On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:57:53 -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
We've now gotten to the point where we are discussing strongly conflicting
data from different sources. Rereading my post, I was worried that it
might appear that I will simply not accept any number you put out. But, I
am applying self
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:32:47 -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
I think remote, not rural is where the break even is. From
http://www.go-solar.com/Pvinsolation.html
I got the average sun hours as 4.8/day. If you factor in the fact that the
cells rarely operate at peak efficiency, you are talking close to
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:01:58 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
I've been enjoying reading this thread. I have a comment or three, and
a question (and the question is something I could probably look up, but
I figure someone knows the answer)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:42:23
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 15:40:50 -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
Please forgive the lateness of my reply. Life gets in the way.
..much snippage throughout...
Feel free to check my figures, but it appears that the energy storage is
consistant with about 12% efficiency. Which kinda makes sense, because
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:13:37 -0400 (EDT), Jim Sharkey wrote:
I dunno, Dean. I *really* liked both FoG and AoS, but I can't see either one
becoming a movie the general populace would like, if they stay even
remotely
close to the events in the books. There's an awful lot of downbeat parts to
