Original Message:
-
From: Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 15:17:39 +1000
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: An interesting response
On 03/05/2008, at 1:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and their fuel loads per passenger. One would have to stop for
On 04/05/2008, at 12:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second article shows a _demostrated_ range of 13500 for the
777 , and
the nonstop route would be somewhat shorter than a one stop route.
When loaded with passengers and baggage, the airline will be able to
fly 10,900 miles non-stop
William T Goodall wrote:
So we don't really know how available some minerals are until we start
looking for them harder?
It happened with oil and gas. Brazil was considered with no oil back in
the 1930s - they were almost right, considering the technology of the time.
Probably the UK and
Julia Thompson wrote:
The moon. The frakkin' moon.
By what they said in dialogue at one point, I figured it was waning. Then
when we saw it on the screen, it was waxing.
Do they need to hire someone who understands the phases of the moon there?
The idiocy of script writers spoiled the
http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/29/autos/gas_engine_improvements/index.htm
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
