Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-26 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 04:27 PM Monday 8/25/2008, John Williams wrote:

I was writing about economics, not morality. But since you asked. I 
do not think it is fair for someone to take my money and give it to 
agricultural corporations.



Who do you think it is fair for someone to take your money and give it to?


. . . ronn!  :)



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-26 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 05:16 PM Monday 8/25/2008, Olin Elliott wrote:
(I'm 45, born the same week Kennedy was shot)

ObSF:

And the week _Doctor Who_ premiered . . .


. . . ronn!  :)



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-26 Thread Olin Elliott
(I'm 45, born the same week Kennedy was shot)

ObSF:

And the week _Doctor Who_ premiered 

Thanks, Ronn.  I never knew that.  That's an anniversary worth celebrating.

Olin
  - Original Message - 
  From: Ronn! Blankenshipmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussionmailto:brin-l@mccmedia.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:13 AM
  Subject: Re: McCain Positions


  At 05:16 PM Monday 8/25/2008, Olin Elliott wrote:
  (I'm 45, born the same week Kennedy was shot)

  ObSF:

  And the week _Doctor Who_ premiered . . .


  . . . ronn!  :)



  ___
  
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-lhttp://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-26 Thread John Williams


 From: Ronn! Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Who do you think it is fair for someone to take your money and give it to?

An efficient justice system, including courts and police. Road and bridge 
builders are okay. Military engaged in defending (in a narrow definition of 
defend) the country. Individuals with very low or no income. Surely not a 
corporation.


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-26 Thread Julia Thompson


On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:

 At 05:16 PM Monday 8/25/2008, Olin Elliott wrote:
 (I'm 45, born the same week Kennedy was shot)

 ObSF:

 And the week _Doctor Who_ premiered . . .

And the week C. S. Lewis died.  Heck, he died on the *day* Kennedy was 
shot.

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-26 Thread John Garcia
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:



 On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:

  At 05:16 PM Monday 8/25/2008, Olin Elliott wrote:
  (I'm 45, born the same week Kennedy was shot)
 
  ObSF:
 
  And the week _Doctor Who_ premiered . . .

 And the week C. S. Lewis died.  Heck, he died on the *day* Kennedy was
 shot.

Julia

 ___
 http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Aldous Huxley
and don't forget JD Tippit

john (who 45 years later still remembers where he was when he heard the
news)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread Olin Elliott
On the face of it, none of this sounds horrendous. As with any promise, the
real deal is whether or not he can or will deliver. YMMV. It's all just a
matter of trust.

  
Exactly.  And even if I did trust John McCain personally (which I don't), I 
wouldn't trust the Republican machinery that comes with him.  Where does it say 
in there that he's gong to take the EPA and other regulatory agencies out of 
the hands of the people they're supposed to be regulating?  And where does it 
say he's going to disavow the medieval world view of the Fundamentalist leaders 
he's been cozying up to?




  - Original Message - 
  From: John Garciamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussionmailto:brin-l@mccmedia.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:34 AM
  Subject: McCain Positions


  While I wait for a vendor to call me, I thought I'd post some McCain
  campaign
  stuff about science and the internet, taken from his website. What do you
  all think?

  *John McCain Would Place A Priority On Science And Technology
  Experience.*As President, John McCain will be committed to bringing
  talented men and
  women of science into the federal government. He will strive to ensure that
  Administration appointees across the government have adequate experience and
  understanding of science, technology and innovation in order to better serve
  the American people.

  *John McCain Will Preserve Consumer Freedoms. *John McCain will focus on
  policies that leave consumers free to access the content they choose; free
  to use the applications and services they choose; free to attach devices
  they choose, if they do not harm the network; and free to chose among
  broadband service providers.

  *John McCain Would Ensure That The Federal Government Led By
  Example.*Government can advance Americans' access to high speed
  Internet services by
  using it to better serve the people. Government services should be available
  online and government can better serve the American people by operating more
  efficiently through the use of technology, including videoconferencing and
  collaborative networks. For over a decade, John McCain has supported placing
  more government information online for the benefit of all of the American
  people. Since 2001, he has called for an Office of Electronic Government to
  set a strategic vision for implementation of electronic government

  *John McCain Would Support The Federal Government As An Innovator.* John
  McCain as president would push for a renewed emphasis on innovation through
  Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) where industry and
  government enter into public/private projects, sharing in the cost,
  benefiting from solving real problems, accelerating the application of
  technology in the government. This way the government is a leader of the
  technology revolution and not simply a beneficiary.

  On the face of it, none of this sounds horrendous. As with any promise, the
  real deal is whether or not he can or will deliver. YMMV. It's all just a
  matter of trust.

  john
  ___
  
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-lhttp://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread John Garcia
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Olin Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On the face of it, none of this sounds horrendous. As with any promise,
 the
 real deal is whether or not he can or will deliver. YMMV. It's all just a
 matter of trust.


 Exactly.  And even if I did trust John McCain personally (which I don't), I
 wouldn't trust the Republican machinery that comes with him.  Where does it
 say in there that he's gong to take the EPA and other regulatory agencies
 out of the hands of the people they're supposed to be regulating?  And where
 does it say he's going to disavow the medieval world view of the
 Fundamentalist leaders he's been cozying up to?




 snipped


My point is that candidates can (and have) promised anything and everything,
usually coached in careful language. We trust the candidate that we favor to
fulfill those promises. When they do not, they have damaged our trust in
them.

Personally, I would prefer to see the 2000 McCain running, but he isn't.
That guy went down in flames eight years ago.
Also, I don't believe that the Republicans have a vision for the USA that is
consistent with my values. The Democrats do have a vision that is more
consistent with my values, but not 100%.

john
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread John Williams

Olin wrote:

 And even if I did trust John McCain personally (which I don't), I 
 wouldn't trust the Republican machinery that comes with him.

I don't trust McCain, I don't trust Republican machinery, I don't trust Obama, 
and I don't trust Democrat's machinery.
I do not trust politicians. Do you?

I am generally in favor of politicians who demonstrate a record of less 
government spending and smaller government. Unfortunately, libertarians do not 
seem able to win many elections. I guess it has something to do with being 
difficult to win an election without pandering to special interests.

I have not decided whether I will vote for McCain or Obama (I will not vote 3rd 
party since I do not want to waste my vote). One thing that I have not seen 
mentioned yet about the candidates is that McCain has a dramatically better 
voting record on free trade (one of few points of near universal agreement 
among economists is that subsidies and trade barriers are harmful):

http://www.freetrade.org/congress?senator=84
http://www.freetrade.org/congress?senator=75


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread Doug Pensinger
John wrote:


 I am generally in favor of politicians who demonstrate a record of less
 government spending and smaller government.

You mean like Clinton?

Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread John Williams


 From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 You mean like Clinton?

I was not old enough to vote for Clinton, but retroactively, yes, I would vote 
for him :-)

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/downchart_gs.php?year=1970_2010view=1expand=units=pfy=fy09chart=F0-fedstack=1title=

Are you suggesting Obama would do the same? I do not see any evidence of that. 
My guess is that Obama will budget less on defense than McCain, but Obama would 
budget more on entitlements. I don't think either candidate will reduce 
government spending, which is why I am having difficulty deciding.


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread John Williams


 From: Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 are you suggesting that free trade is fair trade?

I was writing about economics, not morality. But since you asked. I do not 
think it is fair for someone to take my money and give it to agricultural 
corporations. I do not think it is fair for someone to bar me from trading with 
a mutual consenting partner.


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread Olin Elliott
Actually, I didn't write that.  I'm not sure who did.  Free/fair trade, though 
important, I grant, is not usually an issue I get worked up about.  Not sure 
who wrote the paragraph you qutoed,

Olin
  - Original Message - 
  From: Jon Louis Mannmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussionmailto:brin-l@mccmedia.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 1:50 PM
  Subject: McCain Positions


   Olin wrote:
   One thing that I have not seen mentioned yet about
   the candidates is that McCain has a dramatically better
   voting record on free trade (one of few points of near
   universal agreement among economists is that subsidies and
   trade barriers are harmful):

  are you suggesting that free trade is fair trade?
  jon



  ___
  
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-lhttp://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread Olin Elliott
I don't trust McCain, I don't trust Republican machinery, I don't trust Obama, 
and I don't trust Democrat's machinery.
I do not trust politicians. Do you?

  
Yes, I do trust some politicians -- and more to the point I trust some more 
than others. The cynical position that all politicians are bad or untrustworthy 
is no more reasonable than any other blanket indictment of a group.   I think 
the record of administrations in my lifetime (I'm 45, born the same week 
Kennedy was shot) is pretty clear -- Democrats have proven themselves more 
responsible and trustworthy than Republicans by orders of magnitude.  Not only 
on Democratic issues like civil rights and the environment (my number one 
issue) but also on what are supposed to be conservative issues like fiscal 
responsibility.  Clinton was by far the most fiscally responsible president of 
my lifetime.  And yes, I trusted Bill Clinton on the big issues -- not on 
everything certainly, not on his personal life for instance, and I recognize 
the faults of both Clintons, through I have enormous respect for both of them 
-- but I think its telling that Clinton got impeached in large part be
 cause he had enough respect for the rule of law to testify under oath for a 
deposition.  He lied, true, but he lied about a question that never should have 
been within the scope of the investigation in the first place.  The Bush gang 
won't go anywhere near an oath -- they avoid them like vampires avoid garlic.  



I trust the Democratic party several orders of magnitude more than I trust the 
Republicans, and I don't think that's just ideology -- I think it's the only 
valid empirical conclusion from the experience of the last forty years.



Olin



  - Original Message - 
  From: John Williamsmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussionmailto:brin-l@mccmedia.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 12:25 PM
  Subject: Re: McCain Positions



  Olin wrote:

   And even if I did trust John McCain personally (which I don't), I 
   wouldn't trust the Republican machinery that comes with him.

  I don't trust McCain, I don't trust Republican machinery, I don't trust 
Obama, and I don't trust Democrat's machinery.
  I do not trust politicians. Do you?

  I am generally in favor of politicians who demonstrate a record of less 
government spending and smaller government. Unfortunately, libertarians do not 
seem able to win many elections. I guess it has something to do with being 
difficult to win an election without pandering to special interests.

  I have not decided whether I will vote for McCain or Obama (I will not vote 
3rd party since I do not want to waste my vote). One thing that I have not seen 
mentioned yet about the candidates is that McCain has a dramatically better 
voting record on free trade (one of few points of near universal agreement 
among economists is that subsidies and trade barriers are harmful):

  
http://www.freetrade.org/congress?senator=84http://www.freetrade.org/congress?senator=84
  
http://www.freetrade.org/congress?senator=75http://www.freetrade.org/congress?senator=75




  ___
  
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-lhttp://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: McCain Positions

2008-08-25 Thread Max Battcher
John Garcia wrote:
 While I wait for a vendor to call me, I thought I'd post some McCain
 campaign
 stuff about science and the internet, taken from his website. What do you
 all think?
 
 *John McCain Would Place A Priority On Science And Technology
 Experience.*As President, John McCain will be committed to bringing
 talented men and
 women of science into the federal government. He will strive to ensure that
 Administration appointees across the government have adequate experience and
 understanding of science, technology and innovation in order to better serve
 the American people.

This is one of the of the areas important to me, as a technology 
worker.  There are, unfortunately, serious worries in McCain's stated 
technology policy (which was one of the last of his policies to be 
finalized and publicly posted, and yet should probably have been one of 
the first) and voting record.  I shall refer you to the presentation of 
Dr. Lessig on the subject:

http://lessig.org/blog/2008/08/me_on_mccain_on_technology.html

(Dr. Lessig is someone that I have come to trust on the legal/political 
side of technology and intellectual property who knows what's at stake 
on the issues and is very eloquent when discussing them...)

--
--Max Battcher--
http://www.worldmaker.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l