Re: DeLong on health insurance reform

2009-09-06 Thread Patrick Sweeney
 What exactly do you propose for everyone in the world who cannot
 afford basic health care such as childbirth assistance and infant care
 and vaccination?

Watch those goalposts shift!

I'll play. You say taxes are theft of freedom. There are people who
are taxed more than those of us in the United States. Therefore, you
believe they have lost even more freedom than we have. What exactly do
you propose for everyone in the world who pays higher taxes? What are
you, personally, doing to increase their freedom?

Until you have freed everyone else in the world from taxes, you don't
get to talk about the US any more. Sorry. Just applying your own rules
to you. It's only fair.

Patrick

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: DeLong on health insurance reform

2009-09-06 Thread Patrick Sweeney
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:29 PM, David Hobby hob...@newpaltz.edu wrote:
 John Williams wrote:

 On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 2:50 PM, David Hobbyhob...@newpaltz.edu wrote:

 ...

 Yes, I AM prepared to make you pay your share
 to keep people from dying

 Really? Would you literally come to my house with a gun and force me
 to give you money, telling me that you know better who it should be
 spent on than I do?

 John--

 No, that's what governments are for.  I agree with
 you, they do tax by force.  So?


Someone else asked this in an earlier conversation, but does anyone
else on the list ever have the government come to their house with a
gun and force them to file their taxes? It's never happened to me. How
much in back taxes do you have to owe before the government sends the
IRS SWAT team to your house, I wonder?

Patrick

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Passive-Agressive posting (was Re: The Role of Government in a Libertarian Free Market)

2009-08-18 Thread Patrick Sweeney
It's a put-on. And it's a put-on anyone who's been on the Internet for
more than 5 minutes has seen dozens of times. The repetitive I'm just
asking questions to try to understand, the feigned cluelessness, the
detached pose, the deliberate obtuseness ... it's all carefully
calculated to do one thing and one thing only - get the other person
to blow his top so you can disregard them as being irrational or
rude.

It's kind of like playing with that old Eliza computer program. Anyone
remember that?

Patrick


On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jim Sharkeytemplar...@excite.com wrote:
 Doug wrote:

Now see, I guess I dont understand what passive-aggressive means because I
 would think that his confrontational, sometimes sarcastic style has any
 passivity to it.

 I see it differently, perhaps. Passive-agressive may not be the right
 clinical term here, but I find repeated statements such as Im just asking
 questions and intimations of it being the other persons' faults for how
 they interpret what you're writing as a way to irritate someone and present
 a point of view without *really* presenting it. It may not be a textbook
 definition, but that's how it strikes me.

 I'm not saying JW does this regularly, it's just something I get exposed to
 on a lot of lists and it pushes my buttons, so it's certainly possible the
 fault lies within me. Erik used to do it to people here all the time (JVB
 was *especially* prone to rising to that particular bait(, and that was one
 of the reasons I could barely stand to read even his quality posts.

 Jim
 Confessionals Maru
 
   Click for a wide selection of quality scales.
 Scale
 Click Here For More Information

 ___
 http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com






-- 
___
Patrick Sweeney
Firefly Games | www.firefly-games.com

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: A Real Free Market in Health Care

2009-08-16 Thread Patrick Sweeney
When you reach a point where the suggested solution to ridiculously
overpriced health insurance is to take out an insurance policy on your
insurance ... perhaps it's a sign that you ought to consider some
other system.

Patrick

On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:24 PM, John Williamsjwilliams4...@gmail.com wrote:
 One thing that is often discussed in reference to health insurance is
 that if someone is unexpectedly afflicted with a chronic condition,
 their health insurance premiums will usually increase drastically.
 Health insurance for someone diagnosed with a chronic condition might
 go from $2,000 a year to $10,000. Many people would be unable to pay
 the higher amount, and cite this as a reason for making health
 insurance non-voluntary with a very large risk pool.

 However, having health insurance premiums unexpectedly increase is the
 sort of personal risk that can itself be insured against. Sometimes
 called health status insurance, such insurance pays out a lump sum
 or as an annuity if an event occurs that drastically raises health
 insurance costs.

 Here is an article discussing health status insurance:

 http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9986

 ___
 http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: A Real Free Market in Health Care

2009-08-16 Thread Patrick Sweeney
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, David Hobbyhob...@newpaltz.edu wrote:

 I'd guess that Patrick is expecting health insurance
 to have health status insurance already built into it.

One would think the whole point of health insurance is to provide you
with health care (more precisely, the funds to acquire such) should
you fall ill.

Both of us are playing the odds. I'm betting that I'll need some
expensive procedure I can't afford on my own someday; the insurer bets
I don't.

But if I do fall ill, for the insurer to raise my rates rather than
provide the agreed-upon care seems like dirty pool. And to suggest
that I ought to insure my insurance policy (and perhaps to be certain,
I ought to insure the insurance on my insurance?) seems like a sign of
massively broken system. For anyone but the insurers, at least.

Patrick

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Senate Hearing on Wiretapping

2006-02-06 Thread Patrick Sweeney
Hi folks,
Or how about this exchange:

..
BIDEN: Thank you very much. General, how has this revelation damaged
the program?

I'm almost confused by it but, I mean, it seems to presuppose that
these very sophisticated Al Qaida folks didn't think we were
intercepting their phone calls.

I mean, I'm a little confused. How did it damage this?

GONZALES: Well, Senator, I would first refer to the experts in the
Intel Committee who are making that statement, first of all. I'm just
the lawyer.

And so, when the director of the CIA says this should really damage
our intel capabilities, I would defer to that statement. I think,
based on my experience, it is true -- you would assume that the enemy
is presuming that we are engaged in some kind of surveillance.

But if they're not reminded about it all the time in the newspapers
and in stories, they sometimes forget.

(LAUGHTER)
...

They sometimes forget? Is this al Qaida or the Keystone Kops? For that
matter, if al Qaida's this naive  inept, why even bother with a War
on Terror? Just, you know, plant a pie truck near their base or
scatter banana peels around. Problem solved.
___
Patrick Sweeney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


The Radioactive Boy Scout

2006-02-04 Thread Patrick Sweeney
Hi folks,
I'm currently re-reading The Radioactive Boy Scout by Ken
Silverstein. It's the true story of a teenager near Detroit who tried
to build a breeder reactor in his back yard shed in the 1990s - the
EPA eventually had to clean it up. It's an interesting read, though
the author has a strong anti-nuclear stance. Anyone else read it?

I originally read it along with Bobby Fischer Goes to War for an
obsessed prodigy two-fer. :)

Patrick Sweeney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Radioactive Boy Scout

2006-02-04 Thread Patrick Sweeney
I enjoyed Bobby Fischer Goes to War. It focuses on the 1972 match
with Boris Spassky in Iceland, of course, but also covers the careers
 psychologies of the two chess masters, U.S.-Soviet relations, and a
lot more. It skips analyzing the arcana of the chess matches except to
explain a revealing blunder or pivotal moment, so it's accessible even
to people with only a passing interest in chess. A great read.

Here's the Amazon link:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060510242/102-8102077-3649715?v=glancen=283155

Patrick Sweeney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Human-Animal Hybrid Ban

2006-02-04 Thread Patrick Sweeney
Hi folks,
Does this mean a big-screen version of Manimal is out?

Patrick Sweeney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l