I got this from another list... Maybe that's why Clinton was better than
Bush II...
Alberto Monteiro
http://peety-passion.com/relax/2007/11/27/stoned-drivers-are-safe-drivers/
Stoned drivers are safe drivers
November 27th, 2007 | $B*(B
marijuana
Two decades of research show that marijuana
At 04:21 AM Wednesday 11/28/2007, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
I got this from another list... Maybe that's why Clinton was better than
Bush II...
Alberto Monteiro
http://peety-passion.com/relax/2007/11/27/stoned-drivers-are-safe-drivers/
Stoned drivers are safe drivers
November 27th, 2007 | $B*(B
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Dave Land wrote:
This brings to mind the long-standing question, what is the big deal
about marijuana, anyway? America, anyway, has had this stupid Reefer
Madness mentality for far too long, especially given that a far, far
more dangerous drug is available in
On Nov 28, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 04:21 AM Wednesday 11/28/2007, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Maybe that's why Clinton was better than Bush II...
A better driver? I don't have any data on that.
My own personal feelings on the matter of notwithstanding, I think the
jury is
I got this from another list... Maybe that's why Clinton was better than
Bush II...
Alberto Monteiro
http://peety-passion.com/relax/2007/11/27/stoned-drivers-are-safe-drivers/
speaking for myself, i would not risk driving stone-ed, especially with the
high quality hydroponic, genetically
Dave Land wrote:
Not to say that I would replace my consumption of drink responsibly
quantities of that dangerous drug with marijuana, because I don't
want to fsck up my lungs. My mother and brother were both killed by lung
cancer, so I suspect I should keep mine clean for as long as I
On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Dave Land wrote:
Not to say that I would replace my consumption of drink responsibly
quantities of that dangerous drug with marijuana, because I don't
want to fsck up my lungs. My mother and brother were both killed
by lung
cancer, so
At 12:49 PM Wednesday 11/28/2007, Dave Land wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 04:21 AM Wednesday 11/28/2007, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
It found that drivers with only cannabis in their systems
were slightly less likely to cause accidents than those without.
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
http://peety-passion.com/relax/2007/11/27/stoned-drivers-are-safe-drivers/
Stoned drivers are safe drivers
Two decades of research show that marijuana use may actually reduce
driver accidents.
I can't be the only one who thought this was going to be a Bill Hicks routine,
On 11/28/2007 4:55:58 PM, Jim Sharkey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
http://peety-passion.com/relax/2007/11/27/stoned-drivers-are-safe-
drivers/
Stoned drivers are safe drivers
Two decades of research show that marijuana use may actually reduce
driver accidents.
I
Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but the basic statistics on second hand
smoke have been supported by real testing.
snip
I think it is a mistake to look for single causes
when the potential
for synergistic effects should be evident.
Yes
--- Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julia wrote:
Uh, yeah. How hard can it be to pee on the
correct part of the thing, anyway? :)
Depends on how far awy you stand. 8^)
Doug
ROU Target Practice
lol
Well, apparently in some trials with actual patients,
as many as 20+%
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3996062/
Martha S. Jones has asthma, so whenever her husband,
Bob, lights up at their Woodbridge home, the agreement
is that he steps outside.
She used to think that protected her from exposure to
the more than 4,000 chemical compounds found in
cigarette smoke, 43
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: brinl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Scouted: Home test kit for second-hand smoke exposure
[Snip bad science for commercial purposes]
And Martha then vacuums her new carpet, uses
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Home test kit for second-hand smoke exposure
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: Scouted: Home test kit for second-hand smoke exposure
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Just what is in that underarm deodorant anyway?
Mine? Mostly a petroleum-based gel, as well as coriander oil, lichen
and aloe. (I'd have to go upstairs and grab a stick to give the *full*
list, but that's a good chunk of it. And nothing extra added for
fragrance.)
, they are
*not* 99% as claimed on the first missed menses
cycle day (2-4 weeks).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrievedb=PubMedlist_uids=11719477dopt=Abstract
It is also abundantly clear that second-hand smoke is
detrimental to fetuses, infants, children and adults
with respiratory
Deborah Harrell wrote:
Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Snip bad science for commercial purposes]
I clearly stated that these kits will have to be
tested against medical laboratory standards to be
considered reasonable. Frex while home pregnancy kits
are reasonably
Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
snip
Frex while home pregnancy kits
are reasonably accurate after ~6-8 weeks, they are
*not* 99% as claimed on the first missed menses
cycle day (2-4 weeks).
Huh. I never had a problem with a false negative.
I'm
Deborah Harrell wrote:
Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
snip
Frex while home pregnancy kits
are reasonably accurate after ~6-8 weeks, they are
*not* 99% as claimed on the first missed menses
cycle day (2-4 weeks).
Huh. I never had a problem
Julia wrote:
Uh, yeah. How hard can it be to pee on the correct part of the thing,
anyway? :)
Depends on how far awy you stand. 8^)
--
Doug
ROU Target Practice
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
In a message dated 1/20/2004 11:20:29 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Julia wrote:
Uh, yeah. How hard can it be to pee on the correct part of the thing,
anyway? :)
Depends on how far awy you stand. 8^)
The introduction of the strategically
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/science/20021029-_1m29smoke.html
Scripps scientists link chemical in tobacco with onset of diseases
By Bruce Lieberman UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER October 29, 2002 A
naturally present chemical in tobacco may contribute to the onset of
24 matches
Mail list logo
