . . .
If you jump into a
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:32:43 -0500, Dan Minette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at
- Original Message -
From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Hawking . . .
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brin-L [EMAIL
On 27 Jul 2004, at 12:07 am, Robert Seeberger wrote:
[Snip everything for the sake of a tangent]
The question going through my mind is : Are genetic imperatives
rational?
Neither? Impulses or desires that derive from the physical nature of
our bodies are just givens. We have a variety of
Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Snip everything for the sake of a tangent]
The question going through my mind is : Are genetic
imperatives rational?
Not at all. Just look at how insane MAD war is/was,
although in caveman days it made genetic sense to wipe
out a competing tribe
I wrote:
Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The question going through my mind is : Are
genetic imperatives rational?
Not at all.
snip!
Whoops, meant to put in a funny about answering a
rhetorical questionoh, well, I guess you knew that
anyway!
Debbi
Engage Brain *Before*
Dan wrote
major snippage
We could ask Gary what he meant; I certainly don't always
read posts the way the author intends them to be written.
But I'd be happy to bet a beer, a buck, etc. that my
interpretation is closer to his meaning than yours. A literal
interpretation of the
On 27 Jul 2004, at 1:13 am, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Engage Brain *Before* Pressing Send Maru
It would be a very dull list if we all did that!
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
INTEL INSIDE
It's not a marketing
Rob's post about genetic factors influencing the parents
built in desire
to protect their young is more accurate than he knows. I
can't find the
reference at the moment, but there have been multiple studies
that show
that a crying child triggers a hormonal response in many adult brains
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 08:25:04PM -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
Wow! I can't believe that this topic came back to life!
There you go again with the irrationality! :-)
Let me make a few clarifications for those that took the original post
much too literally...
On the other hand, isn't more likely
On 27 Jul 2004, at 1:38 am, Gary Nunn wrote:
Rob's post about genetic factors influencing the parents
built in desire
to protect their young is more accurate than he knows. I
can't find the
reference at the moment, but there have been multiple studies
that show
that a crying child triggers a
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Snip everything for the sake of a tangent]
The
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
Humans, being social animals, created ethics/morality to enhance our
ability to co-operate in
- Original Message -
From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL
In a message dated 7/26/2004 7:08:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But from a genetic point of view I think the answers are very
different. Once you have reproduced, a parents sole (in terms of
genetics) purpose in life is to protect ones offspring. (And/or to
produce
1. Bill Clinton is _still_ the best in the business.
My God, what a genius.
2. Judging by the importance all Democrats appear
attach to serving in the military vs. dodging the
draft, I missed their endorsement of George Bush in
1992 and Bob Dole in 1996. I'm sure it happened, though.
=
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: Terrorism too close to home...
I'm just guessing, but I would think that language, ethics/morality,
and bigger brains developed
At 05:05 PM 26/07/04 -0700, you wrote:
Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Snip everything for the sake of a tangent]
The question going through my mind is : Are genetic
imperatives rational?
Not at all. Just look at how insane MAD war is/was,
although in caveman days it made genetic
Julia Thompson wrote:
I remember Ford/Carter, but I wasn't quite up with what was going on.
My younger sister might have been, though -- who knows?
(Those of you who are parents, imagine yourself in 1974 faced
with a 3-year-old demanding that you explain Watergate!)
*g*
I feel better
At 10:17 PM 26/07/04 -0400, you wrote:
In a message dated 7/26/2004 7:08:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But from a genetic point of view I think the answers are very
different. Once you have reproduced, a parents sole (in terms of
genetics) purpose in life is to protect
36 matches
Mail list logo
