On Mon, 10/19/09, John Williams jwilliams4...@gmail.com wrote:
Never underestimate the power of human error. As this
debacle demonstrates.
(me, IIRC) Which particular debacle would that be?
I was referring to the Sidekick debacle:
Julia wrote:
(Jo Anne -- a RAID is a Redundant Array of Independent Disks, where the data
is stored on multiple disks and checked for accuracy on some regular basis.
If one drive goes down, either the data should be duplicated somewhere, or
there should be enough information stored on another
From: John Williams jwilliams4...@gmail.com
massive snip
Never underestimate the power of human error. As this
debacle demonstrates.
Which particular debacle would that be? We gotcher health care, Afghanistan,
Eyerak, and balloon boys...
Take yer pik!
Debbi
Whaddya Expect From A Family
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Deborah Harrell
harrellmed...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: John Williams jwilliams4...@gmail.com
massive snip
Never underestimate the power of human error. As this
debacle demonstrates.
Which particular debacle would that be?
I was referring to the Sidekick
On Oct 18, 2009, at 12:25 AM, Max Battcher wrote:
On 10/18/2009 0:38, John Williams wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Julia Thompsonf...@zurg.net
wrote:
Er. In that sort of a situation, I myself would set up a RAID for
storing
the data, *much* less chance for losing it.
RAID
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Bruce Bostwick
lihan161...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On Oct 18, 2009, at 12:25 AM, Max Battcher wrote:
On 10/18/2009 0:38, John Williams wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Julia Thompsonf...@zurg.net wrote:
Er. In that sort of a situation, I myself would
Er. In that sort of a situation, I myself would set up a RAID for storing
the data, *much* less chance for losing it. I'd just do that anyway. In
fact, the computer that's still in a box and is destined to replace the one
I'm using right now has a RAID, because I seem to have a knack for
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Julia Thompson f...@zurg.net wrote:
Er. In that sort of a situation, I myself would set up a RAID for storing
the data, *much* less chance for losing it.
RAID does not protect from rm -rf / , which (some variant of) is my
guess at what happened. Although now
On 10/18/2009 0:38, John Williams wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Julia Thompsonf...@zurg.net wrote:
Er. In that sort of a situation, I myself would set up a RAID for storing
the data, *much* less chance for losing it.
RAID does not protect from rm -rf / , which (some variant of) is
