Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-06 Thread Gary Denton
On 7/3/05, Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That the best actor in the movie would be about 9?

War of the Worlds

Correction - worthy of a best supporting actress nomination Dakota
Fanning is 11.
--
Gary Denton
http://www.apollocon.org  June 23-25, 2006

Easter Lemming Blogs
http://elemming.blogspot.com
http://elemming2.blogspot.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-03 Thread Gary Denton
SPoilers  -

.
.
.
.
.

Now that I have seen the movie I looked at this thread.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

..
.
.
.
.


While there was speculation that the machines were buried hundreds or
even millions of years ago it is uninformed speculation in the
movie.

For a number of reasons I doubt this.

After the movie a group of us was thinking that the machines were
likely built by nanomachines and that could have been as recently as a
few hours.

The book version had the Martians fired from large cannon on Mars. 
The Pal movie version I believe had rockets from Mars.  In that movie
version the shapes of the machines was just a much larger form of the
eye apparatus at the end of the metal tentacle that searches the
house.  There were several homages in the film. I always thought that
the Pal alien war machines were powered by anti-gravity and were not
tripods but someone else in the group said the lights under the craft
gave the impression of three legs.

Who knew  ---

That a large EMP would knock out all electrical equipment except for
video cameras?

That lightning type discharges could be used as transporter devices?

That creatures far in advance of us that can launch a massive
worldwide invasion utterly defeating our military and are evidently
using human and mammalian blood for unknown evil purposes and can even
start establishing an alien ecosystem in a matter of days would give
no thought to Earth microorganisms?

That the best actor in the movie would be about 9?

I dislike Tom Cruise but his character was not likeable particularly
in the beginning of the movie so that was OK.


On 7/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Spoilers...you get the idea...
 --

Gary Denton
http://www.apollocon.org  June 24-26

Easter Lemming Blogs
http://elemming.blogspot.com
http://elemming2.blogspot.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-03 Thread Max Battcher

William T Goodall wrote:


On 1 Jul 2005, at 12:01 pm, Max Battcher wrote:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In  a  message dated  6/30/2005 9:31:19 P.M.  US Mountain  Standard 
Time,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3jane.net)   
writes:


Ok,  I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first  time 
instead

of burying ships and leaving?


That, I could not tell you.   :)
Julia



Because...  I believe it is in the book.  Its been awhile since  I've 
read it, but I think the same concerns existed about the book.



It's been a while since I read it too (although more recently than  its 
1898 publication!) and as I recall the Martians arrive for the  first 
time, all at once, in huge artillery shell type things and  proceed to 
invade straight away.


And then all die from catching a sniffle.



Yep, I have such a poor memory.  It's funny, but I did a failed 
project involving War of the Worlds, so you would think it would be 
one of the stickier works in my mind.


--
--Max Battcher--
http://www.worldmaker.net/
Support Open/Free Mythoi: Read the manifesto @ mythoi.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-02 Thread ValdivielsoB
Spoilers...you get the idea...


In a message dated 7/1/05 12:15:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  The virus or bacteria mutated between the time the ships were 
  buried and now?  That seems very plausible to me, anyway.
   Julia
 
 
 Ok, I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time instead
 of burying ships and leaving?
  


Union rules?   :-)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-01 Thread Medievalbk
 
In 
 
a 
 
message 
dated 
 
6/30/2005 9:31:19 P.M. 
 
US 
Mountain 
Standard 
Time, 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])  
 
writes:

 Ok,  I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time instead
  of burying ships and leaving?

That, I could not tell you.   :)

Julia




Bury ships first. Throw rocks at dinosaurs  second?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-01 Thread Max Battcher

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
In 
 
a 
 
message 
dated 
 
6/30/2005 9:31:19 P.M. 
 
US 
Mountain 
Standard 
Time, 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])  
 
writes:




Ok,  I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time instead
of burying ships and leaving?



That, I could not tell you.   :)

Julia



Because...  I believe it is in the book.  Its been awhile since I've 
read it, but I think the same concerns existed about the book.


--
--Max Battcher--
http://www.worldmaker.net/
Support Open/Free Mythoi: Read the manifesto @ mythoi.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-01 Thread William T Goodall


On 1 Jul 2005, at 12:01 pm, Max Battcher wrote:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In  a  message dated  6/30/2005 9:31:19 P.M.  US Mountain  
Standard Time,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
3jane.net)   writes:


Ok,  I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first  
time instead

of burying ships and leaving?


That, I could not tell you.   :)
Julia



Because...  I believe it is in the book.  Its been awhile since  
I've read it, but I think the same concerns existed about the book.


It's been a while since I read it too (although more recently than  
its 1898 publication!) and as I recall the Martians arrive for the  
first time, all at once, in huge artillery shell type things and  
proceed to invade straight away.


And then all die from catching a sniffle.

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/

Those who study history are doomed to repeat it.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-01 Thread Damon Agretto



Ok, I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time instead
of burying ships and leaving?


Maybe they were prepositioning equipment in the same way the US has 
prepositioned equipment in places like Diego Garcia. It's all about the 
contingency plans; we don't know what sort of operations are going on in 
other theaters, etc. or the political, economic, or environmental situation 
on Mars (though we could make some good guesses...)...


Damon.


Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: Esci's BMP-1




--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.1/28 - Release Date: 6/24/2005

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-01 Thread Warren Ockrassa

On Jul 1, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Damon Agretto wrote:



Ok, I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time 
instead

of burying ships and leaving?


Maybe they were prepositioning equipment in the same way the US has 
prepositioned equipment in places like Diego Garcia. It's all about 
the contingency plans; we don't know what sort of operations are 
going on in other theaters, etc. or the political, economic, or 
environmental situation on Mars (though we could make some good 
guesses...)...


Sleeper cells?

Put the equipment in place against the day when they *might* need it, 
and then activate it when it's necessary...?


As for bacteria -- a new virulent mutation that they *didnt* have a 
problem with then might well have emerged over the centuries.


As to why no one found them ... that's a puzzler.

BTW, the Wells version had Martians launching their capsules like 
artillery, yes -- IIRC flashes were seen on Mars some time (weeks? 
months?) before the first arrivals started hitting Earth.



--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress The Seven-Year Mirror
http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-07-01 Thread Dave Land


On Jul 1, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:


On Jul 1, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Damon Agretto wrote:




Ok, I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time
instead of burying ships and leaving?


Maybe they were prepositioning equipment in the same way the US has
prepositioned equipment in places like Diego Garcia. It's all about 
the
contingency plans; we don't know what sort of operations are going 
on

in other theaters, etc. or the political, economic, or environmental
situation on Mars (though we could make some good guesses...)...


Sleeper cells?


OFFTOPIC
This reminded me of a fake news item I saw the other day: a leak of a
Bush administration memo approving the torture of enemy combatant
fetuses because they might contain terrorist cells.
/OFFTOPIC


Put the equipment in place against the day when they *might* need it,
and then activate it when it's necessary...?

As for bacteria -- a new virulent mutation that they *didnt* have a
problem with then might well have emerged over the centuries.


Perhaps our failure to complete our full rounds of antibiotics ends up
saving our lives, providing an ironic twist to what Wells intended as
an ironic twist.


As to why no one found them ... that's a puzzler.

BTW, the Wells version had Martians launching their capsules like
artillery, yes -- IIRC flashes were seen on Mars some time (weeks?
months?) before the first arrivals started hitting Earth.


Yes:

During the opposition of 1894 a great light was seen on the
illuminated part of the disk, first at the Lick Observatory,
then by Perrotin of Nice, and then by other observers. English
readers heard of it first in the issue of Nature dated August 2.
I am inclined to think that this blaze may have been the casting
of the huge gun, in the vast pit sunk into their planet, from
which their shots were fired at us. Peculiar markings, as yet
unexplained, were seen near the site of that outbreak during the
next two oppositions.

(BTW: Lick Observatory is about 20 driving miles from here, probably
more like 10 miles as the crow flies.)

 The storm burst upon us six years ago now. As Mars approached
opposition, Lavelle of Java set the wires of the astronomical
exchange palpitating with the amazing intelligence of a huge
outbreak of incandescent gas upon the planet. It had occurred
towards midnight of the twelfth; and the spectroscope, to which
he had at once resorted, indicated a mass of flaming gas,
chiefly hydrogen, moving with an enormous velocity towards this
earth. This jet of fire had become invisible about a quarter
past twelve. He compared it to a colossal puff of flame suddenly
and violently squirted out of the planet, as flaming gases
rushed out of a gun.

(Source: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/warworlds/warw.html)

Does anyone remember the 1976 album Jeff Wayne's Musical Version of The
War of the Worlds? I spent more than a few of my lonely teenage hours
wearing that damned thing out. To the best of my recollection, they
hewed rather close to the Wells (and not the Welles) version. It's
available on Amazon, of course, with samples! (I'd forgotton how
disco-influenced the opening piece, Eve of War was.)

Here's how Wayne's version put it (huge swaths of the album were
narrated and acted, with songs between):

At midnight, on the 12th of August, a huge mass of luminous gas
erupted from Mars and sped towards Earth. Across two hundred
million miles of void, invisibly hurtling towards us, came the
first of the missiles that were to bring so much calamity to
Earth. As I watched, there was another jet of gas. It was
another missile, starting on its way.

And that's how it was for the next ten nights. A flare, spurting
out from Mars. Bright green, drawing a green mist behind it; a
beautiful, but somehow disturbing sight. Ogilby, the astronomer,
assured me we were in no danger. He was convinced there could be
no living thing on that remote, forbidding planet.

Dave

Ulla! Maru

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Gary Nunn
WARNING !!!
 
MAJOR spoilers below
 
S
 
P
 
O
 
I
 
L
 
E
 
R
  
S
 
P
 
A
 
C
 
E
 
 
I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a few
major plot holes and inconsistencies.
 
I don't usually pick apart plot holes, but these are bugging me
 
1. If the tripods were all buried hundreds of years ago, why didn't someone
accidentally find at least one?
 
2. If the aliens were here hundreds of years ago, why didn't they take over
the planet then, when there would have been no resistance?
 
3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) the
first time they were here to bury the ships?
 
 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Julia Thompson


On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Gary Nunn wrote:

 WARNING !!!
  
 MAJOR spoilers below
  
 S
  
 P
  
 O
  
 I
  
 L
  
 E
  
 R
   
 S
  
 P
  
 A
  
 C
  
 E
  
  
 I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a few
 major plot holes and inconsistencies.
  
 I don't usually pick apart plot holes, but these are bugging me
  
  
 3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) the
 first time they were here to bury the ships?

The virus or bacteria mutated between the time the ships were buried and 
now?  That seems very plausible to me, anyway.

Julia

whose last trip to the theater was to see The Incredibles at full price 
(and worth every penny, too!)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Gary Nunn
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julia Thompson
 Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:08 AM
 To: Killer Bs Discussion
 Subject: Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS
 
 
 
 On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Gary Nunn wrote:
 
  WARNING !!!
   
  MAJOR spoilers below
   
  S
   
  P
   
  O
   
  I
   
  L
   
  E
   
  R

  S
   
  P
   
  A
   
  C
   
  E
   
   
  I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a 
  few major plot holes and inconsistencies.
   
  I don't usually pick apart plot holes, but these are bugging me
   
   
  3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) 
  the first time they were here to bury the ships?
 
 The virus or bacteria mutated between the time the ships were 
 buried and now?  That seems very plausible to me, anyway.
   Julia


Ok, I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time instead
of burying ships and leaving?

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Julia Thompson


On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Gary Nunn wrote:

  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julia Thompson
  Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:08 AM
  To: Killer Bs Discussion
  Subject: Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS
  
  
  
  On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Gary Nunn wrote:
  
   WARNING !!!

   MAJOR spoilers below

   S

   P

   O

   I

   L

   E

   R
 
   S

   P

   A

   C

   E


   I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a 
   few major plot holes and inconsistencies.

   I don't usually pick apart plot holes, but these are bugging me


   3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) 
   the first time they were here to bury the ships?
  
  The virus or bacteria mutated between the time the ships were 
  buried and now?  That seems very plausible to me, anyway.
  Julia
 
 
 Ok, I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time instead
 of burying ships and leaving?

That, I could not tell you.  :)

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Russell Chapman

Gary Nunn wrote:


WARNING !!!

MAJOR spoilers below

S

P

O

I

L

E

R
 
S


P

A

C

E


I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a few
major plot holes and inconsistencies.

2. If the aliens were here hundreds of years ago, why didn't they take over
the planet then, when there would have been no resistance?

3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) the
first time they were here to bury the ships?
 

Not having seen it, maybe I shouldn't comment, but couldn't the ones 
burying the ships have died from bacteria?
Could the advance party have been an invasion force first wave that came 
to set the equipment in place, but when they succumbed to the bacteria, 
the military chiefs on Mars were waiting for a signal which never came, 
and so it took all this time to mount a new attack?


Cheers
Russell C.




---
This email (including any attachments) is confidential
and copyright. The School makes no warranty about the
content of this email. Unless expressly stated, this
email does not bind the School and does not necessarily
constitute the opinion of the School.

If you have received this email in error, please delete
it and notify the sender.
---
GWAVAsig
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l