Re: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread Dave Land

On Aug 31, 2006, at 7:50 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:


On 8/31/06, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I thought it had been determined that they are teal . . .


Take your fascist determination and get out of here!  It is a basic
human right for people to believe that the unicorns are whatever color
they like. I mean whatever color the people like, not whatever  
color the

unicorns like.


Pink Unicorns are completely colorblind. Contrary to the idea of
colorblindness that some people have, in which everything is believed
to appear in shades of grey, these particular Unicorns see everything
in shades of pink, (hence their name). When they appear to humans
(which is exceedingly rare), they are reported have a teal hue (hence,
the confusion as to their color) , but that is mostly due to our
limited ability to see in the ultrared and infraviolet bands.

Dave


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: On scientology

2006-09-01 Thread Alberto Monteiro
David Hobby wrote:
 
 How is a cult which ruins peoples lives a joke, a joke which makes 
 its high council VERY rich and a joke which is one of the most 
 dangerous cults in the world.
 
 O.K., if it's purely a money making venture, why all
 the wacky UFO doctrine?  Seriously, with all that money,
 L. Ron could have hired a GOOD writer, who would have
 come up with something guaranteed to work better than
 the Xenu volcano story!  I'm going with joke...

Did you read the previous messages? It's a joke that got
out of control - probably because L.Ron had made so much
money with this joke, that he thought it better to live
with the money and let the next generations figure that out.

Maybe he wrote some criptic message telling that it
was a joke, but we will only know some decades after his
death.

IIRC, someone also mentioned that the Gor masterpiece was
also a joke that got out of control.

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread William T Goodall


On 1 Sep 2006, at 5:47AM, Ritu wrote:



William T Goodall wrote:


In rural India little girls are still sold to temples as sex slaves


In rural India little girls are sold as maids/bonded slaves,


Devadasis are well documented. See here for example

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/ 
2071612.stm



sex slaves
to European paedophiles [a British guy was the latest one to be
convicted]. Obviously, all Europeans are evil and must be eradicated.


There's lots of evil in the world. I'm talking about the part that's  
caused by religion.





and women still throw themselves on their husband's funeral pyres.


Throw *themselves*? For shame! In the three documented cases in the  
last

couple of decades, the Indian authorities have assumed that the fact
that these women struggled and were forced back on the pyres actually
meant that their in-laws compelled them to commit Sati. That is what
these families were prosecuted for.


Jumped or thrown makes no difference to my argument. It's still  
religion that killed them.





That's religion despite the British Empire's attempts to suppress it.


British Empire *never* tried to suppress religion. It was very much an
evangelical Empire, and the incessant attempts to get the heathens to
convert into Christianity were part of what sparked the Mutiny. I  
guess

you are not terribly interested in India History, but you can try
reading Flashman. Fraser's research is excellent, and after reading  
his

books you'd never again make claims like 'British Empire tried to
suppress religion'.


I was referring to the Empire's actions to suppress things like  
Thuggee, Sati and child prostitution that are the symptoms of the  
pernicious obnoxious evil of religion.


As for Indian history - I have read _Midnight's Children_  :-

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/

Theists cannot be trusted as they believe that right and wrong are  
the arbitrary proclamations of invisible demons.



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Ritu wrote:

 I guess you are not terribly interested in India History,

Come on, please! 1 Giga people, millions of ethnicities, 6000
years of recorded history, some other thousand years of
archeological history... It's _impossible_ for anyone to know
India History. The better we can handle is a general idea.
Don't blame WTG for not knowing some facts.

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread Ritu

William T Goodall wrote:

  In rural India little girls are still sold to temples as sex slaves
 
  In rural India little girls are sold as maids/bonded slaves,
 
 Devadasis are well documented. See here for example
 
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/ 
 2071612.stm

Oh, I wasn't denying their existence. One of my favourite movies deal
with the issue, and I am avidly waiting for the English translation of a
Tamil Devdasi's autobiography.

  sex slaves
  to European paedophiles [a British guy was the latest one to be 
  convicted]. Obviously, all Europeans are evil and must be 
 eradicated.
 
 There's lots of evil in the world. I'm talking about the part that's  
 caused by religion.

And I was merely pointing out that the same evil exists even without the
trappings of religion. :)

 
  and women still throw themselves on their husband's funeral pyres.
 
  Throw *themselves*? For shame! In the three documented cases in the
  last
  couple of decades, the Indian authorities have assumed that the fact
  that these women struggled and were forced back on the 
 pyres actually
  meant that their in-laws compelled them to commit Sati. That is what
  these families were prosecuted for.
 
 Jumped or thrown makes no difference to my argument. It's still  
 religion that killed them.

Jumped or thrown makes all the difference to my argument. Jumped would
have supported your thesis and a disturbed mind, thrown means
cold-blooded murder. And the murder wasn't committed by religion but by
their in-laws.

  That's religion despite the British Empire's attempts to 
 suppress it.
 
  British Empire *never* tried to suppress religion. It was 
 very much an 
  evangelical Empire, and the incessant attempts to get the 
 heathens to 
  convert into Christianity were part of what sparked the Mutiny. I
  guess
  you are not terribly interested in India History, but you can try
  reading Flashman. Fraser's research is excellent, and after 
 reading  
  his
  books you'd never again make claims like 'British Empire tried to
  suppress religion'.
 
 I was referring to the Empire's actions to suppress things like  
 Thuggee, Sati and child prostitution that are the symptoms of the  
 pernicious obnoxious evil of religion.

Only a few aspects of one religion, and that too only after a lot of
people of that religion petitioned the Governor-General to pass a law to
that effect. 

Incidentally, Akbar was the one who started the attempts to outlaw child
prostitution, child marriage, sati, and he was the founder of a
religion. Apparently one doesn't have to be an atheist to recognise and
try to stop perversions of the same. 

So if religion is evil because some can and do pervert it, surely it
must also be good when some move to address these perversions?
 
 As for Indian history - I have read _Midnight's Children_  :-

*g*

And I have never been able to finish that book. I find Rushdie quite a
pretentious bore. But I really can't recommend the Flashman series
highly enough. They are laugh-out-loud funny, and Flashy certainly isn't
a pretentious bore. :)

And he mocks religion often enough to keep you happy...

Ritu

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread Ritu

Alberto Monteiro wrote:

  I guess you are not terribly interested in India History,
 
 Come on, please! 1 Giga people, millions of ethnicities, 6000 
 years of recorded history, some other thousand years of 
 archeological history... It's _impossible_ for anyone to know 
 India History. The better we can handle is a general idea. 
 Don't blame WTG for not knowing some facts.

I wasn't blaming him - I was guessing. I have no way of knowing if WTG
is, or isn't, interested in Indian History, and I don't mind it if
people don't know, Indians and foreigners alike. I certainly know only a
bit about bits of it.

If I'd have had any expectations of WTG knowing these details, they
would have been based on the fact that the period he was refering to not
only spanned a mere 190 years, it was also a historical experience his
country shares with mine. But since I already have been told that the
British Raj isn't taught in extensive detail in Britain, I had no such
expectations. 

Ritu

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


history is evil, why it must be eradicated [was: Religious freedom]

2006-09-01 Thread Alberto Monteiro

Ritu wrote:
 
 If I'd have had any expectations of WTG knowing these details, they
 would have been based on the fact that the period he was refering to 
 not only spanned a mere 190 years, it was also a historical 
 experience his country shares with mine. 

But it doesn't mean that it was equally important for both
countries, does it? Also, National History tends to stress
the Glorious aspects of the past, not the heinous. India was
the good guy, England the bad guy, so Indians study that
part of History, Englishmen don't. 

For example, I was surprised that Nederlanders had no idea 
about the _long_ time .nl occupied a huge part of Brazil's 
Northeast. Also, I imagine that Africans study the bleed 
that brazilian import of slaves caused them, and Uruguay 
classes talk a lot about their war of independence
[which here is merely a footnote].

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: history is evil, why it must be eradicated [was: Religious freedom]

2006-09-01 Thread Ritu

Alberto Monteiro wrote:

  If I'd have had any expectations of WTG knowing these details, they 
  would have been based on the fact that the period he was 
 refering to 
  not only spanned a mere 190 years, it was also a historical 
 experience 
  his country shares with mine.
 
 But it doesn't mean that it was equally important for both 
 countries, does it? 

I don't think I ever expected that. :)
I have long accepted the fact of many narratives of one event, and the
differences can usually be traced to perspective. Which also governs the
'importance' bit.

 For example, I was surprised that Nederlanders had no idea 
 about the _long_ time .nl occupied a huge part of Brazil's 
 Northeast. Also, I imagine that Africans study the bleed 
 that brazilian import of slaves caused them, and Uruguay 
 classes talk a lot about their war of independence
 [which here is merely a footnote].

True enough. :)

Ritu

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: history is evil, why it must be eradicated [was: Religious freedom]

2006-09-01 Thread William T Goodall


On 1 Sep 2006, at 3:42PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:



Ritu wrote:


If I'd have had any expectations of WTG knowing these details, they
would have been based on the fact that the period he was refering to
not only spanned a mere 190 years, it was also a historical
experience his country shares with mine.


But it doesn't mean that it was equally important for both
countries, does it? Also, National History tends to stress
the Glorious aspects of the past, not the heinous. India was
the good guy, England the bad guy, so Indians study that
part of History, Englishmen don't.



And us Scots don't study it either from what I can recall of high- 
school history classes. There were some Romans, Bonnie Prince Charlie  
and the Acts of Union of 1707.


--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/

And yes, OSX is marvelous. Its merest bootlace, Windows is not worthy  
to kiss. - David Brin


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread Richard Baker
Ritu said:

 But since I already have been told that the British Raj isn't
 taught in extensive detail in Britain, I had no such expectations. 

Nothing is taught in extensive detail in Britain, alas.

Rich
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread William T Goodall


On 1 Sep 2006, at 5:32PM, Richard Baker wrote:


Ritu said:


But since I already have been told that the British Raj isn't
taught in extensive detail in Britain, I had no such expectations.


Nothing is taught in extensive detail in Britain, alas.



Britain is moving to the American model where everybody 'graduates'  
from high school and basic literacy and numeracy are university level  
subjects.



--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/

It was the pseudo-religious transfiguration of politics that largely  
ensured [Hitler's] success, notably in Protestant areas. - Fritz  
Stern,  professor emeritus of history at Columbia



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 1 Sep 2006 at 13:40, William T Goodall wrote:

 
 On 1 Sep 2006, at 5:47AM, Ritu wrote:
 
 
  William T Goodall wrote:
 
  In rural India little girls are still sold to temples as sex slaves
 
  In rural India little girls are sold as maids/bonded slaves,
 
 Devadasis are well documented. See here for example
 
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/ 
 2071612.stm
 
  sex slaves
  to European paedophiles [a British guy was the latest one to be
  convicted]. Obviously, all Europeans are evil and must be eradicated.
 
 There's lots of evil in the world. I'm talking about the part that's  
 caused by religion.

No, it's caused by people. Religion is the excuse used.

For example, the Israeli-Arab wars...entirely about water and land 
rights. NOT about religions or peoples.


 Theists cannot be trusted as they believe that right and wrong are  
 the arbitrary proclamations of invisible demons.

Aggressive atheists cannot be trusted since they believe right and 
wrong are entirely relative and their ethics are based on no firm 
principles except intolerance and the hatred of the religious.

Andrew Crystall
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: (S)triangulated (Collapse, Chapter 3)

2006-09-01 Thread Deborah Harrell
 Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So what relevance is there here for us?  Pitcairn
 and Henderson remind me 
 of the lonely outposts in outer space we read about
 in science fiction 
 novels.  Is there some resource supplied to us by
 lonely outposts that 
 we could hardly live without?  Would we go to war
 over this resource?  If 
 we were denied cheap access to it would there be
 tremendous political 
 consequences?  Upheaval and civil strife?

I presume you are asking rhetorically, since oil
certainly springs to mind...The interwoven fate of
those 3 islands isn't quite a metaphor for us,
however, since we could (with some difficulty and a
great deal of expense) use more coal for heating,
convert more corn or biomass to ethanol or diesel
equivalent (not cheaply!), etc.  They, OTOH, had no
resources to cross the ocean once cut off from
Mangarea (!sp!), which supplied the big canoes IIRC. 
Still, disruption in our oil supply does create
anxiety, expense and distrust in the government; if
all oil imports were just cut abruptly, it would
seriously discommode our economy, and there might be
severe food shortages - riots.  But I think that we'd
manage to get some oil from somebody else, albeit less
and for a huge price.

I'm going to have to read up about the _Bounty_, since
I never even read the book.

Debbi
who finally got a copy of Collapse from the library,
but having to return it soon, has sped through the
whole thing whoosh!

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Religious freedom

2006-09-01 Thread Dan Minette


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
 Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:52 PM
 To: Killer Bs Discussion
 Subject: Re: Religious freedom
 
 Alberto wrote:
 
  Doug Pensinger wrote:
 
  Anyone reasonable can see that instance of a subset is not the whole.
  JDG is an atheist.
 
  JDG is a devout Catholic.
 
  It was a typo. JDG is so religious, that he is almost a Prophet -
  at least, he is the best listmember to predict the future.
 
 If I could find my posts (late summer-early fall, 2002) on what I thought
 was going to happen in Iraq you might think I was prescient as well.  And
 Dan as well(wherever he is.)

I was working rather hard for a couple of weeks.  Then, last Saturday, my
Dad died at the age of 90...and I just got back from the funeral...and
helping my mom.

Also, it looks as though I won't be able to get questions to Gautam's
friend.  She and he talked about 9-11 conspiracy theories when the poll
indicating that ~35% of Americans thought the US government was somehow
involved with the 9-11 attacks came out. She was quite clear in voicing her
disdain for those who give any credence to this theoryas well as clear
in her questioning of the methodology of this poll.  Anyways, she's not in
the mood to answer any questions from skeptics.

Sorry

Dan M. 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Jobs, not trees! (Collapse, Chapter 2)

2006-09-01 Thread Dan Minette


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
 Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 12:10 AM
 To: Killer Bs Discussion
 Subject: Re: Jobs, not trees! (Collapse, Chapter 2)
 
 On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:51:06 -, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
 
  As for the connection of Katrina to global warming, I think that
  advocates of doing something about global warming do themselves no
  favors by making such arguments.   After all, these arguments connecting
  specific weather incidents to climate change are very vulnerable to
  being counterpointed by the next unseasonable cold snap or snowstorm.
  For example, we're having a very quiet hurricane season so far this year
  - if this trend holds up, will that be any sort of argument that global
  warming is under control?   And if not, then the same must be said for
  Katrina
 
 The effect warming has is on the intensity of the storms, not their
 frequency.  While it can be argued that the recent pattern of intense
 storms is not a result of warming; that it is part of a natural cycle, 

There is an even better explanation.  The advent of world wide satellite
coverage of tropical storms, and hurricanes/typhoons has increased our
ability to categorize these storms as severe.  We do not have a good
worldwide baseline from 30 years ago with which to compare.

Further, there is a good deal of dispute concerning satellite
classifications of these storms.  A good site, run by a Phd meteorologist
who was the meteorologist on board the hurricane hunter that almost went
down in hurricane Hugo, is at:


Here's a relevant quote from his August 11th blog entries:


quote
n China, the death toll has risen to over 100 in the wake of Supertyphoon
Saomai, which slammed into the coast south of Shanghai Thursday as a
Category 4 storm with 135 mph winds. The death toll will no doubt rise
higher today as the remains of Saomai spread heavy rains through the same
region of China hit by Tropical Storm Bilis, which killed more than 600
people last month.

The media is calling Saomai the worst typhoon to hit China in 50 years, but
there is some dispute about just how strong the storm was at landfall. Here
is comparison of intensities from three different agencies at Saomai's
landfall at 12 GMT August 10:

U.S. Joint Typhoon Warning Center: 1-min sustained winds of 135 mph, Cat 4.
Japan Meteorological Agency: 1-min sustained winds of 100 mph, Cat 2.
Hong Kong Observatory: 1-min sustained winds of 115 mph, Cat 3.

So, these three agencies all using the same satellite data couldn't agree on
the strength of this typhoon within two Saffir-Simpson categories! This
underscores the difficulty of trying to determine if global warming is
causing an increase in Category 4 and 5 hurricanes--even today with much
better tools and training, experts still can't agree on storm intensities
with the accuracy needed for such a study.

This was discussed in more detail in a paper published this year by
Kamahori, Yamazaki, Mannoji, and Takahashi of the the Japan Meteorological
Agency (JMA) in the on-line journal Scientific Online Letters on the
Atmosphere - a new journal produced by the Meteorological Society of Japan.
The study compares typhoon intensities in the Northwest Pacific since 1977
as compiled by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) and the JMA. The JTWC
data was used in the famous Webster et. al study from 2005 that found a
worldwide 80% increase in Category 4 and 5 tropical cyclones since 1970. A
key element of their conclusions was the data from the Northwest Pacific,
which make up about 50% of global Category 4 and 5 storms. The JMA group
found that using JTWC's dataset, the number of days when a Category 4 or 5
typhoon was present increased from about 10 per year in 1977-90, to 17 per
year during 1991-2004--a 70% increase. However, the JMA data for the same
time period showed a 40% decrease in Category 4 and 5 typhoon days. The
authors concluded, We do not have sufficient evidence to judge which
dataset is reasonable. I would have to agree--until we get a coordinated
major re-analysis effort of all the tropical cyclone data for the globe, it
is dangerous to make conclusions about whether global warming is causing an
increase in tropical cyclone intensities. I think it is likely there has
been some increase, but it is nowhere nearly as large as the 80% increase
reported by Webster et. al.

Jeff Masters

end quote

Elsewhere he quotes a NOAA model/analysis that indicates that global warming
up to this point should cause about a 1 mph increase in hurricane
force...well within both the uncertainty in measurements and the natural
variation. 



Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: (S)triangulated (Collapse, Chapter 3)

2006-09-01 Thread Doug Pensinger

Deborah wrote:


I presume you are asking rhetorically, since oil
certainly springs to mind...The interwoven fate of
those 3 islands isn't quite a metaphor for us,
however, since we could (with some difficulty and a
great deal of expense) use more coal for heating,
convert more corn or biomass to ethanol or diesel
equivalent (not cheaply!), etc.  They, OTOH, had no
resources to cross the ocean once cut off from
Mangarea (!sp!), which supplied the big canoes IIRC.


No, there are very few perfect analogies and this one isn't even close to 
being perfect, but the point is, as you acknowledge below, drastic changes 
and perhaps even violent reactions would occur if our oil supply was cut 
back drastically.




Still, disruption in our oil supply does create
anxiety, expense and distrust in the government; if
all oil imports were just cut abruptly, it would
seriously discommode our economy, and there might be
severe food shortages - riots.  But I think that we'd
manage to get some oil from somebody else, albeit less
and for a huge price.



Debbi
who finally got a copy of Collapse from the library,
but having to return it soon, has sped through the
whole thing whoosh!


Heh, I'm barely keeping ahead of the discussion and as I'm working the WE 
I'm unlikely to get any farther ahead.


--
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: To the Back of the Bus!

2006-09-01 Thread Warren Ockrassa

On Aug 26, 2006, at 11:54 PM, Dave Land wrote:


Apparently, after screening and re-screening that couple of
milliseconds of Janet Jackson's nipple at the 2004 Superbowl for hours
on end, the geeks at the FCC have lost all sense of proportion.


I know the feeling.

--
Warren Ockrassa
Blog  | http://indigestible.nightwares.com/
Books | http://books.nightwares.com/
Web   | http://www.nightwares.com/

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design

2006-09-01 Thread Warren Ockrassa

On Aug 27, 2006, at 7:41 PM, William T Goodall wrote:

There have been growing signs the Pope is considering aligning his 
church more closely with the theory of intelligent design taught in 
some US states.


So … JPII wasn't infallible after all? What does that actually mean for 
the Papacy? Imagine the chaos that will ensue when millions of 
Catholics realize that the Pope isn't actually the living 
representative of Jesus Christ after all. Millions of crushed believers 
weeping and wailing in the streets … worldwide rioting … icons clasted 
… how dreadful.


--
Warren Ockrassa
Blog  | http://indigestible.nightwares.com/
Books | http://books.nightwares.com/
Web   | http://www.nightwares.com/

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l